Home U.S. Coin Forum

Would you pay a Premium for PCGS coins over NGC?


Would you pay a Premium for PCGS coins over NGC?

Assume you were buying Seated coins. The coins looked to be exactly the same, say a 1853 arrows MS65.
The coins were twins of each other.

Would you pay a premium for the PCGS holder?

If so how much?
I seldom check PM's but do check emails often jason@seated.org

Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.

Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.
«1

Comments

  • Aegis3Aegis3 Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭
    Buy the coin, not the holder. If I like two same coins the same amount, I'll buy the less expensive one. It's gonna get cracked out anyway knowing me. Keep the coin not the holder. :)
    --

    Ed. S.

    (EJS)
  • I don't know about seated coins, but I prefer the PCGS holder over NGC's.
    image
    To support LordM's European Trip, click here!
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Identical Liberty Seated coin in a PCGS holder, yes, I would pay more for that coin because I could sell that coin for more. I'm speaking of MS/PF63 or better grades here. I'd be less tempted to pay a premium in lower grades. Typically, the same or slightly inferior PCGS coin is perceived as better, even if 100% identical to it's NGC competitor. They typically bring a 5-15% premium depending on the type of coin and grade. That's my experience.

    roadrunner
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,011 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've done it for years.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,209 ✭✭✭✭✭
    My first instinct was 'yes' ... and then I thought about it more and decided I'd probably pay more for the NGC coin. Why? Since PCGS optical plastic is so much better, if the two coins look the same then the NGC coin is probably slightly finer. image
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'll pay whatever it takes to get my coin in a pcgs holder, and I think everybody should do the same. Only pcgs for me!!image
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977


    << <i>I'll pay whatever it takes to get my coin in a pcgs holder, and I think everybody should do the same. Only pcgs for me!!image >>

    image
  • This content has been removed.
  • RarityRarity Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭✭
    I will pay a premium of 5% or less because I simply like the see-through PCGS holder better.
  • All things being equal, I'd buy the PCGS coin. Of course, normally all things aren't equal, so in that case, I'd buy the one that I thought had a better technical look. If I want the PCGS holder, I could always send it in.
    If you haven't noticed, I'm single and miserable and I've got four albums of bitching about it that I would offer as proof.

    -- Adam Duritz, of Counting Crows


    My Ebay Auctions
    image
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,419 ✭✭✭✭✭
    As a dealer, I'll usually pay a premium for PCGS because I can recapture it on the sale.

    As a collector, I won't pay a premium because I value all plastic at zero. (Except certain experimental pieces dated 1942!)
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Browser problem. Deleted.
    If you haven't noticed, I'm single and miserable and I've got four albums of bitching about it that I would offer as proof.

    -- Adam Duritz, of Counting Crows


    My Ebay Auctions
    image
  • Coin not the Holder !
  • thebeavthebeav Posts: 3,923 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Let's think about this for a minute...

    I pay more for PCGS, but can sell it for more....

    vs.


    I pay less for NGC, but they sell for less....



    imageimage


    I...I.....I can't decide what to do..............can someone help me...............please........image
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • AnkurJAnkurJ Posts: 11,370 ✭✭✭✭
    I would not pay a premium for any holder, whether it is PCGS or any other company.

    Ankur
    All coins kept in bank vaults.
    PCGS Registries
    Box of 20
    SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
  • Nope. If there's a glaring difference in price on coins the same grade and quality, I'd buy the NGC, crack it out, send it to PCGS and sell it for more down the road. Of course, this is strictly speaking if the coins are the same quality.
  • If it were the same exact coin, one would generally pay a premium for the PCGS holder because it is easier to resell. If it were not the same coin, but rather the same issue in the same grade, then of course one would have to look at the two coins and price them according to their relative quality. However, since most anything that could cross has been crossed, it is often the case that the PCGS coin in the same grade is a technically superior specimen. I have seen it over and over in the series that I have collected ... especially in the higher grades ... 19th century type coins in NGC 67 and 68 holders that would never ever get those grades at PCGS. So of course, if the coin in the PCGS holder happens also to be technically superior, then it will be worth more.

