Grade opinion please.....1915 5c.
DoubleEagle59
Posts: 8,377 ✭✭✭✭✭
Any comments would be appreciated........................
"Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
0
Comments
MS62 IMO.
Hard to tell about the luster, etc. Would be better to have some different angles.
I see rub on the hip, probably the tail and horn also - though hard to tell in those flat photos. Also looks like a rub on the cheek and brow of the obverse as well as the braids.
I'm going with some flavor of AU
AU58.
55 to 58
BHNC #203
au55
AU55
AU'ish and lightly wiped.
AU for sure....definitely not UNC
I am in the AU group.
Just a really nice AU coin
Silverman68, jfoot13, GAB, ricman, Smittys, scrapman1077, RyGuy, Connecticoin, Meltdown, VikingDude, Peaceman, Patches and more.
Looks AU55 at best.
AU to me
BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out
AU58, I believe the rub on the hipbone, thigh and tail along with horn to be prevalent, but not yet distracting.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Choice AU
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Solid AU 58. Nice coin!
I guess I'm the only one here who thinks this is a Mint state coin.
AU, looks lightly cleaned to me.
55
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
My first thought was nice AU58. I wouldn't be surprised to see it in a 63 holder. It is a nice looking buff.
AU58 or MS60.
While Ron is far more educated on the Buffalo Nickel than I am, I may say that many coins in the early years of the 1900's were stored in coin cabinets for long periods of time and usually face up. There exists a wear attributed to shelf wear while stored in trays, drawers or shelves of which many were velvet lined and there was a very small amount of wear associated with this storage method. The fact that this 1915 Buffalo Nickel shows only high points wear on the reverse might very well be this type of wear allowing the coin to still be uncirculated. If wear was to be consistent with circulation there should be equal or close wear on the obverse as well and, at least to me, it does not, which may account for an uncirculated designation. 1915 year date Buffaloes came very well struck and wear is usually easily noticed.
Again, this is just my opinion.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
I see what appears to be very light wear on the obverse, too - note Indian’s brow, cheek and portions of hair. The coin looks AU58 to me.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I have seen coins with more wear than this one slabbed as Mint state pieces. But maybe my old, tired eyes are failing me.
Even if you have, you seem to be describing pieces that weren't really mint state. And therefore, shouldn't have been graded as such.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Another pin added to your voodoo doll. I also think it's AU!
Looks like a nice AU58 coin to me.....Some very light wear visible on both sides. Cheers, RickO
I like it at 55.
slider 58.
That happens fairly frequently.
Looks like AU58 to me.
Au55
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
I don't doubt it. But as for myself, it wouldn't cause me to grade a coin unc. if I felt it were AU.
I'm not saying the coin couldn't grade unc., but rather, to me, it looks AU58. And as you know, in many cases, there's not necessarily much difference between a 58 and a 62.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
So true. And I most certainly disagree with any coin with wear graded as Mint state anything. But it is what it is.
MINT-AN OBJECT IN PRISTINE CONDITION, AS IN NEW
STATE- the particular condition that something is in at a specific time.