1916-D mercury dime, gtg: your grade & pcgs grade
HappyHunting
Posts: 31 ✭✭
7
HappyHunting
Posts: 31 ✭✭
Comments
Looks like a very nice one with original skin. I don't know what to think about the very mushy bands on the reverse. I'm about MS 64.
My grade AU-58+. PCGS grade MS-62
Mine: 66.
PCGS: 66
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
Great looking coin.
My grade ms64
Pcgs au58+
64+ PCGS 62.
Me 64, PCGS 63.
Kind regards,
George
Nice coin. 58
Me 58
P 63
MS63 x 2
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
/\
I'll go with 58 as these come nicely struck and I'm seeing a weak center band and rub directly under that. Would like to have this one in my collection
I would like to know what Martin is disagreeing about????
Hard to grade from this pic.....58-63.
62
Latin American Collection
Thanks dimeman. Did not know I did that. Fat fingers on a small phone
Thanks
Martin
MS- 63 looking coin.
I LOVE old coins.
Graders stare at key dates for a bit longer. I’m in at around MS62/3.
My thinking is an AU58+
I believe that most mercury dimes struck in 1916 had great strikes.
my grade 63
pcgs 58
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
Details? The damage to the obverse - rim @ 11:00, forehead, round hit at eyebrow/temple, smaller round hit on leading edge of wing.
Reverse - Middle bands are flat - damage?? Or wear? Or less than good strike?
What does the luster in the fields look like in hand? Around the devices?
Sorry, I am stuck at a details holder for the unfortunate items on the obverse.
I think the AU 58 - MS 62 crowd has it. No FB. Decent coin overall.
I'm thinking MS63 No SB, but an AU58 from PCGS wouldn't shock me either and I could go along with that from what I can see.
Pete
Louis Armstrong
I agree with Bill Jones. My Grade 58+ PCGS 62 No FB
I believe it to be a most attractive 58+ and I feel pcgs will grade 58+ also.
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
My feelings also.
65 no fsb.
Maybe 66 depending on how the mark above the eye looks in hand
Why does anyone have FSB in their guess?
FSB does not apply to this coin in any way!
I’m gonna say 58 from both me and PCGS.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I'm at an AU-58 on this. I think PCGS might also be as well. The thing that is throwing me a bit and making me want to say AU-55 is the apparent lack of luster in the images. But I'm going to assume it's just the images and that the luster is there, although with rub on both the obverse and reverse, mostly obverse, making it AU-58.
au55
Ms-63
62/58.... Cheers, RickO
So whats the grade?
I am semi-surprised
The luster shows better on that photo.
Congrats on a monster date in choice condition.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
That’s is a very nice piece. I would have guessed 64 and I’m not quite sure why it’s not. Congratulations
Way nicer looking than 63. Good eye you got there.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.