    Bottom line, no matter how you want to analyze it, the PCGS coin is gonig to carry the premium most of the time ...

    Best,
    Sunnywood
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,842 ✭✭✭✭✭
    NO.

    Encouraging the PGCS monopoly in the coin grading industry is not a healthy situation for collectors. Monopolies encourage sellers to raise prices and offer poorer service. If NGC is relegated to “third world” grading service status, PCGS will have no competition. That would make the PCGS stockholders and insider dealers happy, but everyone else would get screwed.

    We have already seen that it is impossible for a new firm to join the “top two” market no matter how hard it tries. If they grade their coins properly or conservatively, their good coins get cracked out and crossed over. If they grade optimistically they join ranks of the third world.

    Monopolies on no good, and you PCGS weenie, Kool aid drinkers, should devote a few seconds of thought to that before you act like Pavlov dogs.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • NO WAY!
  • NicNic Posts: 3,415 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Agree with RR, TDN, Mr. E , and Sunny. K
  • not drinking Kool-Aid, I haven't had that stuff since I was a kid LOL ... not saying monopoly is good either, just answering the question that was asked in a logical way that reflects market realities ... .

    Frankly, it would be better if there were ONE consistent grading standard, and you can only get that by having ONE grading organization ... several companies all trying to adhere to the same grading guidelines will end up with different results ... hell, even any ONE company ends up with different results half the time LOL ... the best thing would have been if the ANA's original grading service had caught fire like PCGS ... ideally, one not-for-profit monopoly grading company wouldn't be so bad, just as benevolent dictatorship is arguably an excellent form of government. But how would it stay objective, innovative, etc. ... always a problem. Hence, the benefits of competition ... so perhaps the most valuable role played by NGC is that of the only viable competitor, to spur innovation, quality, consistency and customer service ...

    Best,
    Sunnywood
  • mozeppamozeppa Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭
    I buy the plastic...not the coin.



    - C. Kiefer
  • I will not buy NGC Holders. even though some maybe equil to PCGS, most are not!! especially ( TOP POP COINS )
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I buy the plastic...not the coin.



    - C. Kiefer >>



    In fact... if someone offered me an NGC coin that was the same exact coin as a PCGS coin for half the price.... I would throw the NGC coin in the river...............

    who wouldn't.....??????
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,842 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I will not buy NGC Holders. even though some maybe equil to PCGS, most are not!! especially ( TOP POP COINS ) >>



    The bell is ringing ... now salivate.

    Good dog! Good dog! image
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I will not buy NGC Holders. even though some maybe equil to PCGS, most are not!! especially ( TOP POP COINS ) >>



    The bell is ringing ... now salivate.

    Good dog! Good dog! image >>



    You know Bill... Pavlov could prove his theories on the CU boards.................image
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • MyqqyMyqqy Posts: 9,777
    Monopolies on no good, and you PCGS weenie, Kool aid drinkers, should devote a few seconds of thought to that before you act like Pavlov dogs.

    That's awesome!!! image

    Personally, I'm not inclined to pay more if it's the same quality as the ngc coin. But I'm strictly a collector who wants to hold on to what I buy....
    My style is impetuous, my defense is impregnable !
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,856 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Depends on what is in the plastic...

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,621 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Simple for me when it comes to five dollar gold half eagle indians....

    PCGS is worth more just for being properly graded.
    The scenario given is impossible when we are talking about those particular coins, from my experience. At least not in grades AU50 to MS62.
    I'll pay to have them in PCGS plastic over NGC's. PCGS grades are closer to what my eye sees, too.... Plus, I think they have a standard for both obverse, reverse, rim/edge, luster, strike, and overall eye appeal, while the Gold Half Eagles I've had and seen in NGC holders almost always lack shoulder feather detail on the reverse, where this detail is obvious in PCGS holders.
    It ain't the plastic, it's the standard. image
  • AZLARRYAZLARRY Posts: 1,189 ✭✭
    No, I have many NGC coins that are graded correctly. Most of them cost me less than the same coin in a PCGS holder. I look at each coin and grade the coin not the plastic that holds the coin, that seems silly. I have in my collection about a 50/50 split between PCGS and NGC coins.
    image
  • FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,426 ✭✭✭✭✭
    PCGS and NGC have coins ? Hmmm.....

