@BillJones said:
The initial eye appeal is good with the luster and the toning, but there are too many little marks in the field to qualify as a coin in that grade IMO.
@TwoSides2aCoin said:
I can assure you of only one thing...... There are millions of collectors out there who don't care. They like the coin.
I can assure you that you can't accurately assure anyone that millions of collectors like the coin.
I can and I will. Do you like it , outside of the holder ?
Yes, and inside too 🤪
Well it was directed at Mark and since you were the one to answer, I'll tell you what I had reserved for him: "You are one in a million ", and I stand by my claim. At the end of the day, it's been liked by the original submitter and the buyer and I like it. That makes 3.
Comments
Agree, the right field rules on walkers.
Me too! LOL The devil is in the details..
“I may not believe in myself but I believe in what I’m doing” ~Jimmy Page~
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
The marks are tiny in hand unmagnified.
Coin is a solid or better 65, I knew it was the label or a surface issue.
If there had been a “surface issue”, the coin wouldn’t have been a “solid or better 65”.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Yes I stand corrected. I meant if it failed CAC it wasn’t due to a issue with contact marks being to numerous
Well it was directed at Mark and since you were the one to answer, I'll tell you what I had reserved for him: "You are one in a million ", and I stand by my claim. At the end of the day, it's been liked by the original submitter and the buyer and I like it. That makes 3.
HE>I
I swear sometimes we just don’t see the forest for the trees.
Having fun while switching things up and focusing on a next level PCGS slabbed 1950+ type set, while still looking for great examples for the 7070.