Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

eBay Authenticity Guarantee Program, now for coins

124

Comments

  • Options
    OnlyGoldIsMoneyOnlyGoldIsMoney Posts: 3,575 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @IkesT said:
    Surprising that we haven't heard an announcement about this directly from PCGS:

    https://www.ebayinc.com/stories/news/ebay-authenticity-guarantee-collectible-coins/

    PCGS announced the upcoming cooperative arrangement with ebay at the August 26th Registry Set Awards event at Pittsburgh ANA. Once the show is over I imagine PCGS will make a comprehensive announcement regarding ebay authentification and other notable changes.

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,736 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What happens when the eBay authentication center (PCGS) gets a counterfeit coin in a counterfeit PCGS slab? Will PCGS return it to the seller or will they destroy it? Suggest that PCGS should have a branding iron to burn "FAKE" into the slab if eBay wants them to return it to the seller.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    What happens when the eBay authentication center (PCGS) gets a counterfeit coin in a counterfeit PCGS slab? Will PCGS return it to the seller or will they destroy it? Suggest that PCGS should have a branding iron to burn "FAKE" into the slab if eBay wants them to return it to the seller.

    It's an interesting question.

    From the eBay information page:

    What if the item does not pass inspection?
    If the authenticator cannot verify the item's authenticity or if the item is not consistent with its listing, you will be issued a full refund to your original payment method. If a certified holder is found to be fake or exhibit signs of tampering, the item will not pass inspection and the certification will be deactivated.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    "What happens when the eBay authentication center (PCGS) gets a counterfeit coin in a counterfeit PCGS slab? Will PCGS return it to the seller or will they destroy it?"

    Suppose you unknowingly sold such a coin. What would you prefer- to have PCGS destroy it or return it to you so you could return it to the person you bought it from for a refund?

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 28, 2026 3:02PM

    @MasonG said:
    "What happens when the eBay authentication center (PCGS) gets a counterfeit coin in a counterfeit PCGS slab? Will PCGS return it to the seller or will they destroy it?"

    Suppose you unknowingly sold such a coin. What would you prefer- to have PCGS destroy it or return it to you so you could return it to the person you bought it from for a refund?

    I agree. However, you have PCGS in possession of a "counterfeit" slab. If PCGS is not pursuing enforcement of their IP, then I think they need to return it. I'm not as sure, however, that they couldn't keep it and pursue a case.

    I would guess they would choose to return it. They don't seem interested in devoting resources into going after the fakes. But it is a rather interesting situation because they would suddenly find themselves, as the wronged party, in possession of the item that inflicted the wrong.

    It's possibly different than their having a counterfeit coin or CAC having a PCGS slab that's fake.

    Lawyers?

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    I'm not as sure, however, that they couldn't keep it and pursue a case.

    This is the part that seems problematic. What do you call it when someone takes and keeps something that belongs to someone else?

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,736 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MasonG said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    I'm not as sure, however, that they couldn't keep it and pursue a case.

    This is the part that seems problematic. What do you call it when someone takes and keeps something that belongs to someone else?

    Confiscation of illegal contraband.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:

    @MasonG said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    I'm not as sure, however, that they couldn't keep it and pursue a case.

    This is the part that seems problematic. What do you call it when someone takes and keeps something that belongs to someone else?

    Confiscation of illegal contraband.

    Well, I sort of agree. But that's why I think they could only do that if they are actually pursuing a case. They have no legal right to seize "contraband" themselves. They aren't law enforcement.

    @MasonG said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    I'm not as sure, however, that they couldn't keep it and pursue a case.

    This is the part that seems problematic. What do you call it when someone takes and keeps something that belongs to someone else?

    That's why I said it need to be part of a legal action. I don't think they have any right to simply seize it. They aren't law enforcement. They MIGHT have the right to hold it and launch legal action. I don't really know.

    If someone brings a stolen car to a garage, can't the garage hold the car and call the authorities? They microchip dogs and cats and the vets call the authorities if the scan demonstrates the dog was stolen, they don't simply hand it back to the person who brought it in.

