MS-64 because of the scratch running down from the eye.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
@SeattleSlammer said:
Giant scratch? huh?....my eyes must be going
Ya I'm not seeing it either. Looks like a break in the toning tis all but then again I haven't seen the eye doctor since 1994.
I grade it 65+ and love it!!
@SeattleSlammer said:
Giant scratch? huh?....my eyes must be going
Check in front at the bottom of Isabella's eye and down her cheek. It might be just a toning mark, but it looks like a scratch in the photo.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
I first saw an Isabella Quarter about 36 years ago while in my local coin shop. I was buddies with the owner and another customer had just bought one and had brought it in for show and tell. It was a blast white beauty but this coin blows that coin away. I had never heard of an Isabella Quarter before that day as I wasn't into Classic Commemoratives.
You have to remember this was before the internet and my access to info was limited.
Since then I have always wanted to get one but never have.
If this coin was ever available I would LOVE to buy it.
P.S. I blew the photo up and I can't see a scratch,,,,,, giant or otherwise.
My first reaction is that's at least a 65, and it's a gorgeous coin.
That was before I found the scratch.
My sense is the coin graded 65 and the graders weren't any harder on the coin because of the scratch, but a silent net grade to 64 or even a bodybag wouldn't surprise me either.
I guess 65.
Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
The scratch on the body is certainly there, but covered by the tarnish. The other scratch seems barely visible.... I would go with the 65/66 guesses....and lean to 66 because of the excellent detail. Cheers, RickO
Ouch. PCGS is mighty tough on toned coins right now (thankfully after some of the stuff straight graded over the last 12 months). Your coin seems to have natural toning and colors in my opinion, but maybe having the coin in hand would tell a different story.
@ShadyDave said:
Ouch. PCGS is mighty tough on toned coins right now (thankfully after some of the stuff straight graded over the last 12 months). Your coin seems to have natural toning and colors in my opinion, but maybe having the coin in hand would tell a different story.
Maybe PCGS is a bit gun shy due to all of the colorful ASE's getting around. I still like that quarter, too bad the value took a big hit. Can't blame our host for being cautious.
That's a shame! I wonder what they were basing their rejection on? I bought a Morgan dollar that PCGS rejected like that and another grading service called MS64 and it sold right away due to eye appeal.
I thought it would "QC" from the first second I saw it, although honestly I admit I like the coin, QC or not.
However what was the kicker for me is that this color on an Isabella is most unusual and out of the ordinary, so I presumed that the graders would err on the side of caution.
If/when they see something they either haven't seen or very rarely see, it will not receive a straight grade a majority of the time.
@Wabbit2313 said:
The toning on the rims is the giveaway for me.
I must admit, that feature in particular was a concern when I viewed the coin, but I'm not sure it would have caused me to reject the coin -- but in retrospect I see what you mean.
Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
If it is QC, it's one that strikes me as being very close to acceptable. The toning on the rims is a little worrisome, but plenty of perfectly acceptable coins have at least some of this. Submit it a few times and it will come back OK eventually. If the coin is otherwise going to get a high grade, they'll maybe err on the side of caution.
@BryceM said:
If it is QC, it's one that strikes me as being very close to acceptable. The toning on the rims is a little worrisome, but plenty of perfectly acceptable coins have at least some of this. Submit it a few times and it will come back OK eventually. If the coin is otherwise going to get a high grade, they'll maybe err on the side of caution.
If I had submitted six to eight months before I eventually did, I think it would have made it first try. I too think it will eventually end up in straight graded plastic if I try enough but it isn't worth many attempts because it is an inexpensive piece. I'm waiting until I see signs that PCGS is loosening again before I resubmit it.
Comments
64, if it's not detail graded due to the giant scratch.
66
MS-64 because of the scratch running down from the eye.
65
MS66
Successful Trades: Swampboy,
Giant scratch? huh?....my eyes must be going
High end gem imo. Many of these have either been dipped out and come back as cleaned or are darkly toned. This one has a lot of eye appeal.
Ya I'm not seeing it either. Looks like a break in the toning tis all but then again I haven't seen the eye doctor since 1994.
I grade it 65+ and love it!!
Check in front at the bottom of Isabella's eye and down her cheek. It might be just a toning mark, but it looks like a scratch in the photo.
65+
66
Best place to buy !
Bronze Associate member
66.25
Don't quote me on that.
Looks very pretty but it's hard to grade from a truevue beauty shot.
Unusual toning for an Isabella, maybe formerly in a PCI or old NGC holder?
