Poll: What's your favorite commemorative design?

It took awhile...but they're all here. Even the Isabella and the gold. 
Edited to add: Personally, I love the California. It's quite a bit pricey, but nice examples with color are IMO grossly underrated. The miner is an excellent example of a true American image.

Edited to add: Personally, I love the California. It's quite a bit pricey, but nice examples with color are IMO grossly underrated. The miner is an excellent example of a true American image.
0
Comments
My favorite is LeeG's Oregon Commem- Most beautifully toned coin I have ever seen.
From CoinFacts....................
on the Calif. Comm. Plus 1925 was the year my father was born.
<< <i>Tough to answer.......I went with the Oregon Trail.........thanks to LeeG's pretty coin.
From CoinFacts....................
Yes, the Oregon Trail for me too...
POST NUBILA PHOEBUS / AFTER CLOUDS, SUN
Love for Music / Collector of Dreck
Best reverse -- Vermont's catamount.
- Jim
I think it's the most beatiful US coin, period. And one of the top dozen or so, worldwide.
I'm a sucker for coins with ships on them.
beauty of Lincolns worn and caring face, to the magnificent
eagle on the reverse .This is a Commemorative that is haunting
in it's artistry and stands above all other commemoratives in
the series.
Camelot
I love the Oregon Trial!
Compare with the awful Washington-Carver half or any of the state quarters.
JH
Proof Buffalo Registry Set
Capped Bust Quarters Registry Set
Proof Walking Liberty Halves Registry Set
I have expensive taste.
>>>My Collection
<< <i>I would never call the 1848 "Cal" a Commem. At least not part of the Commem set that people are familar with. It's a great coin, but not a Commem in my opinion. >>
Many people are only aware of commems that are issued as NCLT to collectors and the bi-centennial circulation pieces. Getting out the news of the 1848 CAL quarter eagle commem is good numismatic evangelism
One major difference is that the vast majority of classic and modern commens were/are NCLT. The CAL quarter eagles were made for circulation to highlight a specific event, the discovery of gold in California. Many people see this as "commemorating" the discovery of gold. The vast majority of classic and modern commems were/are also issued to for some kind of anniversary. The 1848 CAL was issued to commemorate a contemporary event.
So it may be true that the CAL quarter eagle is not the type of commem some people are familiar with because:
(1) it was designed to circulate, not as NCLT
(2) it was designed to commemorate a contemporary event, not an anniversary of one.
I'm sure there are other differences. Regarding whether it qualifies as a commem:
(a) if the definition of a commemorative is to commemorate an event, then the CAL quarter eagle qualifies
(b) if the definition of a commemorative is NCLT, then it does not
(c) if the definition of a commemorative requires a multi-year anniversary, then it may not
Many people seem to think a commemorative should be to commemorate an event, one in the past or a contemporary one.
SCDs also cover events that are both in the past or contemporary to issuance.
Many people are only aware of commems that are issued as NCLT to collectors and the bi-centennial circulation pieces. Getting out the news of the 1848 CAL quarter eagle commem is good numismatic evangelism
One major difference is that the vast majority of classic and modern commens were/are NCLT. The CAL quarter eagles were made for circulation to highlight a specific event, the discovery of gold in California. Many people see this as "commemorating" the discovery of gold. The vast majority of classic and modern commems were/are also issued to for some kind of anniversary. The 1848 CAL was issued to commemorate a contemporary event.
So it may be true that the CAL quarter eagle is not the type of commem some people are familiar with because:
(1) it was designed to circulate, not as NCLT
(2) it was designed to commemorate a contemporary event, not an anniversary of one.
I'm sure there are other differences.
If the definition of a commemorative is to commemorate an event, then the CAL quarter eagle qualifies.
If the definition of a commemorative is NCLT or an anniversary, then it may not.
Many people seem to think a commemorative should be to commemorate an event, one in the past or a contemporary one.
SCDs also cover events that are both in the past or contemporary to issuance. >>
Well said, but I think of it in simpler terms. The 1848 Cal doesn't LOOK like a Commem. Commems are entirely new designs to commemorate an event. The 1848 Cal is a regular quarter eagle with three tiny letters on it. IMHO, calling the Cal a commem is like calling a "with arrows" quarter a commem. It's the same basic principle.
<< <i>I think of it in simpler terms. The 1848 Cal doesn't LOOK like a Commem. Commems are entirely new designs to commemorate an event. The 1848 Cal is a regular quarter eagle with three tiny letters on it. IMHO, calling the Cal a commem is like calling a "with arrows" quarter a commem. It's the same basic principle. >>
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but you're missing a key element of the CAL quarter eagle. In addition to having three extra letters, it was made from California gold, somewhat significant since the purpose was to spread the word of the discovery of gold in California. For some people, this is more important and historical than a new design.
Other factors at work include that it was a contemporary issue so there would not have been much time to create a new design and it appeared far earlier than NCLT issues so the Mint didn't have a process for creating and issuing completely new designs for commems.
Camelot
Dizzy, that's amazing!
must be totally wrong.
Camelot
Anyone else, I find this poll pretty interesting.
K
My 1866 Philly Mint Set