    But I don't know, maybe one of our lawyers does.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    They have no legal right to seize "contraband" themselves. They aren't law enforcement.

    That's what I was thinking. There's no reason they couldn't work with the owner of the item in order to initiate legal action while protecting the owner's ability to persue their own remedy, is there?

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MasonG said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    They have no legal right to seize "contraband" themselves. They aren't law enforcement.

    That's what I was thinking. There's no reason they couldn't work with the owner of the item in order to initiate legal action while protecting the owner's ability to persue their own remedy, is there?

    No. I just don't think they are likely to bother.

    I wonder if they will be able to see who the sellers are. They might go after repeat offenders. I can't imagine they will bother for one-offs.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    JDarkJDark Posts: 59 ✭✭✭
    edited August 29, 2026 12:27PM

    I am watching this one since it sold and both eBay and the seller ignored my warnings:



  • Options
    2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What if the item does not pass inspection?
    If the authenticator cannot verify the item's authenticity or if the item is not consistent with its listing, you will be issued a full refund to your original payment method. If a certified holder is found to be fake or exhibit signs of tampering, the item will not pass inspection and the certification will be deactivated.

    Another twist here is that quite often a legitimate cert number is used to produce fake slabs, if PCGS deactivates the cert what happens to the guy with the legit coin?

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 30, 2026 8:30AM

    @2windy2fish said:
    What if the item does not pass inspection?
    If the authenticator cannot verify the item's authenticity or if the item is not consistent with its listing, you will be issued a full refund to your original payment method. If a certified holder is found to be fake or exhibit signs of tampering, the item will not pass inspection and the certification will be deactivated.

    Another twist here is that quite often a legitimate cert number is used to produce fake slabs, if PCGS deactivates the cert what happens to the guy with the legit coin?

    PCGS already does this. Nothing new here.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 9,835 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you list a gold or silver coin in the bullion category will it still have to be sent out if it is worth over $500? I'm assuming not:

    "Eligibility Details Bullion Exclusion: According to EcommerceBytes, items listed specifically in the bullion category are completely excluded from the coin authentication mandate. Collectible Coins: Eligible U.S. and World graded or raw collectible coins priced at $500 or more outside of the bullion category qualify for professional inspection through the eBay Authenticity Guarantee program".

  • Options
    JDarkJDark Posts: 59 ✭✭✭
    edited August 31, 2026 2:43AM

    A different example- a terrible counterfeit in a better fake PCGS slab. "Slash the eagle" and wrong reverse for the date and mint...

    Seller started the bidding under the threshold at $499; it is now above the $500 minimum, but the listing is not marked "Authenticity guarantee". Will it be covered after the sale?

  • Options
    TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 484 ✭✭✭✭

    @JDark said:
    A different example- a terrible counterfeit in a better fake PCGS slab. "Slash the eagle" and wrong reverse for the date and mint...

    Seller started the bidding under the threshold at $499; it is now above the $500 minimum, but the listing is not marked "Authenticity guarantee". Will it be covered after the sale?

    I think it depends. Ebay is rolling out the program in steps. Not all eligible coins or sellers are covered under it yet.

  • Options
    JDarkJDark Posts: 59 ✭✭✭

    The Bay did send me this on the 1878-CC:

  • Options
    jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,990 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Copied from a similar thread so it can get seen on this one:

    Yeah, I herd it was coming, but wasnt sure the exact date when it took affected, or more importantly, didnt pay attention, I had sold a raw 2 1/2 indian on ebay last week that crossed threshold, shipped it out last wed via regular ground advantage, just arrived today, has not yet shown recieved by authenticator as of me typing now. Hopefully tomorrow, turn around time is going to be the big question. Later in week, I sold three PCGS graded coins that crossed the threshold, they were already listed before I was aware, they had just got graded at pcgs after 3 months, and now they are on the way back to pcgs authenticator. jeeze. I sent these fedex as I have been doing on higher dollar value packages due to mail theft, will see if this speeds up the process, as for me its going from east coast to west coast and back to east coast in many cases. I am also curious if pcgs authenticators are going to fedex back to buyer as I have or cheap out and use slow mo mail. a big question I have as well. Will update as to how process goes. I put a notice on ebay to my customers letting them know whats going on in lamon terms with this new process. I also may not sell 500 items for the near future until I see how it goes as well. I can see GC getting a heck of a lot of business now on 500 up items.

