Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1968 D DDR -001 ? calling all experts please

I know the saying, it must match perfectly to be the coin, well, for the most part, I think it does,( there lies the problem) I've seen enough Machine Doubling to beleive it is not that, but as I said, calling all experts, because I am not 100 % what do you all think?
Thanks in advance!

Comments

  • Options
    ifthevamzarockinifthevamzarockin Posts: 8,915 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Machine doubling. ;)

  • Options
    seanqseanq Posts: 8,836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Classic machine doubling, unfortunately. The listed variety shows more on E PLURIBUS UNUM. Here is a link to the Coppercoins page for the variety, it has great photos of both the reverse doubling and obverse die markers.

    Coppercoins link

    Sean Reynolds

    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • Options
    FrazFraz Posts: 2,118 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice photography. Welcome.

  • Options
    RinggyRinggy Posts: 62 ✭✭

    Oh well, I really thought I had something, I'll keep looking to find the one:) more to explore
    Thanks again!

  • Options
    OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 8,770 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • Options
    Steven59Steven59 Posts: 11,266 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No notching to be seen. A 68-D DDR is very hard to determine and yours is just too obvious of a MD example no matter how high the magnification pictures get.

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • Options
    MartinMartin Posts: 999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Fantastic photos. I’m going with machine doubling

    Martin

  • Options
    MarkKelleyMarkKelley Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Machine doubling. No notching of the serifs.

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Ringgy ... Definitely machine doubling.... Great pictures, you should add them to the thread on machine doubling examples. Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,769 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 27, 2023 4:02PM

    It's MDD. As an aside, 1968 was the last year the original obverse was used. The mint produced a new obverse for 1969.

    Look at how the lettering touches the rim, and the loss of detail over the last 59 years.

    It's sad, but I believe it was necessary.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file