Which side of the fence? #2

Comments

• ChangeInHistory Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 1, 2017 6:23PM

  AU

  The hair above the ear and eagle's breast tell me AU, and it's not an O mint.

  1
• tradedollarnut Posts: 20,302 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 1, 2017 6:31PM

  AU

  Early Dollar Set

  0
• AUandAG Posts: 24,993 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 1, 2017 7:10PM

  UNC

  MS62

  bob

  Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  

  0
• BustHalfBrian Posts: 4,192 ✭✭✭✭

  January 1, 2017 9:17PM

  UNC

  I think it is MS61, shot 62. There's no doubt it's much nicer than the 01-P I submitted last year, which graded AU58.

  Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.

  0
• coinhack Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭✭

  January 1, 2017 10:12PM

  AU

  I see several little things that look AU that I guess the majority also see.

  0
• TommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 1, 2017 10:31PM

  AU

  A nice AU....but I have little doubt it is AU.

  Easily distracted Type Collector

  0
• Coin Finder Posts: 7,544 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 1, 2017 10:51PM

  What happened with round 1? what were the results?

  0
• Bochiman Posts: 25,628 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 1, 2017 11:59PM

  AU

  From the pics, my first inclination is AU. A lustrous AU, but still AU.

  I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  2
• alohagary Posts: 2,834 ✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 12:31AM

  Too much disturbance in the fields otherwise unc

  1
• coinkat Posts: 23,998 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 2:46AM

  AU

  No cigar... The 1901 Morgan had consistency issues in terms of strike and quality. While this is high end AU, it misses the mark.

  Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  0
• grip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 4:44AM

  AU

  AU.

  0
• ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 6:51AM

  AU

  Clearly AU..... Cheers, RickO

  0
• TwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,710 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 8:49AM

  UNC

  Unc unless I submit it. In that case, "genuine"

  ``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5

  0
• mirabela Posts: 5,135 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 9:06AM

  AU

  58 and nice for the grade.

  mirabela

  0
• asheland Posts: 24,076 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 9:49AM

  AU

  The hairlines in the fields lead me to believe AU

  My YouTube Channel

  0
• Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 10:41AM

  AU

  AU

  
  
  Hoard the keys.

  0
• david3142 Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 10:54AM

  AU

  Looks AU to me before considering that it's a 1901. Hairlines in the fields, softness on hair and eagle. Also, you're never going to get the benefit of the doubt on a 1901 (or 84-S or 92-S, etc).

  0
• BillJones Posts: 35,082 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 11:36AM

  AU

  The appears to have a dull spot, indicative of a rub, on Ms. Liberty's cheek.

  Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?

  0
• Nic Posts: 3,429 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 11:40AM

  55

  My 1866 Philly Mint Set

  0
• messydesk Posts: 20,488 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 11:41AM

  AU

  AU, but a damn nice AU. The color change is barely perceptible near the tip of Liberty's bust, and there seems to be very light wear elsewhere, too. TPGs will look long and hard before assigning a MS grade to a 1901,

  John
  Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution

  0
• CascadeChris Posts: 2,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

  January 2, 2017 12:30PM

  AU

  Going off of pics I see slight discoloration from rub and tpg's won't give an 01p an unc grade unless they're darn sure of it. Nice coin though

  The more you VAM..

  0