    Update to my earlier post:

    the 2 1/2 indian (raw) was recieved this am, in about an hour 1/2 later, verified and shipped to buyer, also shipping fedex, so at this early stage , they appear to be on top of things. Thats good. Ill let you know when the 3 other coins that were shipped fedex arrive and process, they were already graded by pcgs

  • Options
    jacrispiesjacrispies Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My first item was authenticated. Shipped from AZ to CA (PCGS) in three days, verified in 38 minutes, now on its way to TX via Fedex. This process does double the shipping time, worse if the buyer and seller are on the east coast. Either way, shipping time is overall generally expedient so no complaints.

    I'm glad the verification process itself was quick. Hopefully this department doesn't get backed up over time. I can't imagine that happening. I wonder how PCGS's hiring and training was for this venture; if they are well equipped, team size, etc.

    "But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you" Matthew 6:33. Young fellow suffering from Bust Half fever.
    BHNC #AN-10
    JRCS #1606

  • Options
    relicsncoinsrelicsncoins Posts: 8,300 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Curious to see how they handle an un-attributed variety that adds a significant premium to the coin.

    Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions
  • Options
    safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 698 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I keep wondering who will absorb the shipping/handling/insurance fees on these coins? We already pay enough for our personal coins that we send in, and it certainly isn’t cheap by any means. So people selling high $ items that offer ridiculously low/free shipping fees on eBay won’t get hurt by this?

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @safari_dude said:
    I keep wondering who will absorb the shipping/handling/insurance fees on these coins? We already pay enough for our personal coins that we send in, and it certainly isn’t cheap by any means. So people selling high $ items that offer ridiculously low/free shipping fees on eBay won’t get hurt by this?

    Ebay pays out of the fees they collect. They've been doing it with cards for almost 5 years. Read my earlier posts for links.

    Shipping fees are irrelevant.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @2windy2fish said:
    What if the item does not pass inspection?
    If the authenticator cannot verify the item's authenticity or if the item is not consistent with its listing, you will be issued a full refund to your original payment method. If a certified holder is found to be fake or exhibit signs of tampering, the item will not pass inspection and the certification will be deactivated.
    Another twist here is that quite often a legitimate cert number is used to produce fake slabs, if PCGS deactivates the cert what happens to the guy with the legit coin?

    @jmlanzaf I don’t understand your response…
    Somewhere the legit coin exists with a real cert number, the counterfeiter uses that cert number and makes bogus coins…If PCGS deactivates the cert number the owner of the real coin now has a bad cert number…

    PCGS already does this. Nothing new here.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @2windy2fish said:
    @2windy2fish said:
    What if the item does not pass inspection?
    If the authenticator cannot verify the item's authenticity or if the item is not consistent with its listing, you will be issued a full refund to your original payment method. If a certified holder is found to be fake or exhibit signs of tampering, the item will not pass inspection and the certification will be deactivated.
    Another twist here is that quite often a legitimate cert number is used to produce fake slabs, if PCGS deactivates the cert what happens to the guy with the legit coin?

    @jmlanzaf I don’t understand your response…
    Somewhere the legit coin exists with a real cert number, the counterfeiter uses that cert number and makes bogus coins…If PCGS deactivates the cert number the owner of the real coin now has a bad cert number…

    PCGS already does this. Nothing new here.

