Well, this is interesting. And different.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/976f6/976f6a874a03e9bbeaf364748e51afbfaf11eeec" alt="dcarr"
I recently acquired this oddball. I have come to my own conclusion about it. I will let other folks make their comments before I reveal mine. About 18mm diameter. 2.5 grams.
10
I recently acquired this oddball. I have come to my own conclusion about it. I will let other folks make their comments before I reveal mine. About 18mm diameter. 2.5 grams.
Comments
Dime struck with counterfeit quarter eagle dies.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Very unusual. Contemporary counterfeit quarter eagle, overstruck on a genuine dime, once gilt.
I can't make out the original date on the dime but it might be figure-out-able in hand.
I wonder if it was successfully passed into circulation?
I await the input of @dcarr.... That one is a strange one indeed. Cheers, RickO
Oh My!
Racketeer Dime
Gilded to deceive and looks like it worked.
bobdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03d01/03d014466c79a61b908410897adb8a3479910508" alt=":) :)"
Cool!
I cannot even venture a guess.
Let us know what the verdict is.
Wayne
Kennedys are my quest...
At first I could only see the E's of the under type as small C's.. was thinking a CWT or something as the undertype..
That's a super cool counterfeit all day long!
🤯
Definitely a contemporary counterfeit, from hand-cut dies. I have an 1853 three cent piece with very similar looking 5 in the date. No idea why it was struck over a contemporary dime, maybe to test the dies before wasting a plated gold planchet?
That is honestly kind of awesome, I would love to know the story behind it.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
Any way to determine if there's any gold rinse still on the surfaces? Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW
Wow! That is super cool. I love the recut "8" in the date, and the stylization of the "5".
Recut "8"! Doesn't that make it an "ERROR" and worth a fortune?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0228a/0228a503c440c4ee8c250c854ecdc96f290f4839" alt=";) ;)"
Seriously, a very interesting and unusual item.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03d01/03d014466c79a61b908410897adb8a3479910508" alt=":) :)"
The 1851 $2 1/2 gilded brass is one of the most commonly encountered contemporary struck counterfeits. It's often listed as a game counter in error as neither Kurth nor Fuld & Rulau included the 1851 in their works on game counters. That die pair has traveled around.
Interesting piece. I noticed the OP mentioned the weight and diameter but nothing else...
@PerryHall and @jonathanb pegged it right off. Not too difficult if you realize that the apparent "CO" on the cheek is actually part of an upside-down "DIME". It is a vintage counterfeit die strike on a genuine US Mint silver Seated Liberty Dime. I don't think I have seen any other situations where vintage counterfeit dies are struck on a genuine US coin. This specimen appears to have a little bit of gilding still there, around the periphery. So it is likely that this piece was intended to be spent at the "up-rated" $2.50 face value, and it is possible that it circulated alongside genuine money for a time.
I do not know the history or pedigree of this specimen, except that it was purchased from a seller located in France, and shipped to me from there.
This picture is a close-up of what I can make out of the original date. Note that the original design elements are flattened and spread out significantly. My conclusion is that the host coin was dated "1849". I do not see any trace of a mint mark, so I believe it was a Philadelphia coin.
New Orleans dimes of this era have the mint mark ABOVE the wreath (below the word "DIME").
I see no evidence of an "O" at that location. So I believe this is an 1849 Philadelphia host coin.