#1
#2
Look to keep just one but can't decide.
To me the first one is more eye appealing.
For me, easily #1, especially because of the reverse. I know that "tab toning" is quite popular, but it's just not attractive.
Both nice and although the second has typical tab holder toning for the issue the first captures the eye.
The obverse/reverse strike is also better on the first, however that could just be a photography rotation lighting issue.
I like #1 better....just better eye appeal.
K
Why is my reply so big? Testing, testing.
I like #1 better.
The one you like better is the better coin for your collection
Coin #1 by far
For me, the top one all day long.
Ditto for #1.
the one where you can be truthful when you say rainbow, =#1
For me...#1
Number 1.... less tarnish.... Cheers, RickO
the 1st one looks better to me. not so much tarnish on it.
2
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
coinkat meant 1
1 man, 1
Only one 2 ?..phillips will help you get back to 1. J/K
"Better" is relative in this case.
Number one blows the other one away. This is a no contest.
Edited to add that the toning on number two is a minus not a plus.
I like them both, but prefer coin #1.
Number 1 is best
In with the crowd. #1
Another vote for #1. It just looks better.
Number 1 without a doubt
Latin American Collection
Ditto - #1.
Yup. #1
At first I didn't like #1 due to the toning splotches on the head. Then I saw #2 so now I prefer #1 hands down.
@rainbowroosie said: Number one blows the other one away. This is a no contest. Edited to add that the toning on number two is a minus not a plus.
@rainbowroosie said: Number one blows the other one away. This is a no contest.
This
Comments
To me the first one is more eye appealing.
For me, easily #1, especially because of the reverse. I know that "tab toning" is quite popular, but it's just not attractive.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Both nice and although the second has typical tab holder toning for the issue the first captures the eye.
The obverse/reverse strike is also better on the first, however that could just be a photography rotation lighting issue.
I like #1 better....just better eye appeal.
K
1 for me too. Not even close.
Why is my reply so big? Testing, testing.
I like #1 better.
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
The one you like better is the better coin for your collection
Commems and Early Type
Coin #1 by far
For me, the top one all day long.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Ditto for #1.
the one where you can be truthful when you say rainbow, =#1
For me...#1
Number 1.... less tarnish....
Cheers, RickO
the 1st one looks better to me. not so much tarnish on it.
2
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
coinkat meant 1
1 man, 1
Only one 2 ?..phillips will help you get back to 1. J/K
"Better" is relative in this case.
Number one blows the other one away. This is a no contest.
Edited to add that the toning on number two is a minus not a plus.
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
I like them both, but prefer coin #1.
Number 1 is best
In with the crowd. #1
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
Another vote for #1. It just looks better.
Number 1 without a doubt
Latin American Collection
Ditto - #1.
1.
Yup. #1
At first I didn't like #1 due to the toning splotches on the head.
Then I saw #2 so now I prefer #1 hands down.
This
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"