    I fully understand that. But PCGS already invalidates certification numbers when counterfeits appear with that number. This is not a new action.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @2windy2fish said:
    @2windy2fish said:
    What if the item does not pass inspection?
    If the authenticator cannot verify the item's authenticity or if the item is not consistent with its listing, you will be issued a full refund to your original payment method. If a certified holder is found to be fake or exhibit signs of tampering, the item will not pass inspection and the certification will be deactivated.
    Another twist here is that quite often a legitimate cert number is used to produce fake slabs, if PCGS deactivates the cert what happens to the guy with the legit coin?

    @jmlanzaf I don’t understand your response…
    Somewhere the legit coin exists with a real cert number, the counterfeiter uses that cert number and makes bogus coins…If PCGS deactivates the cert number the owner of the real coin now has a bad cert number…

    PCGS already does this. Nothing new here.

    I fully understand that. But PCGS already invalidates certification numbers when counterfeits appear with that number. This is not a new action.

    I'm pretty sure in that case you contact PCGS CS and they will have you send it in. Once they re-authenticate the coin I'm pretty sure they'll reholder it for you with a new cert, probably for free.

  • Options
    Project NumismaticsProject Numismatics Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MasonG said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    They have no legal right to seize "contraband" themselves. They aren't law enforcement.

    That's what I was thinking. There's no reason they couldn't work with the owner of the item in order to initiate legal action while protecting the owner's ability to persue their own remedy, is there?

    Legal action against who? Many sellers will be unaware the slab they sold is fake. Many eBay sellers are not experienced or sophisticated (and we’ve seen instances in this forum where even the largest auction houses were fooled). How would PCGS ever prove who actually created the fake? Some fakes will have passed through many hands.

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    "Legal action against who?"

    I don't know. I was responding to the idea that PCGS might "seize "contraband" themselves", which would seem to indicate a possibility of legal action on the part of PCGS.

    "Many sellers will be unaware the slab they sold is fake. Many eBay sellers are not experienced or sophisticated (and we’ve seen instances in this forum where even the largest auction houses were fooled)."

    Sure, that's true.

    "How would PCGS ever prove who actually created the fake?"

    I don't know.

    "Some fakes will have passed through many hands."

    All the more reason to not seize counterfeits as contraband and instead return them to their owners- in order that those owners might have an opportunity to return the counterfeits to the people they bought them from and obtain a refund.

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,736 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I can see PCGS taking legal action in concert with the FBI against a specific eBay seller who is selling dozens of fake coins in the same fake PCGS slab thus establishing an obvious pattern of fraud.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    JDarkJDark Posts: 59 ✭✭✭

    Classic def of insanity; can't get eBay to acknowledge it is fake and there is no guarantee. Bid over $2.5K and still running...

  • Options
    TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 484 ✭✭✭✭

    For Authenticity Guarantee coins, the minimum amount that requires signature delivery is set at $1,500. An increase from the previous amount of $750 before the program.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TrickleCharge said:
    For Authenticity Guarantee coins, the minimum amount that requires signature delivery is set at $1,500. An increase from the previous amount of $750 before the program.

    Probably using PCGS insurance.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 484 ✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @TrickleCharge said:
    For Authenticity Guarantee coins, the minimum amount that requires signature delivery is set at $1,500. An increase from the previous amount of $750 before the program.

    Probably using PCGS insurance.

    Either way it should save sellers a few bucks on shipping costs by not having to pay for signature delivery between $750 and $1500.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TrickleCharge said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @TrickleCharge said:
    For Authenticity Guarantee coins, the minimum amount that requires signature delivery is set at $1,500. An increase from the previous amount of $750 before the program.

    Probably using PCGS insurance.

    Either way it should save sellers a few bucks on shipping costs by not having to pay for signature delivery between $750 and $1500.

    Yes, if you're using your own insurance. If you use USPS insurance, signature is free above $499 insurance.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just sold my first coin through the program. It works out for me because Priority mail from PHX to LA is less than the flat rate carrier packaging. Small victories.

  • Options
    JDarkJDark Posts: 59 ✭✭✭

    I purchased this one; real-time test for me:

  • Options
    ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 8,049 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I sold a coin last week. It was delivered on Saturday. Today on Monday (Labor Day) I got a notice that it has been authenticated and packed up for shipping already. I have to admit I'm impressed with the speed and the fact that they are even working on holidays.

