It's nice but the coin is worth about 15K, so you're basically paying 10K for the plastic. No thanks. PLUS the same coin sold for just over 17K a mere 2 years ago!!! 25K is way overpriced IMHO.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
<< <i>No one has mentioned it yet that I read, but the coin is not holdered backwards or upside down. The NGC black slabs were designed for the NGC Logo side to be the "front", and the label with the grade and certification number was the reverse. Thus, CRO has pictured the reverse of the slab, but not the front. CAC also stickered the reverse of the slab, not the front.
It's a lovely coin in the pictures on CRO's site. The HA images are less than appealing. It's way over the top for my wallet, but to each his own. >>
I think most people know this and are saying "backwards" tongue in cheek
<< <i>Looks like a very nice MS66. At this grade level the black slab is sort of irrelevant. So is the gold sticker if you're ready to pay MS66 or better money.
PCGS is VERY tough when giving out MS67's on no stars dimes and half dimes. As a PCGS 66+ you're probably in the $25K range. PCGS MS67 is a lofty $57K.
If I time trip back to 1988 I made my first no stars dimes in MS65. It was an 1838-0 and was a NGC MS65 pop 1. I remember that MS65 type coins were on the sheet for $10K back then. They are really aren't all that much more money today. But, the pops are certainly a lot higher. >>
That is the quandary. In PCGS 66+ it's a push. In PCGS 67 it's at least double. In PCGS 66 ouch.
Mark
Walker Proof Digital Album Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>Looks like a very nice MS66. At this grade level the black slab is sort of irrelevant. So is the gold sticker if you're ready to pay MS66 or better money.
PCGS is VERY tough when giving out MS67's on no stars dimes and half dimes. As a PCGS 66+ you're probably in the $25K range. PCGS MS67 is a lofty $57K.
If I time trip back to 1988 I made my first no stars dimes in MS65. It was an 1838-0 and was a NGC MS65 pop 1. I remember that MS65 type coins were on the sheet for $10K back then. They are really aren't all that much more money today. But, the pops are certainly a lot higher. >>
That is the quandary. In PCGS 66+ it's a push. In PCGS 67 it's at least double. In PCGS 66 ouch.
<< <i>Looks like a very nice MS66. At this grade level the black slab is sort of irrelevant. So is the gold sticker if you're ready to pay MS66 or better money.
PCGS is VERY tough when giving out MS67's on no stars dimes and half dimes. As a PCGS 66+ you're probably in the $25K range. PCGS MS67 is a lofty $57K.
If I time trip back to 1988 I made my first no stars dimes in MS65. It was an 1838-0 and was a NGC MS65 pop 1. I remember that MS65 type coins were on the sheet for $10K back then. They are really aren't all that much more money today. But, the pops are certainly a lot higher. >>
That is the quandary. In PCGS 66+ it's a push. In PCGS 67 it's at least double. In PCGS 66 ouch.
Mark >>
There is a logic to cracking it, no doubt. >>
I just saw another listed in 66+ CAC for 35K so there is risk reward in this for sure. I like the CRO coin better. Then there is the hat.
Mark
Walker Proof Digital Album Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
And you can look at all the others out there in gem and above. And with the billions of dollars of certified coins available, the big money tends to go toward extremely rare coins, with an impressive story behind them.
<< <i>No one has mentioned it yet that I read, but the coin is not holdered backwards or upside down. The NGC black slabs were designed for the NGC Logo side to be the "front", and the label with the grade and certification number was the reverse. Thus, CRO has pictured the reverse of the slab, but not the front. CAC also stickered the reverse of the slab, not the front.
It's a lovely coin in the pictures on CRO's site. The HA images are less than appealing. It's way over the top for my wallet, but to each his own. >>
I think most people know this and are saying "backwards" tongue in cheek >>
Well excuse me, all knowing.
-Brandon -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins] -~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
<< <i>No one has mentioned it yet that I read, but the coin is not holdered backwards or upside down. The NGC black slabs were designed for the NGC Logo side to be the "front", and the label with the grade and certification number was the reverse. Thus, CRO has pictured the reverse of the slab, but not the front. CAC also stickered the reverse of the slab, not the front.
It's a lovely coin in the pictures on CRO's site. The HA images are less than appealing. It's way over the top for my wallet, but to each his own. >>
I think most people know this and are saying "backwards" tongue in cheek >>
Comments
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
<< <i>No one has mentioned it yet that I read, but the coin is not holdered backwards or upside down. The NGC black slabs were designed for the NGC Logo side to be the "front", and the label with the grade and certification number was the reverse. Thus, CRO has pictured the reverse of the slab, but not the front. CAC also stickered the reverse of the slab, not the front.
It's a lovely coin in the pictures on CRO's site. The HA images are less than appealing. It's way over the top for my wallet, but to each his own. >>
I think most people know this and are saying "backwards" tongue in cheek
Latin American Collection
<< <i>Looks like a very nice MS66. At this grade level the black slab is sort of irrelevant. So is the gold sticker if you're ready to pay MS66 or better money.
