Options
How would you grade this Dollar? Worthy of a SNAD?
amwldcoin
Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭
It came out of one of those off brand holders graded MS65!
0
Comments
I'm thinking more like 63.
My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
U.S. Army Veteran 1/11 ACR Fulda, Germany
To me, MS63. I don't like the scrape on the cheek and the fingerprint on the reverse. I'm sure many will call it a 64.
I would grade it a shame. Such a nice strike to be so scarred up. MS62
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
63+
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
64 seems about right ... fields pretty clean despite the cheek scrapes
63
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
62
64 CoNGaRTS!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
Retiring at 55, what day is today?
63.
"It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."
63 tops.
63
Mr_Spud
63 seems more respectable, but I think the cheek, brow and obverse field holds it back from anything more
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
63
63
Unattractive whatever the numerical grade is.
MS-63 at best. The scrape on the cheek precludes anything higher.
AU58
Is it just me or does something seem amiss with this Morgan? Here is one of my 04-O's for comparision with the OP's:
63 max
I like it as a 63 too.
MS 63+ to MS 64.
Lance.
The shape of the numerals and the spacing of the date does seem a bit off.
62
My guess would be 63, though I feel that is generous - that may be due to the pictures. Cheers, RickO
Here is the listing. The pictures are spot on!
https://ebay.com/itm/1904-O-Morgan-Dollar-Lighty-Toned-Unc-/293899898388?hash=item446dcc8e14%3Ag%3A0ioAAOSwstxVB37D&nma=true&si=vQmlOOF0RI7DcRXA2a%252Bob9Pnwzw%253D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557
The toning doesn't do anything for me but it looks around 63. Based on the listing you linked, I can't imagine what the basis for a SNAD would be. That said, eBay buyers are far more creative than I am in that department.
I’m confused why the listing would be worthy of a not as described claim filed?
63
Check the VAM listing for date position. Well struck for sure for an '04-O.
Ugly 63
You are the seller? The buyer can just say "I did not like it" and send it back. How can it be not as described? It's called "buyer regrets". The buyer was looking for something that isn't there, knowing that he could return it if it did meet whatever he was looking for. This happened to me more than once. There are plenty of unreasonable people out there using ebay looking for easy profit stuff. Best to just give a refund, ban the bidder, and forget it.
I called ebay right after. It urks me that ebay automatically does this. The buyer tried the feedback extortion route trying to get me to give a partial refund. Sounds like ebay is going to cover the shipping and maybe the Paypal fees if I call them after I get it back. Buyer is claiming it's AU and then said it's a 60 at best!