Home U.S. Coin Forum

Video Added - Can This CAC? Just thinking...

NumivenNumiven Posts: 382 ✭✭✭
edited August 25, 2017 5:54PM in U.S. Coin Forum

After much thought and consultation with many amazingly helping forum members, I purchased this beauty for exactly $3k
This is for my gold detailed type set. This fill my type 1 Liberty DE.

I also clicked professional images in my own photolab.

Would love to hear how I did from folks here (both coin and photography) :smile:

A sincere thanks for all the forum members who helped me through PMs. You guys rock! Appreciate every bit of knowledge you provided.

I started putting together all types of gold coins going backward from 1933 to 1796. As of now I have all types until 1856 (execpt saint HR). Need classics and early gold and they are expensive!

Comments

  • slider23slider23 Posts: 660 ✭✭✭✭

    The mark on the lip is distracting. My guess is that it would not sticker. Nice photo.

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,233 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If the photo is representative, then I'd say no

  • CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No. Its REAL lucky it has the grade assigned.

  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CommemKing said:
    No. Its REAL lucky it has the grade assigned.

    I agree.

  • jtlee321jtlee321 Posts: 2,365 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Please don't take this the wrong way, I'm just trying to give constructive criticism here. The cut across her lip is pretty distracting and the wear is pretty strong, you can see haloing around the date and devices indicating stronger luster there and less so in the open fields. I'd say it's lucky to be in the 58 holder, it looks more like a 53 to me.

    Your images are pretty good. I'm curious as to what your setup is. When I clicked on the image to make it larger, I noticed they were a bit on the soft side. Hence my question about your setup.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,710 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would not buy it as an AU58.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • stevereecystevereecy Posts: 205 ✭✭✭
    edited June 28, 2017 8:03PM

    Looks like a smoking deal in any AU holder.

    Really enjoying collecting coins and currency again

    My currency "Box of Ten" Thread: https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1045579/my-likely-slow-to-develop-box-of-ten#latest
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My guess, and it is just a guess at this point, is that the coin would fail CAC due to either the cut across the lip and/or what appears to be odd luster.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • This content has been removed.
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,233 ✭✭✭✭✭

    _ what appears to be odd luster_

    That was my concern - more so than the marks. The coin just appears to be too 'smooth' on the luster. I suspected a silent net grade

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,395 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think OP for $3000 got a decent deal. I've attached photos for two
    recent auction transactions. CAC one sold for $3700, and the other one for $3500. OP's coin appears to be consistent for an NGC58 based on pictures. I also suspect his photos are not presenting the coin accurately.


  • Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am wondering if the luster issue is the image. I go 50/50 on the CAC sticker. I have seen worse 58's.

  • NumivenNumiven Posts: 382 ✭✭✭
    edited June 28, 2017 9:34PM

    The cut on the lip is amplified on my pic:
    1. Because I wanted it amplified to show it well, so I positioned the lights that way
    2. Because the coin image is also zoomed in from the actual size for the pic (unlike in hand)

    Luster:
    1. My lighting angle does not bring out the luster as much as you can see in hand. I am loading a mini video that will show the luster pattern. I believe that will help.

  • NumivenNumiven Posts: 382 ✭✭✭
    edited June 28, 2017 9:57PM

    @skier07 said:
    I think OP for $3000 got a decent deal. I've attached photos for two
    recent auction transactions. CAC one sold for $3700, and the other one for $3500. OP's coin appears to be consistent for an NGC58 based on pictures. I also suspect his photos are not presenting the coin accurately.

    This is the same research I did before purchasing. I feel (just my opinion) this coin has little lesser dings (at least in reverse) than other AU58s NGC (cac or not). I used NGC auction history and pretty much looked at every single pic that was there.

    Are there nicer AU58s, absolutely.

  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,863 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm not sure what the gloves are for. The coin is in a slab after all.

