Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1907 Indian Head Cent - Guess the grade.

RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
image
image

It's in an NGC holder.

Russ, NCNE

Comments

  • Options
    JJMJJM Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    58??? , I always get whacked when I go first image
    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly, justindan
  • Options
    I'll say NGC called it a 62BN.
  • Options
    BunkerBunker Posts: 3,926 ✭
    I think 58 also
    image

    My daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 2 (2003). My son was diagnosed with Type 1 when he was 17 on December 31, 2009. We were stunned that another child of ours had been diagnosed. Please, if you don't have a favorite charity, consider giving to the JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation)

    JDRF Donation
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Those who think it's AU58, why?

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    coinnut86coinnut86 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I'll say NGC called it a 62BN. >>



    image
    image
  • Options
    seanqseanq Posts: 8,866 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I also figured AU58 becuase of what looks like rub on the top two feathers, the hair below the ribbon, and the left side of the wreath on the reverse. If those are the result of a weak strike, and the coin has full luster in hand, I'd call it 63BN.


    Sean Reynolds
    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • Options
    JJMJJM Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    the obv is pretty tight, but the shield lines on the rev are touched, and the "one cent" lettering as well as the ribbon on the wreath shows a lil wear, no?....but I really dont know squat,....the coin looked tricky to grade as soon as I saw it....I'll be glad to embrace the coin into my collection, however....


    image
    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly, justindan
  • Options
    NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 11,050 ✭✭✭✭✭
    62 BN
  • Options
    LanLordLanLord Posts: 11,763 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Those who think it's AU58, why? Russ, NCNE >>

    The cheek looks discolored. I would call it 5(something) also.

    There is a soft strike, and I believe some wear.

    Just my poor arse opinion.
  • Options
    mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    62bn
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • Options
    BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,972 ✭✭✭
    Details seem kinda weak, not sure if it is due to wear or a weak strike. I am not very good at grading copper yet. If its wear then definately a 58 if it is weak strike it can't be more than 63.
  • Options
    62bn maybe 63
    USPI minimalist design collage
    image
    designset
    Treasury Seals Type Set
  • Options
    shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    Cleaned AU details on the obverse, XF details on the reverse. This coin has dipped shadows on the obverse profile and an obviously worn denomination on the reverse. The color is funky, the fields have waves in many areas, and this is the first IH you've posted I really don't like image
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭
    AU 50 BN
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    62BN


    imageimage
  • Options
    IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    Ok I will walk the plank on this coin 64 browny
  • Options
    mozeppamozeppa Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭
    64 brown
  • Options
    tjkilliantjkillian Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭
    Poor strike, uneven color. I will guess:

    MS-63BN

    Tom
    Tom

  • Options
    au58au58 Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭
    64bn
  • Options
    RedneckHBRedneckHB Posts: 20,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
    50
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • Options
    shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    I'll give this one last try.

    Please, someone explain the obvious wear on the ONE CENT of this coin. And the weird wavey surfaces in the fields, the greenish brown color...
  • Options
    Shylock

    This is one of my Indianheads that Russ has been imaging the past few days. It's a mid-grade with one of the worst reverse strikes in my collection of Indianheads. The waviness is just toning and it just gives the appearance of having of being hit by a steamroller. The weak lettering adds to the illusion.
    Oh boy...this could be a bad thing.........image
    image
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    The other problem with this one is that it's severely cadiwampus in an old fatty slab. With the thickness of the NGC insert and the shadowing caused by the sharp angle, lots of shadows and imaging artifacts get created.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    DMWJRDMWJR Posts: 6,108 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'll give this one last try.

    Please, someone explain the obvious wear on the ONE CENT of this coin. And the weird wavey surfaces in the fields, the greenish brown color... >>



    image
    Doug
  • Options
    Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146 ✭
    63bn
  • Options
    ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,743 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This date is not weakly struck. You are looking at wear.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • Options
    AU 55
    JRH
  • Options
    LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,711 ✭✭✭✭✭
    63BN
    Gone but not forgotten: IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal, CoinsAreFun.
  • Options
    I'm pretty much wrong every single time but I'll go with MS60.
    image
  • Options
    IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    So what is the grade?
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 36,023 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS-63, Brown. There are some "residue traces" from the lifting of some crud, as Civil War token collectors put it, below the "ONE CENT" which downgrade it a point or two. I'll guess MS-63 because most MS-63's have a very tacky look to them, this is reasonably pleasent despite the minor problem.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,720 ✭✭✭
    It looks like it has some rub on it. I am not sure if it is truly there, though. I was going to say AU-58, but my first impression was MS-62BN.
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • Options
    the main problem I see is the weak strike - beads are almost invisible and diamonds are very weak. I don't think either of these are due to wear.

    otherwise it appears problem fee.
  • Options
    I was going to say 58 too, but after Russ's coments about image artifacts and such I'll say 63BN.
  • Options
    BigMooseBigMoose Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭
    64 Bn
    TomT-1794

    Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org
  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,260 ✭✭✭✭✭
    AU50. Not much of a coin.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    It's graded MS65BN.

    Russ, NCNE
  • Options
    JJMJJM Posts: 8,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    oh my !!!!
    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly, justindan
  • Options
    rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,651 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Given the nature of the forum members, I'm surprised there weren't any guesses of XF-45. I'd grade it AU58, personally, due to some circulation ticks on the face and friction on the ribbon.

    Is it a PCGS or NGC coin?
  • Options
    IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    NGC its typed under the photo, its in a fatty slab. Anyone who owns IHC's that look like this I will pay XF45 money for them. It's not a 65 for sure.
  • Options
    I just can't see that being a 65... but then again we are talking NGC
    Either write something worth reading or do something worth writing about. -Benjamin Franklin-
  • Options
    TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,112 ✭✭✭
    Mint State 60 Brown!

    TorinoCobra71


    image
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I just can't see that being a 65... but then again we are talking NGC >>



    image
    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    This is one of my Indianheads that Russ has been imaging the past few days. It's a mid-grade with one of the worst reverse strikes in my collection of Indianheads. The waviness is just toning and it just gives the appearance of having of being hit by a steamroller. The weak lettering adds to the illusion.

    The steamroller effect is very effective with this coin image

    AmericanCopper -- You provided some wonderful coins in all these Russ IH threads. And he did a wonderful job with them.
  • Options
    Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146 ✭
    << I just can't see that being a 65... but then again we are talking NGC >>
    image

    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file