Why didn’t this walker sticker?

@BillJones said:
The initial eye appeal is good with the luster and the toning, but there are too many little marks in the field to qualify as a coin in that grade IMO.

Agree, the right field rules on walkers.

@Walkerlover said:

@lcoopie said:
The marks are tiny in hand unmagnified.

Coin is a solid or better 65, I knew it was the label or a surface issue.

If there had been a “surface issue”, the coin wouldn’t have been a “solid or better 65”.

@lcoopie said:

@TwoSides2aCoin said:

@MFeld said:

@TwoSides2aCoin said:
I can assure you of only one thing...... There are millions of collectors out there who don't care. They like the coin.

I can assure you that you can't accurately assure anyone that millions of collectors like the coin.

I can and I will. Do you like it , outside of the holder ?

Yes, and inside too 🤪

Well it was directed at Mark and since you were the one to answer, I'll tell you what I had reserved for him: "You are one in a million ", and I stand by my claim. At the end of the day, it's been liked by the original submitter and the buyer and I like it. That makes 3.