guess the date on this low ball dime - any chance it'll grade p01?
KollectorKing
Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭


oops -
0
KollectorKing
Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭✭✭


oops -
Comments
It would take more knowledge than I have to put a date on that one.
No expert here but I do not think that will straight grade PO1, JMHO
Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko
Bad transactions with : nobody to date
1989?
That is one NASTY Dime!
Too much meat for me to say PO01...sorry.
Later, Paul.
Uh oh........
I'm thinking fair 02. I don't think it would dip to even PO01+.
Hard to say.... try a mild acid dip.....
Since the date is not legible, I am doubting it will straight grade. Cheers, RickO
fair-02 all the way
but worth a try to get the lofty grade of basal state (aka poor) 01
a.k.a "The BUFFINATOR"
Fair 02. Far too much detail "merit" a Poor 01.
Throw it back in the dryer for a week or so.
eBay ID-bruceshort978
Successful BST:here and ATS, bumanchu, wdrob, hashtag, KeeNoooo, mikej61, Yonico, Meltdown, BAJJERFAN, Excaliber, lordmarcovan, cucamongacoin, robkool, bradyc, tonedcointrader, mumu, Windycity, astrotrain, tizofthe, overdate, rwyarmch, mkman123, Timbuk3,GBurger717, airplanenut, coinkid855 ,illini420, michaeldixon, Weiss, Morpheus, Deepcoin, Collectorcoins, AUandAG, D.Schwager.
Too many readable features.
FR02...
Peripheral lettering is easily readable. That kicks it up FR02/AG03.
Somehow this coin does not look like it has "honest wear" to me. The centers are much too sharp given the weakness around the rim. Perhaps this is some sort of a "manufactured" low grade piece.
Or has some has suggested about this & the other one: both may have gone through washers/dryers countless times.
The coin came from a coinstar reject bin. oops

null
Remember the 2004, eh? PCGS AG03