    Ken
  • 53BKid53BKid Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭
    I don't even look at NGCs--they're far too liberal with their grades IMHO
    HAPPY COLLECTING!!!
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I don't even look at NGCs--they're far too liberal with their grades IMHO >>



    no problem---there are less and less NGC slabs around anyway. That is because everyone has finally realized that only PCGS slabs are good and one by one all the NGC slabs are being thrown in the river.

    image
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • MilesWaitsMilesWaits Posts: 5,434 ✭✭✭✭✭
    For the Ultra Moderns, like the AGE Graded Sets, it seems PCGS is receiving higher prices.
    I appreciate the new Full View ANACS slabs as long as I can get the coin at a price that allows for the difference in resell.
    NGC, it seems, has beome a mass marketed "holder" for moderns. PCGS appears stricter in their 70's so I would prefer to own their 70's, price allowing.
    $15,000 plus or a 70's set of AGE's! NGC much lower. Seems more people are interested in paying higher prices for PCGS slabbed coins in the "impulsive" lots?
    Miles
      Now riding the swell in PM's and surf.
    • garsmithgarsmith Posts: 5,894 ✭✭
      I prefer PCGS graded coins, but if the coins are identical in quality I would go for the NGC (lower price) and than cross it over!
    • TrimeTrime Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭
      Of course it depends on the coin but also
      depends on the series.
      As an example for 3CS pieces. PCGS grades more conservatively.
      Thus more value for grade in PCGS coins as similar quality NGC 1 grade up sells at a premium.
      For other series this does not apply.
      Trime
    • seateddimeseateddime Posts: 6,180 ✭✭✭
      I have lost what little respect I had for NGC.

      I spent the last 3 hours going over about 150 slabbed seated dimes, I found that for the most part the PCGS coins in the XF-AU range were 1/2 a graded less in a PCGS holder than a NGC.

      I looked at a 1850 PCGS graded XF45 that I really think is AU and was sold to me by well known seated dime expert as AU. This coin was far nicer than the AU55 NGC coin in my registry set.

      It really was not even close.

      There were a few coins that were clearly cleaned, not bad, but cleaned in NGC holders.

      I think that PCGS grading is a premium to NGC and should be worth more money
      I seldom check PM's but do check emails often jason@seated.org

      Buying top quality Seated Dimes in Gem BU and Proof.

      Buying great coins - monster eye appeal only.
    • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
      Yes, but only a few dollars and only if the coins were identical. I buy the coin, but I prefer the look of the PCGS holder better.

      If I saw a better coin in an NGC holder, I'd pay more for it if any day.

      Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
    • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
      Because I buy as a collector and not as a reseller, NO. I buy the coin. Like it or not I can understand why dealers and coin flippers buy the holder. But as a collector first and foremost, I don't. Hell, since I buy mostly circulated stuff I'd love to buy ICG stuff, since I think they're as good as anyone for circulated classics, but they get little respect.

      As for those who think it has to be PCGS or nothing...

      image
    • RYKRYK Posts: 35,800 ✭✭✭✭✭


      << <i>Yes, but only a few dollars and only if the coins were identical. I buy the coin, but I prefer the look of the PCGS holder better.

      If I saw a better coin in an NGC holder, I'd pay more for it if any day. >>



      I agree with you. I will pay up for a nice coin, regardless of the plastic. I do prefer the aesthetics of the PCGS holder, though.


      image
    • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,881 ✭✭✭✭✭
      NO!!! I collect coins---NOT plastic. I've got nice coins in all three top tier slabs.

      Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
      "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
      "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

    • MadMartyMadMarty Posts: 16,697 ✭✭✭
      I love you koolaid drinkers!!!
      It is not exactly cheating, I prefer to consider it creative problem solving!!!

    • Yes absolutely. There's a premium for PCGS plactic and it's just a lot easier to liquidate these.

      I've also cocnstantly noticed lower quality material in NGC holders when it comes to Morgans, which

      I look at during lot viewing. Most NGC "stuff" of that really just "failed" PCGS submissions and left overs I realize--but

      the fact remains the NGC coin has to be clearly superior and I look at it extra carefully for thumbing etc.

