1968 D DDR -001 ? calling all experts please
Ringgy
Posts: 57 ✭✭
I know the saying, it must match perfectly to be the coin, well, for the most part, I think it does,( there lies the problem) I've seen enough Machine Doubling to beleive it is not that, but as I said, calling all experts, because I am not 100 % what do you all think?
Thanks in advance!
0
Comments
Machine doubling.
Classic machine doubling, unfortunately. The listed variety shows more on E PLURIBUS UNUM. Here is a link to the Coppercoins page for the variety, it has great photos of both the reverse doubling and obverse die markers.
Coppercoins link
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
Nice photography. Welcome.
Oh well, I really thought I had something, I'll keep looking to find the one:) more to explore
Thanks again!
Your coin would fit perfectly here.
https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1088351/lets-see-some-machine-doubled-coins-i-know-there-are-some-wild-ones-out-there#latest
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
No notching to be seen. A 68-D DDR is very hard to determine and yours is just too obvious of a MD example no matter how high the magnification pictures get.
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"
Fantastic photos. I’m going with machine doubling
Martin
Machine doubling. No notching of the serifs.
@Ringgy ... Definitely machine doubling.... Great pictures, you should add them to the thread on machine doubling examples. Cheers, RickO
It's MDD. As an aside, 1968 was the last year the original obverse was used. The mint produced a new obverse for 1969.
Look at how the lettering touches the rim, and the loss of detail over the last 59 years.
It's sad, but I believe it was necessary.
Pete