Your opinion versus PCGS, please, on the toning for this 1890-S silver dollar
TallahasseeCoinClub
Posts: 28 ✭✭
What looks like a hairline down the reverse is actually on the slab.
Official PCGS account of:
www.TallahasseeCoinClub.com
0
Comments
I think PCGS doesn't care for the "toning"
can you tell us what PCGS's opinion was?
+1
Possibly dipped and retoned. Heavy dip shadows and that purple color doesn't look NT.
What is the PCGS grade of this coin?
Appears AU / Toned
Looks like an excellent ms64 or a possible ms65.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
The sharply defined pull-away under the date and at top of "UNUM" indicate to me that the toning is original.
i'm uncomfortable with the purple/blue. the rest looks ok
It looks market acceptable to me. I wouldn’t be surprised by a QC details grade but that’s not what I’d call it.
QC also
I like the Obv, but the Rev colors throw me off a little. Probably QC for me also.
My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
https://n1m.com/bobbysmith1
Solid 65
Proud follower of Christ!
Purple and blue hues seem artificial.
Proud follower of Christ!
PCGS graded it MS-66! Thanks for the opinions!
Official PCGS account of:
www.TallahasseeCoinClub.com
Misleading title to this thread.
Whatever it is I would have dipped it before grading. I dont like the look of it.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
The toning is neutral in my opinion, although the blue on the back looks a bit off.
I would not have thought 66.
Collector, occasional seller
Fooled me. Although both sides are very clean from marks, the eye appeal is negative, esp. the reverse, for a 66, unless the photo does not do it justice.
MS66 seems reasonable to me. The toning looks balanced between warm and cool colors, with a bit of uneven lighting making the reverse look more blue. I wonder how many of the QC guesses were affected by the thread title hinting that PCGS deemed the toning artificial.
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled
Very colorful
Good for you..
Seriously, Good for you.
.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
What is cert number? Would be interested in seeing the Trueview
https://www.pcgs.com/cert/51340263
In my opinion, color is not particularly accurate in the TruView, making the coin appear orange when it is not.
Official PCGS account of:
www.TallahasseeCoinClub.com
By the way, apologies if the title was somehow misleading - that was not at all my intent.
Official PCGS account of:
www.TallahasseeCoinClub.com
That toning looks much nicer and NT, if asked grade for it would have guessed at least 65, Great looking coin. Would not have guessed dipped on that photo.
Wow! A world of difference in the photos. But I do like the look of the coin. Especially in the Tru View photos. I would love to see the coin in hand.
Seems like a gem, which is what a 66 is supposed to be, should wow and pop, creating at least a little excitement with the viewer. The ho hum, if not questionable, toning on this piece is nothing to write home about.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Looked good to me as a Gem, so I'm glad to see I was right.
EDITTED to add; Gawd those TV's look terrible.
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
True view picture is much nicer than the one you originally posted. It actually reminded me of a coin I owned quite awhile back that I kind regret letting go-