Commems and Early Type
Gorgeous coin regardless of them grade! 65+
Huh. I thought this was "the giant scratch" referred to.
Pretty.
Lance.
I do not see the scratch either. I have an appointment with the eye doctor on Wednesday.
I see the scratch Lance noted, but none on the cheek that would even be visible with my eyes. The one on her body is pretty tough.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
64 because of the scratch, no worse because of where it's located. An awesome looker regardless.
Giant scratch? huh?....my eyes must be going > @lkeigwin said:
Now I see that...now that you’ve blown it up even bigger. Kind of looked like it meshed with the clothing drapery design a bit...
I don't care much for Isabella quarters, but wow, this one is beautiful!
66?
Dave
MS65. Beautiful coin.
If you have to blow it up to flying saucer size to see the "giant scratch" under the eye.....Well, I say it can be ignored.
I'm going with the predominant 66 as well.
Regardless of the scratch the eye appeal is super.
So I give the scratch a 66.:)
Thank you for the comments and guesses! I'll post the grade tomorrow.
UNC details
That’s a very pretty quarter regardless of what the plastic says
That tiny scratch is not distracting. With eye appeal... 65 or 66.
Bed time bump...
Really nice looking coin. I love the toning pattern and it's one I'd be happy to own. I'd guess MS66.
MS65+
Hoard the keys.
I first saw an Isabella Quarter about 36 years ago while in my local coin shop. I was buddies with the owner and another customer had just bought one and had brought it in for show and tell. It was a blast white beauty but this coin blows that coin away. I had never heard of an Isabella Quarter before that day as I wasn't into Classic Commemoratives.
You have to remember this was before the internet and my access to info was limited.
Since then I have always wanted to get one but never have.
If this coin was ever available I would LOVE to buy it.


P.S. I blew the photo up and I can't see a scratch,,,,,, giant or otherwise.
65
I'ts past midnight, what's the grade?
No Way Out: Stimulus and Money Printing Are the Only Path Left
My first reaction is that's at least a 65, and it's a gorgeous coin.
That was before I found the scratch.
My sense is the coin graded 65 and the graders weren't any harder on the coin because of the scratch, but a silent net grade to 64 or even a bodybag wouldn't surprise me either.
I guess 65.
QC
The scratch on the body is certainly there, but covered by the tarnish. The other scratch seems barely visible.... I would go with the 65/66 guesses....and lean to 66 because of the excellent detail. Cheers, RickO
This was submitted raw to PCGS, and has not been resubmitted although I hope to try again in the future.
PCGS called this UNC Details - Questionable Color
Ouch. PCGS is mighty tough on toned coins right now (thankfully after some of the stuff straight graded over the last 12 months). Your coin seems to have natural toning and colors in my opinion, but maybe having the coin in hand would tell a different story.
Thanks! I welcome the tightening too.
Maybe PCGS is a bit gun shy due to all of the colorful ASE's getting around. I still like that quarter, too bad the value took a big hit. Can't blame our host for being cautious.
Maybe the toning was just too even, it sure is pretty.
edit to add: Maybe it failed the sniffer.
That's a shame! I wonder what they were basing their rejection on? I bought a Morgan dollar that PCGS rejected like that and another grading service called MS64 and it sold right away due to eye appeal.
The toning on the rims is the giveaway for me.
I still want it, how long till I see it in B/S/T?
I thought it would "QC" from the first second I saw it, although honestly I admit I like the coin, QC or not.
However what was the kicker for me is that this color on an Isabella is most unusual and out of the ordinary, so I presumed that the graders would err on the side of caution.
If/when they see something they either haven't seen or very rarely see, it will not receive a straight grade a majority of the time.
In a QC holder... never.
Take a look through coin facts and all the true views for this coin from 64 on up. The color of yours fits right in.
I must admit, that feature in particular was a concern when I viewed the coin, but I'm not sure it would have caused me to reject the coin -- but in retrospect I see what you mean.
If it is QC, it's one that strikes me as being very close to acceptable. The toning on the rims is a little worrisome, but plenty of perfectly acceptable coins have at least some of this. Submit it a few times and it will come back OK eventually. If the coin is otherwise going to get a high grade, they'll maybe err on the side of caution.
If I had submitted six to eight months before I eventually did, I think it would have made it first try. I too think it will eventually end up in straight graded plastic if I try enough but it isn't worth many attempts because it is an inexpensive piece. I'm waiting until I see signs that PCGS is loosening again before I resubmit it.