      I do own a fair percentage of NGC coins, but there are groups I just won't buy--Morgan Deep Proof Likes for example.
      morgannut2
    • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭


      << <i>As a dealer, I'll usually pay a premium for PCGS because I can recapture it on the sale.

      As a collector, I won't pay a premium because I value all plastic at zero. (Except certain experimental pieces dated 1942!) >>



      First thought that came to my mind. Second thought was even as a collecter I might pay a premium which would be the grading fee, insurance and postage.

      Third thought was no, not as a collector.
    • FullStepJeffsFullStepJeffs Posts: 1,874 ✭✭✭
      Here's my five cents...

      When I made the price guide for Jeffersons, I was shocked at the difference between final selling prices for the same coin in different holders.

      Example: 1950 PF67CAM Jefferson in NGC holder... $270

      Same Coin/grade in PCGS holder... $650 at that time. Just one example, and if I had the price guide with me, I could give you hundreds of other examples.

      So, yes people continually pay premiums for the same grades. The number you ask for in your post is subject to how much you really want the coin.

      Steve
      U.S. Air Force Security Forces Retired

      In memory of the USAF Security Forces lost: A1C Elizabeth N. Jacobson, 9/28/05; SSgt Brian McElroy, 1/22/06; TSgt Jason Norton, 1/22/06; A1C Lee Chavis, 10/14/06; SSgt John Self, 5/14/07; A1C Jason Nathan, 6/23/07; SSgt Travis Griffin, 4/3/08; 1Lt Joseph Helton, 9/8/09; SrA Nicholas J. Alden, 3/3/2011. God Bless them and all those who have lost loved ones in this war. I will never forget their loss.
    • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977
      I too buy the coin and not the holder. And I've been called plenty of things, but a PCGS Kool-Aid drinker is not one of them. However, currently the market has placed a premium on PCGS slabs. Therefore, it is unlikely that you will find equal graded coins in PCGS and NGC slabs selling at the same price. Understanding the current market dynamics I choose the best coin regardless of slab, but understand that when the PCGS slab is selected I am most likely paying the premium dictated by the market.
    • I would pay a little more. I wouldn't consider it a premium.
    • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
      PCGS grades tighter on 19th century type for example. It only makes sense that with less of their coins in MS65 holders, thay they should bring more. The orig question is misleading because usually the "same" PCGS and NGC coin are not the same.

      My best example: MS65 bust halves. PCGS has graded half as many as NGC. They've both graded a similar number of bust halves. MS 65 pops are something like 250 vs. 500. It didn't get like this because NGC grades the same. PCGS has tighter standards for rub, luster, and marks. Just the way it is. Consequently you'll pay $7500 for a PCGS bustie in MS65 vs the $5000 that an NGC piece would command. And frankly, if you have one of the bottom 50% of all the NGC pieces graded, you're paying $5K for a PCGS MS64. If one wants to wait to snap up an NGC MS65 for $5000 that will meet the PCGS MS65 standards you'll have your work cut out for you. If the 10-20 dealers in front of you don't see it first, just maybe you'll get it.

      However, since most anything that could cross has been crossed, it is often the case that the PCGS coin in the same grade is a technically superior specimen .

      I think there are a lot of NGC crossable coins out there yet to be crossed. 75% of what I have are NGC type coins. I have no doubt
      that the vast majority would cross or bring PCGS money...or more.
      Why bother if PCGS won't cross them without paying them thousands of bucks in fees? And I agree with you that for MS66-67 type PCGS hates (and usually won't) cross those. Comically, the one and only NGC68 coin I owned (and I felt it was only an NGC 67+ or a PCGS 66+) got crossed right after I sold it. And besides crossing it PCGS tossed in CAM as well. More than doubled the price as a PF68CAM seated half. Went from NGC pop 30 for type to PCGS pop 2 for type! And the coin was wiped on the reverse as well. Go figure.

      roadrunner
      Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
    • I buy PCGS coins for the guaranty of authenticity [sic].

    Leave a Comment

    BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
    Emoji
    Image
    Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
    Drop image/file