Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Does this have a chance at 66?

relicsncoinsrelicsncoins Posts: 8,300 ✭✭✭✭✭
It's currently in an OGH in 65. Not that it would matter since there is hardly any price difference between 65 and 66. It has the luster for a 66, but it has a couple of hits.



imageimage
Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions

Comments

  • Options
    AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 25,048 ✭✭✭✭✭
    yes and nicely toned. The weak strike is the only possible hold back.

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It looks like a nice quarter and in the era of reconsideration yesterdays 65's are today's 66's image

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Options
    Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I will say MS65 looks like a soft strike but you never know. image looking coin.


    Hoard the keys.
  • Options
    robertprrobertpr Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭
    Prominent hits on Washington's jaw, the eagle's right and left legs and right wing coupled with negative eye appeal (I realize that is toning but at first glance it looks like scratches on Washington's neck!) and the soft strike lead me to see this in a 64 holder as the most appropriate grade, to be honest. Maybe seeing it in hand would be different?
  • Options
    123cents123cents Posts: 7,178 ✭✭✭
    I think it is graded where it should be.
    image
  • Options
    LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Prominent hits on Washington's jaw, the eagle's right and left legs and right wing coupled with negative eye appeal (I realize that is toning but at first glance it looks like scratches on Washington's neck!) and the soft strike lead me to see this in a 64 holder as the most appropriate grade, to be honest. Maybe seeing it in hand would be different? >>


    image
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It will not make 66, best keep it where it is - could go down. Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    njcoincranknjcoincrank Posts: 1,066 ✭✭
    Yes

    njcc
    www.numismaticamericana.com
  • Options
    Make sure it's not a reengraved tail feather.1935 is the year but I'm not shure of the mint
    Mark Anderson
  • Options
    1tommy1tommy Posts: 3,040 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Make sure it's not a reengraved tail feather.1935 is the year but I'm not shure of the mint >>

    First I have seen many 66's in holders that don't look that good, but there is NO ETF on the 1935 unless it was a new discovery in the last week or two. my guess a 65 + Nice looking coin and if you want to get rid of it I would love to have it in the Old holder in my registry. pm me.......Enjoy image
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=UayFm2yCHV8
    I used to be famous now I just collect coins.


    Link to My Registry Set.

    https://pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-specialty-sets/washington-quarters-complete-variety-set-circulation-strikes-1932-1964/publishedset/78469

    Varieties Are The Spice Of LIFE and Thanks to Those who teach us what to search For.
  • Options
    Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If that toning is ugly, and the luster is as good as it looks in your pics. Dip it off and a 66 would be easy.
  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If that toning is ugly, and the luster is as good as it looks in your pics. Dip it off and a 66 would be easy. >>



    I don't think we are really seeing just how nice the peripheral tone is on this...

    If dipped it would take longer to find a home as another boring white Washie.
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Options
    DaveWcoinsDaveWcoins Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭
    yes
    Dave Wnuck. Redbook contributor; long time PNG Member; listed on the PCGS Board of Experts. PM me with your email address to receive my e-newsletter, and visit DaveWcoins.com Find me on eBay at davewcoins
  • Options
    TomBTomB Posts: 23,171 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Options
    jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,990 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I am going against the crowd, and say Solid 66 and still would get a cac sticker
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like it. Nice eye appeal and more a 66 than it is a 65. Strike looks fine for an early 1930's Washington quarter.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 33,981 ✭✭✭✭✭
    good grade and nice coin.
  • Options
    WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 10,385 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think so. Nice toning and original luster. Surfaces look pristine.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat Posts: 24,542 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The reverse is not helping the cause. This is a very close call- still a very nice coin

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file