  • Options
    HeubschgoldHeubschgold Posts: 360 ✭✭✭

    I like the notion of "authentication" before it ships out to the final buyer destination. It helps.

    Another option would be this machine for home use:

    https://www.indiegogo.com/en/projects/1052rick/computer-coin-grading-machine

  • Options

    Lawyer here. First of all, this all likely governed by the ebay user agreement and Authenticity Guarantee T&C which is at the bottom of this page, but I only skimmed it. But here is how the law views the three categories:

    1: The coin can't be authenticated/is not as described The coin would be sent back to the seller, purchase canceled, buyer refunded, seller debited. Pretty straightforwardly governed by the Terms and Conditions without much legal implication.

    2: The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeit This is where things get interesting. Under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 25 it is a federal crime to knowingly mail counterfeit currency. Section 492 makes the counterfeit coins immediately forfeitable to the authorities (in this case the Secret Service), and that's what would happen. For people saying PCGS can't seize property that's not theirs, they would not be seizing it themselves, they would be "holding for disposal" and the authorities would dispose. If you really wanted to get into the weeds, the seller cannot maintain a conversion or replevin action to recover contraband, because there is no legally protectable possessory interest in property you cannot own.

    3: The holder is counterfeit This gets into trademark law (18 U.S.C. § 2320), civil infringement under Lanham, and provisions under the 2014 Hobby Protection Act. Essentially, because PCGS would presumably be the injured party here, they have wide latitude to seize, destroy, and recover damages.

    There is a permutation here where it's a real coin in the wrong holder, and eBay seems to say that coin could re-slabbed and sent to the buyer, but I sort of doubt this.

    Of course, practicality must be measured in all this. Secret Service/DOJ is only going to get involved if things are happening at serious scale or $ amount.

    TLDR: 1.) A coin that isn't as described or can't be verified gets sent back to seller 2.) An affirmatively fake coin/holder gets confiscated and destroyed (by PCGS for holder and authorities for coin) and 3.) a real coin in a fake holder supposedly gets reslabbed.

  • Options
    mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 7,306 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 8, 2026 7:00AM

    @dval2929 ✭ wrote:
    2:The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeitThis is where things get interesting. Under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 25 it is a federal crime to knowingly mail counterfeit currency. Section 492 makes the counterfeit coins immediately forfeitable to the authorities (in this case the Secret Service), and that's what would happen. For people saying PCGS can't seize property that's not theirs, they would not be seizing it themselves, they would be "holding for disposal" and the authorities would dispose. If you really wanted to get into the weeds, the seller cannot maintain a conversion or replevin action to recover contraband, because there is no legally protectable possessory interest in property you cannot own.

    And then there is 4:The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeit in an identified as genuine holder

    What happens?

    A human being is a part of the whole called by us universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feeling as something separated from the rest, a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.

    Albert Einstein

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dval2929 said:
    Lawyer here. First of all, this all likely governed by the ebay user agreement and Authenticity Guarantee T&C which is at the bottom of this page, but I only skimmed it. But here is how the law views the three categories:

    1: The coin can't be authenticated/is not as described The coin would be sent back to the seller, purchase canceled, buyer refunded, seller debited. Pretty straightforwardly governed by the Terms and Conditions without much legal implication.

    2: The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeit This is where things get interesting. Under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 25 it is a federal crime to knowingly mail counterfeit currency. Section 492 makes the counterfeit coins immediately forfeitable to the authorities (in this case the Secret Service), and that's what would happen. For people saying PCGS can't seize property that's not theirs, they would not be seizing it themselves, they would be "holding for disposal" and the authorities would dispose. If you really wanted to get into the weeds, the seller cannot maintain a conversion or replevin action to recover contraband, because there is no legally protectable possessory interest in property you cannot own.

