Great strike. It might just be my monitor, but the color in the obverse devices looks green to me. I usually stay away from anything green on coins. The reverse looks amazing.
Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;
Hard to tell, I haven't seen that look with silver coins much. A dealer showed me an Unc. Mass. Colonial cent today that looked to me a no problem Unc., but I am no expert on those. It had some minor dark spots. These folks need to get their valuable coins in plastic with a sharp conservation expert possibly first to examine, but I doubt this one needs it.
It has a sharpness grade of AU, but the color, especially on the reverse does not look natural. As the others have said, sometimes coins are raw for a reason.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
@grip said:
At first I thought it was an impaired proof.
That is why I bought it. It has the die chip below the hand and the reverse indicators of the branch mint proof. I can't make out the lines in the shield but will be able to investigate when I have it in hand Tuesday. Fun stuff
Nice strike, however, as those preceding have said, it appears to be either added color or the remains of a dip poorly neutralized.....needs conservation. Cheers, RickO
Comments
I love it too. Strong strike there. Very deep details.
Do you think our host would assign this a numerical grade or details?
Great strike. It might just be my monitor, but the color in the obverse devices looks green to me. I usually stay away from anything green on coins. The reverse looks amazing.
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
Hard to tell, I haven't seen that look with silver coins much. A dealer showed me an Unc. Mass. Colonial cent today that looked to me a no problem Unc., but I am no expert on those. It had some minor dark spots. These folks need to get their valuable coins in plastic with a sharp conservation expert possibly first to examine, but I doubt this one needs it.
AT.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Not a fan
Latin American Collection
Nice strike but odd color. There is probably a reason why a coin like that is still raw more than 30 years into the slab era.
It has a sharpness grade of AU, but the color, especially on the reverse does not look natural. As the others have said, sometimes coins are raw for a reason.
At first I thought it was an impaired proof.
That is why I bought it. It has the die chip below the hand and the reverse indicators of the branch mint proof. I can't make out the lines in the shield but will be able to investigate when I have it in hand Tuesday. Fun stuff
Nice strike, however, as those preceding have said, it appears to be either added color or the remains of a dip poorly neutralized.....needs conservation. Cheers, RickO
Thanks for the opinions fellas, I'll update good or bad when in hand.
I picked up this one today, a seasoned PNG dealer said the coin had AU details with a little smudge on right that should come off with acetone:

My coin just graded AU50 at PCGS, thanks for their efficient service.
I personally like the coin, but not the toning. Is the toning artificial?
Fan of the Oxford Comma
CCAC Representative of the General Public
2021 Young Numismatist of the Year
not for me. i dont care for the reverse that much. its still a nice coin but no thanks
Plus the op's coin is too blotchy.
The first coin looks nice except for the reverse color. It looks like kinda fake toning....Just my opinion...