Looking for opinions on this 1861 Three Cent Silver.....

I suppose it's a fine 3 center, but something about it just bothers me.
The odd wear on the obverse for example. It makes it look wrinkled and bent, but it's not.
0
I suppose it's a fine 3 center, but something about it just bothers me.
The odd wear on the obverse for example. It makes it look wrinkled and bent, but it's not.
Comments
It has some damage on the obverse.
I think might be a contemporary counterfeit, and a nice one at that.
You know, it just may be.
Look at the 'RICA'of America. Not aligned or evenly spaced.
I found it packed away. Something I would have picked up 40 years ago.......
It's amazing to think that 3 cents had enough value in 1861 to fake one !
They were worth more than a nickel was when Henning counterfeited them and I suspect the Nickels would cost more to make!
Will the counterfeits have any silver in it?
Looks fake.
Contemporary counterfeit, I posted one on the BST about six months ago, yours looks like it might have the same reverse. In that condition it is probably worth more as a fake than a real one.
Edit to add pics of my coin, looks very similar but not the same dies.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
I agree, as a collector of contemporary counterfeits it has a lot more interest and history than the authentic 3¢ piece.
Man, I'm glad I opened the thread. First thing I thought was, yeah, it does look off ... ??? contemporary counterfeit ???
Nice to see I might not be wrong
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
VERY fake. Terrible in fact...imho.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
Yup contemporary counterfeit. Cool.
Thanks folks....
Maybe I'll stick it on the BST......
A fake for sure.... those letters (RICA) are way off.....Cheers, RickO
I think you are exactly right, there are places where the lines of the star extend well beyond the typical design that are the same on your coin and mine. When I found my coin, I did some research and found another example with the large die crack posted here. I would love to know how many the counterfeiter was able to make before his dies failed.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
Date is very uneven between the 18 and the 61. First thing that jumped out to me. The other specimen posted has a much more "presentable" looking 1-8-6-1 date.
Counterfeit. As others said, the date, among other design devices, are wrong.
The counterfeits - at least the hand-cut dies - NEVER get the angles of the outlines quite right.
Nice!
ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")