Home U.S. Coin Forum

Well, this is interesting. And different.

dcarrdcarr Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭✭

I recently acquired this oddball. I have come to my own conclusion about it. I will let other folks make their comments before I reveal mine. About 18mm diameter. 2.5 grams.


Comments

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,904 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I wonder if it was successfully passed into circulation?

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I await the input of @dcarr.... That one is a strange one indeed. Cheers, RickO

  • LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,703 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oh My!

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 25,024 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Racketeer Dime

    Gilded to deceive and looks like it worked.

    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cool!

  • WAYNEASWAYNEAS Posts: 7,203 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I cannot even venture a guess.
    Let us know what the verdict is.
    Wayne

    Kennedys are my quest...

  • jayPemjayPem Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭✭✭

    At first I could only see the E's of the under type as small C's.. was thinking a CWT or something as the undertype..
    That's a super cool counterfeit all day long!
    🤯

  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,806 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Definitely a contemporary counterfeit, from hand-cut dies. I have an 1853 three cent piece with very similar looking 5 in the date. No idea why it was struck over a contemporary dime, maybe to test the dies before wasting a plated gold planchet?

    That is honestly kind of awesome, I would love to know the story behind it.

    Sean Reynolds

    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • Namvet69Namvet69 Posts: 9,405 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 17, 2022 12:05PM

    Any way to determine if there's any gold rinse still on the surfaces? Peace Roy

    BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW

  • numismanumisma Posts: 3,877 ✭✭✭✭

    Wow! That is super cool. I love the recut "8" in the date, and the stylization of the "5".

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,115 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @numisma said:
    Wow! That is super cool. I love the recut "8" in the date, and the stylization of the "5".

    Recut "8"! Doesn't that make it an "ERROR" and worth a fortune? ;)

    Seriously, a very interesting and unusual item. :)

    All glory is fleeting.
  • tokenprotokenpro Posts: 929 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The 1851 $2 1/2 gilded brass is one of the most commonly encountered contemporary struck counterfeits. It's often listed as a game counter in error as neither Kurth nor Fuld & Rulau included the 1851 in their works on game counters. That die pair has traveled around.

    Interesting piece. I noticed the OP mentioned the weight and diameter but nothing else...

  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall and @jonathanb pegged it right off. Not too difficult if you realize that the apparent "CO" on the cheek is actually part of an upside-down "DIME". It is a vintage counterfeit die strike on a genuine US Mint silver Seated Liberty Dime. I don't think I have seen any other situations where vintage counterfeit dies are struck on a genuine US coin. This specimen appears to have a little bit of gilding still there, around the periphery. So it is likely that this piece was intended to be spent at the "up-rated" $2.50 face value, and it is possible that it circulated alongside genuine money for a time.

    I do not know the history or pedigree of this specimen, except that it was purchased from a seller located in France, and shipped to me from there.

    This picture is a close-up of what I can make out of the original date. Note that the original design elements are flattened and spread out significantly. My conclusion is that the host coin was dated "1849". I do not see any trace of a mint mark, so I believe it was a Philadelphia coin.

  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 10,016 ✭✭✭✭✭

    New Orleans dimes of this era have the mint mark ABOVE the wreath (below the word "DIME").
    I see no evidence of an "O" at that location. So I believe this is an 1849 Philadelphia host coin.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file