    3: The holder is counterfeit This gets into trademark law (18 U.S.C. § 2320), civil infringement under Lanham, and provisions under the 2014 Hobby Protection Act. Essentially, because PCGS would presumably be the injured party here, they have wide latitude to seize, destroy, and recover damages.

    There is a permutation here where it's a real coin in the wrong holder, and eBay seems to say that coin could re-slabbed and sent to the buyer, but I sort of doubt this.

    Of course, practicality must be measured in all this. Secret Service/DOJ is only going to get involved if things are happening at serious scale or $ amount.

    TLDR: 1.) A coin that isn't as described or can't be verified gets sent back to seller 2.) An affirmatively fake coin/holder gets confiscated and destroyed (by PCGS for holder and authorities for coin) and 3.) a real coin in a fake holder supposedly gets reslabbed.

    Awesome! Thanks so much...

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 7,306 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dval2929 ✭ wrote:
    2:The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeitThis is where things get interesting. Under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 25 it is a federal crime to knowingly mail counterfeit currency. Section 492 makes the counterfeit coins immediately forfeitable to the authorities (in this case the Secret Service), and that's what would happen. For people saying PCGS can't seize property that's not theirs, they would not be seizing it themselves, they would be "holding for disposal" and the authorities would dispose. If you really wanted to get into the weeds, the seller cannot maintain a conversion or replevin action to recover contraband, because there is no legally protectable possessory interest in property you cannot own.

    And then there is 4:The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeit in an identified as genuine holder

    What happens?

    I would presume that the short answer to the admittedly rare scenario of 4:The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeit in an identified as genuine holder that the situation would revert to 1:The coin can't be authenticated/is not as described The coin would be sent back to the seller, purchase canceled, buyer refunded, seller debited. Pretty straightforwardly governed by the Terms and Conditions without much legal implication.

    Is this correct except there could be more than "not much" legal implication, as you say?

    A human being is a part of the whole called by us universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feeling as something separated from the rest, a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.

    Albert Einstein

  • Options
    Desert MoonDesert Moon Posts: 6,466 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    I can see PCGS taking legal action in concert with the FBI against a specific eBay seller who is selling dozens of fake coins in the same fake PCGS slab thus establishing an obvious pattern of fraud.

    So what are they waiting for? There has been known frauds on ebay for what, decades? Why now all of a sudden?

    My online coin store - https://desertmoonnm.com/
  • Options

    @Desert Moon said:

    @PerryHall said:
    I can see PCGS taking legal action in concert with the FBI against a specific eBay seller who is selling dozens of fake coins in the same fake PCGS slab thus establishing an obvious pattern of fraud.

    So what are they waiting for? There has been known frauds on ebay for what, decades? Why now all of a sudden?

    I think this is accurate. Any fraud at scale, especially perpetrated against PCGS specifically, would gain the attention of SS/FBI. Especially with a motivated company gathering the evidence...

  • Options

    @mr1931S said:

    @dval2929 ✭ wrote:
    2:The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeitThis is where things get interesting. Under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 25 it is a federal crime to knowingly mail counterfeit currency. Section 492 makes the counterfeit coins immediately forfeitable to the authorities (in this case the Secret Service), and that's what would happen. For people saying PCGS can't seize property that's not theirs, they would not be seizing it themselves, they would be "holding for disposal" and the authorities would dispose. If you really wanted to get into the weeds, the seller cannot maintain a conversion or replevin action to recover contraband, because there is no legally protectable possessory interest in property you cannot own.

    And then there is 4:The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeit in an identified as genuine holder

    What happens?

    I would presume that the short answer to the admittedly rare scenario of 4:The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeit in an identified as genuine holder that the situation would revert to 1:The coin can't be authenticated/is not as described The coin would be sent back to the seller, purchase canceled, buyer refunded, seller debited. Pretty straightforwardly governed by the Terms and Conditions without much legal implication.

    Is this correct except there could be more than "not much" legal implication, as you say?

    No, this isn't correct. Once the coin is determined to be counterfeit, nobody can ship it without violating several federal laws. It gets held for disposal.