PCGS is VERY tough when giving out MS67's on no stars dimes and half dimes. As a PCGS 66+ you're probably in the $25K range. PCGS MS67 is a lofty $57K.
If I time trip back to 1988 I made my first no stars dimes in MS65. It was an 1838-0 and was a NGC MS65 pop 1. I remember that MS65 type coins were on the sheet for $10K back then. They are really aren't all that much more money today. But, the pops are certainly a lot higher. >>
That is the quandary. In PCGS 66+ it's a push. In PCGS 67 it's at least double. In PCGS 66 ouch.
Mark
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>
<< <i>Looks like a very nice MS66. At this grade level the black slab is sort of irrelevant. So is the gold sticker if you're ready to pay MS66 or better money.
PCGS is VERY tough when giving out MS67's on no stars dimes and half dimes. As a PCGS 66+ you're probably in the $25K range. PCGS MS67 is a lofty $57K.
If I time trip back to 1988 I made my first no stars dimes in MS65. It was an 1838-0 and was a NGC MS65 pop 1. I remember that MS65 type coins were on the sheet for $10K back then. They are really aren't all that much more money today. But, the pops are certainly a lot higher. >>
That is the quandary. In PCGS 66+ it's a push. In PCGS 67 it's at least double. In PCGS 66 ouch.
Mark >>
There is a logic to cracking it, no doubt.
Latin American Collection
<< <i>black slab (excessively rare) , gold sticker (excessive hard), tough coin..............The Triple Lindy.....................MJ >>
Of course, only one of those matters to me.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Looks like a very nice MS66. At this grade level the black slab is sort of irrelevant. So is the gold sticker if you're ready to pay MS66 or better money.
PCGS is VERY tough when giving out MS67's on no stars dimes and half dimes. As a PCGS 66+ you're probably in the $25K range. PCGS MS67 is a lofty $57K.
If I time trip back to 1988 I made my first no stars dimes in MS65. It was an 1838-0 and was a NGC MS65 pop 1. I remember that MS65 type coins were on the sheet for $10K back then. They are really aren't all that much more money today. But, the pops are certainly a lot higher. >>
That is the quandary. In PCGS 66+ it's a push. In PCGS 67 it's at least double. In PCGS 66 ouch.
Mark >>
There is a logic to cracking it, no doubt. >>
I just saw another listed in 66+ CAC for 35K so there is risk reward in this for sure. I like the CRO coin better. Then there is the hat.
Mark
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>Then there is the hat. >>
I'm waiting for the Michigan State version before pulling the trigger.
Latin American Collection
<< <i>zero chance for hitting a PCGS 67.. why ? I bet someone already submitted the coin w/holder to PCGS, for a lotto stab at 67 >>
You can't ask for a 2 point upgrade when submitting coins for crossover. You can't ask for ANY upgrade when doing so.
<< <i>zero chance for hitting a PCGS 67.. why ? I bet someone already submitted the coin w/holder to PCGS, for a lotto stab at 67 >>
Can you specify a min grade to cross above the current grade? Either way uber mint state crossovers rarely happen without cracking the coin out.
Latin American Collection
Here is a 66+(PCGS) that sold for $25K: Text
And you can look at all the others out there in gem and above. And with the billions of dollars of certified coins available, the big money tends to go toward extremely rare coins, with an impressive story behind them.
My YouTube Channel
<< <i>
<< <i>No one has mentioned it yet that I read, but the coin is not holdered backwards or upside down. The NGC black slabs were designed for the NGC Logo side to be the "front", and the label with the grade and certification number was the reverse. Thus, CRO has pictured the reverse of the slab, but not the front. CAC also stickered the reverse of the slab, not the front.
It's a lovely coin in the pictures on CRO's site. The HA images are less than appealing. It's way over the top for my wallet, but to each his own. >>
I think most people know this and are saying "backwards" tongue in cheek >>
Well excuse me, all knowing.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins]
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
<< <i>Boosibri: Can you specify a min grade to cross above the current grade? >>
I think most everyone knows that you can't.
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
My sets: [280+ horse coins] :: [France Sowers] :: [Colorful world copper] :: [Beautiful world coins]
-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>No one has mentioned it yet that I read, but the coin is not holdered backwards or upside down. The NGC black slabs were designed for the NGC Logo side to be the "front", and the label with the grade and certification number was the reverse. Thus, CRO has pictured the reverse of the slab, but not the front. CAC also stickered the reverse of the slab, not the front.
It's a lovely coin in the pictures on CRO's site. The HA images are less than appealing. It's way over the top for my wallet, but to each his own. >>
I think most people know this and are saying "backwards" tongue in cheek >>
Well excuse me, all knowing.
That cuts deep.
Latin American Collection