    From the first photos, I'd say no CAC. From the video, I'd say maybe. There's an easy way to find out. :)

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,233 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I wish the video showed the coin being rolled very slowly....and then tilted back and forth very quickly. It needs to be about three times as long to get a good look at it. But yes, the luster appears much fresher in the video

  • 10000lakes10000lakes Posts: 811 ✭✭✭✭
    edited June 28, 2017 10:12PM

    I think the look of the OP coin is caused by seawater/sand abrasion.
    Probably was in a SS Central America PCGS holder and crossed over to NGC minus the pedigree.

  • NumivenNumiven Posts: 382 ✭✭✭
    edited June 28, 2017 10:11PM

    Respect and appreciate every single comment.

    BTW, the two lighter vertical scratches circled are on the old NGC holder. Thanks.

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,417 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @10000lakes said:
    I think the look of the OP coin is caused by seawater/sand abrasion.
    Probably was in a SS Central America PCGS holder and crossed over to NGC minus the pedigree.

    That was my view as well.

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,233 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Fwiw - the reverse looks fully unc in that video

  • NumivenNumiven Posts: 382 ✭✭✭
    edited June 28, 2017 10:18PM

    @tradedollarnut said:
    Fwiw - the reverse looks fully unc in that video

    Yes. The reverse attracted me towards this coin and make me overlook the cut on the lips (at this grade and price).

  • 10000lakes10000lakes Posts: 811 ✭✭✭✭

    Many of the AU gold foil label PCGS SS Central America coins ended up in MS 61/62 PCGS/NGC holders minus the pedigree.
    And many of them CAC with that "look".

  • NumivenNumiven Posts: 382 ✭✭✭
    edited June 28, 2017 10:33PM

    Yes, I thought about this before buying, but the coloration on the reverse (3-5 o clock, above D.) makes me double guess it.

    From the looks, it looks like this is a NGC 7 holder (used from 1997 to 2000). Did people do crossovers at that time?

    I believe the SS Central America hoard was discovered and sold (after lawsuit) in 1996.

    If its the case, is there a way I can get the pedigree back? The SS Central America Pedigree has a nice premium.

    Ref:
    https://www.ngccoin.com/boards/topic/117773-ngc-slab-varieties/

  • 10000lakes10000lakes Posts: 811 ✭✭✭✭
    edited June 28, 2017 10:39PM

    The premium really only applies to the original pedigree holder coins.
    Kind of like PCGS holders with GSA on them don't get the premium like the original GSA holder coins.

    The earliest auction records I could find were some raw coins sold in 2000 and the PCGS holder coins sold in 2001.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like gold coins.. and your video portrays the coin better then the still shots. From the video, I would say the grade is ok - the lib scratch is quite distracting though. The edge reed hits on the reverse are fairly minor... I do not think it would get a sticker at CAC though. Cheers, RickO

  • JJSingletonJJSingleton Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As you know I do not believe this will CAC. But the only way to find out is to send it in.

    Joseph J. Singleton - First Superintendent of the U.S. Branch Mint in Dahlonega Georgia

    Findley Ridge Collection
    About Findley Ridge

  • Peace_dollar88Peace_dollar88 Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think it is a good looking coin. Only one way to find out if it will CAC or not!

  • Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    After the video, I still stay with 50/50 because those are the odds I get over there!

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,784 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Indeed it looks better in the video. Nice coin! I hope it stickers.

  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,096 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Numiven said:
    Yes, I thought about this before buying, but the coloration on the reverse (3-5 o clock, above D.) makes me double guess it.

    From the looks, it looks like this is a NGC 7 holder (used from 1997 to 2000). Did people do crossovers at that time?

    I believe the SS Central America hoard was discovered and sold (after lawsuit) in 1996.

    If its the case, is there a way I can get the pedigree back? The SS Central America Pedigree has a nice premium.

    Ref:
    https://www.ngccoin.com/boards/topic/117773-ngc-slab-varieties/

    I don't know about NGC, but the PCGS crossover service started in 1995-1996 and PCGS would offer coupons for five free crossover attempts per submission. I crossed a number of coins to PCGS at that time.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file