    There may also be a tautological issue with your question: A genuine holder with a counterfeit coin might not exist. Because the holder is describing the coin it contains, and no service will holder a counterfeit coin, ergo there cannot be a genuine holder describing the counterfeit coin it contains without the holder itself becoming inauthentic or tampered with, by definition. Not 100% sure on that one, it's getting late :smile:

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dval2929 said:
    A genuine holder with a counterfeit coin might not exist.

    I have seen one. It was sent back to the grading service so I'm pretty sure it no longer exists but that doesn't mean others don't.

    FWIW...

  • Options
    JDarkJDark Posts: 59 ✭✭✭

    This one will be interesting; bad counterfeit "Morgan" Morgan in a fake PCGS slab. I notified the seller and he ended the listing only to relist it with the new authenticity guarantee and the TrueView images of the genuine example for the cert #,

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/287573124950

    And now sold, I guess PCGS gets a chance to see it...

  • Options
    JDarkJDark Posts: 59 ✭✭✭

    @MasonG said:

    @dval2929 said:
    A genuine holder with a counterfeit coin might not exist.

    I have seen one. It was sent back to the grading service so I'm pretty sure it no longer exists but that doesn't mean others don't.

    FWIW...

    I have several in my collection...

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JDark said:

    @MasonG said:

    @dval2929 said:
    A genuine holder with a counterfeit coin might not exist.

    I have seen one. It was sent back to the grading service so I'm pretty sure it no longer exists but that doesn't mean others don't.

    FWIW...

    I have several in my collection...

    I'm not surprised. Nobody's perfect, after all. People make mistakes.

  • Options
    MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 40,015 ✭✭✭✭✭

    authentic holder + counterfeit coin? mistakes have been made!

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • Options
    mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 7,306 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 8, 2026 11:04PM

    @dval2929 said:

    @mr1931S said:

    @dval2929 ✭ wrote:
    2:The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeitThis is where things get interesting. Under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 25 it is a federal crime to knowingly mail counterfeit currency. Section 492 makes the counterfeit coins immediately forfeitable to the authorities (in this case the Secret Service), and that's what would happen. For people saying PCGS can't seize property that's not theirs, they would not be seizing it themselves, they would be "holding for disposal" and the authorities would dispose. If you really wanted to get into the weeds, the seller cannot maintain a conversion or replevin action to recover contraband, because there is no legally protectable possessory interest in property you cannot own.

    And then there is 4:The coin itself is af :* firmatively determined to be a counterfeit in an identified as genuine holder

    What happens?

    I would presume that the short answer to the admittedly rare scenario of 4:The coin itself is affirmatively determined to be a counterfeit in an identified as genuine holder that the situation would revert to 1:The coin can't be authenticated/is not as described The coin would be sent back to the seller, purchase canceled, buyer refunded, seller debited. Pretty straightforwardly governed by the Terms and Conditions without much legal implication.

    Is this correct except there could be more than "not much" legal implication, as you say?

    No, this isn't correct. Once the coin is determined to be counterfeit, nobody can ship it without violating several federal laws. It gets held for disposal.

    There may also be a tautological issue with your question: A genuine holder with a counterfeit coin might not exist. Because the holder is describing the coin it contains, and no service will holder a counterfeit coin, ergo there cannot be a genuine holder describing the counterfeit coin it contains without the holder itself becoming inauthentic or tampered with, by definition. Not 100% sure on that one, it's getting late :smile:

    @MasonG said:

    @dval2929 said:
    A genuine holder with a counterfeit coin might not exist.

    I have seen one. It was sent back to the grading service so I'm pretty sure it no longer exists but that doesn't mean others don't.

    FWIW...

    @dval2929 wrote:
    no service will holder a counterfeit coin

    No service will knowingly holder a counterfeit coin.

    Counterfeit/altered coin in genuine untampered-with holder does exist and has existed. :*

    A human being is a part of the whole called by us universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feeling as something separated from the rest, a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.

    Albert Einstein

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file