Grade this coin

You shelled out your 50 bucks for the World Series of Grading and the first coin they toss in front of you is this one. You have 10 seconds.



Paul <> altered surfaces <> CoinGallery.org
0
Comments
Cameron Kiefer
Russ, NCNE
66RB
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
MS66RD
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
Free Trial
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” Mark Twain
Newmismatist
Tom
Jade Rare Coin eBay Listings
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
The Lincoln cent store:
http://www.lincolncent.com
My numismatic art work:
http://www.cdaughtrey.com
USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
Cameron Kiefer
<< <i>What's the real grade? >>
Didn't you read my grade?
Russ, NCNE
A few years ago I handed a couple of NGC graded 1869 Indians that looked like this that were in NGC MS-64, R&B holders. That's a decent "net market" grade IMO, but I doubt that you will see many of those coins on the market these days. They've been cracked and upgraded.
Yes I did. You are the new guy on the grading team and as the head grader, I defaulted your grade to match everyone elses.
Cameron Kiefer
Quality-wise, the coin looks super nice, easily 65 and perhaps higher.
Color-wise, it looks like a "RB"/"RD" liner, though original, either way.
I don't think it will receive the benefit of the doubt for both grade and color, so I'll kick it out of the 66RD classification.
I hope it doesn't get slammed as only a 64RD or a 64RB.
Based on the above opinions and reasoning, I'll go with 65RD. I'd be ok with 66RB or 65RB as my next, compromise choices.
This grade / color dilemma for copper coinage brings up, what I think is an interesting and important consideration - I believe that the major grading services often reach compromise grades / color designations for certain copper coins.
For example, if you have an MS65 / MS66 liner that is also a "RB" / "RD" liner, typically the coin will receive the benefit of the doubt for grade OR color but NOT both. And, hopefully it will not be left out in the cold for both grade and color possibilities. Perhaps we can have more on that in another thread and I hope these comments and opinions are not off topic here.
Edited to say... What exactly is that stuff around the date and will it cause a bodybag?
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
<< <i>For example, if you have an MS65 / MS66 liner that is also a "RB" / "RD" liner, typically the coin will receive the benefit of the doubt for grade OR color but NOT both. >>
Mark,
They do the same thing with liner brilliant/cameo or liner CAM/DCAM proofs. I have several resubmission examples of that. Might be 67DCAM on one submission, 68CAM on the next or vice-versa.
Russ, NCNE
Area around date looks like toning breaks - not a major distraction.
<< <i>Coinguy - you typed all that in 10 seconds? >>
Tim, I confess - I took WAY more than 10 seconds to type that. But, I "graded" it (correctly or otherwise) in about 2 seconds.
Cameron Kiefer
MS-67 RB
<< <i>I GOTTA KNOW!!!!!!!! >>
I already do know.
Russ, NCNE