Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Reverse Proof coins......

mach19mach19 Posts: 4,715 ✭✭✭✭

I prefer the regular proof coins over these..... However that's only my opinion .

Your opinion ?

TIN SOLDIERS & NIXON COMING image

Comments

  • Options
    PapiNEPapiNE Posts: 452 ✭✭✭✭

    I bought the 2023 reverse proofs and instantly disliked them when in-hand. Never again. I also prefer a frosty strike vs proof.

    USAF veteran 1984-2005

  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 32,219 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Regular proofs always worked for me

  • Options
    mach19mach19 Posts: 4,715 ✭✭✭✭

    @johnny9434 said:
    Regular proofs always worked for me

    I couldn't agree with you more !

    TIN SOLDIERS & NIXON COMING image
  • Options
    mach19mach19 Posts: 4,715 ✭✭✭✭

    @PapiNE said:
    I bought the 2023 reverse proofs and instantly disliked them when in-hand. Never again. I also prefer a frosty strike vs proof.

    I'm with you as well my friend !

    TIN SOLDIERS & NIXON COMING image
  • Options
    The_Dinosaur_ManThe_Dinosaur_Man Posts: 1,501 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like them. I would buy annual sets if they were made and available.

    Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
    Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you.
    https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,368 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like them!

  • Options
    Rc5280Rc5280 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭✭✭

    ...

  • Options
    P0CKETCHANGEP0CKETCHANGE Posts: 3,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m a fan of reverse proofs, especially on coins with big fields. Here is my RP PR70 AI dollar:



    I actually like the enhanced uncirculated finishes better, although admittedly I’m unsure what the difference is from a reverse proof. I’m guessing the devices are not as heavily polished which gives them a more muted effect, and the rims are unpolished. Here’s my SP69 Sac:

    Nothing is as expensive as free money.

  • Options
    MWallaceMWallace Posts: 4,631 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm in the "I Like Them" group.

  • Options
    PickledThrickelsPickledThrickels Posts: 121 ✭✭✭✭

    I prefer regular proofs but I do think they're quite nice. I wish they'd issue more Enhanced UNC coins though. The 2017 set was great

  • Options
    MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 39,407 ✭✭✭✭✭

    only in cases where the shine doesn't obliterate the details. that sac is ok

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,368 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 10, 2026 9:17PM

    @P0CKETCHANGE - the enhanced UNCs have areas in the devices that aren't fully polished.

    See a comparison below:

    Reverse Proof:

    2017 S Enchanted Unc:

  • Options
    P0CKETCHANGEP0CKETCHANGE Posts: 3,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FlyingAl said:
    @P0CKETCHANGE - the enchanted UNCs have areas in the devices that aren't fully polished.

    Alex, I haven’t come across any “enchanted” UNCs 😉, but I will note that the Mohawk example I shared and the 2017 pictured above seem to have different finishes on the devices, whereby there is some contrast on the Mohawk coin.

    Nothing is as expensive as free money.

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,368 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @P0CKETCHANGE said:

    @FlyingAl said:
    @P0CKETCHANGE - the enchanted UNCs have areas in the devices that aren't fully polished.

    Alex, I haven’t come across any “enchanted” UNCs 😉, but I will note that the Mohawk example I shared and the 2017 pictured above seem to have different finishes on the devices, whereby there is some contrast on the Mohawk coin.

    Doh! Thanks!

    I also noted the slight difference in the finish between the Mohawk and the 2017 I noticed. The mint appears to have called them both enhanced unc, but the Mohawk does have much more mirror. Regardless, the polished areas are more of a wirebrush, and there are some frosted areas in the devices.

    Here's a 2014 comparison too:



  • Options
    BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,930 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like them the same as regular proofs..... which is not at all.

    Collecting things that are "made for collectors" turns me off a bit. I appreciate the beauty, and the coiner's art, but that's about it. RPs are just computer made gadgets.

  • Options
    Rc5280Rc5280 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PickledThrickels said:
    I prefer regular proofs but I do think they're quite nice. I wish they'd issue more Enhanced UNC coins though. The 2017 set was great

    Soon enough...

    1) SPRING: American Eagle 2026 One Ounce Silver Enhanced Uncirculated Coin, 26EG.

    2) SPRING: American Eagle 2026 One Ounce Gold Enhanced Uncirculated Coin, 26EH.

    3) SUMMER: Morgan Silver Dollar 2026 Enhanced Uncirculated Coin, 26XE.

    4) SUMMER: Peace Silver Dollar 2026 Enhanced Uncirculated Coin, 26XH.

    https://www.usmint.gov/product-schedule/2026/?prefn1=pastRelease&prefv1=false&start=0&sz=59

  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,779 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don’t care for reverse Proof coins at all. I think that they are unattractive. The only one in my collection, which I can remember, is a Roosevelt Dime which is in a Dr. Benjamin Spook commemorative coin set.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,967 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I bought the 2018 silver proof set. Last thing I bought from the mint. They are ok, but nothing to get excited about.

  • Options
    CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,432 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Call me old school. I do not care for reverse proofs at all and do not own any.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • Options
    lilolmelilolme Posts: 2,962 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PocketChange
    Do not know anything about them. A quick search and this pcgs article came up. If correct, then this paragraph kind of briefly sums it up.

    "But what exactly is an enhanced uncirculated coin? Essentially, it is one in which laser-engraving techniques are employed to create frosted, polished, and unpolished fields and devices that provide sharper contrasts between various elements of the design details. Each type of enhanced uncirculated coin has its own characteristics that exemplify this relatively new die-creation process."

    https://www.pcgs.com/news/what-is-an-enhanced-uncirculated-coin

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=hYCRaWPlTIE Sophie Lloyd, guitar shred cover of Panama (Van Halen)

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=dOV1VrDuUm4 Ted Nugent, Hibernation, Live 1976

    RLJ 1958 - 2023

  • Options
    lsicalsica Posts: 1,751 ✭✭✭✭

    I think of Reverse Proofs like I think of Pineapple Pizza. Some people like it. I'm not crazy about it, but I get why some people are. But if I'm ordering, it's not what I'm getting

    Philately will get you nowhere....
  • Options
    safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 559 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 12, 2026 3:27PM

    @lsica said:
    I think of Reverse Proofs like I think of Pineapple Pizza. Some people like it. I'm not crazy about it, but I get why some people are. But if I'm ordering, it's not what I'm getting

    lol….I love Hawaiian pizza….but understand that some think it’s a bit crazy. Now raw oysters are another thing….I mean they look downright nasty. The person who tried/discovered them must have cracked one open, took a look at it and thought, ‘wow! This looks like snot on the half shell, bet it tastes great!”…and slurped it on up. 🤪😂 But I like reverse proofs as long as the fields don’t have the ‘missing pixels’ so to speak on them. Those missing ‘pixels’ stand out like a scratch on a mirrored proof.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file