Does this have a chance at 66?

Options
relicsncoins
relicsncoins Posts: 8,301 ✭✭✭✭✭
It's currently in an OGH in 65. Not that it would matter since there is hardly any price difference between 65 and 66. It has the luster for a 66, but it has a couple of hits.



imageimage
Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions

Comments

  • AUandAG
    AUandAG Posts: 25,050 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    yes and nicely toned. The weak strike is the only possible hold back.

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Broadstruck
    Broadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    It looks like a nice quarter and in the era of reconsideration yesterdays 65's are today's 66's image

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Type2
    Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    I will say MS65 looks like a soft strike but you never know. image looking coin.


    Hoard the keys.
  • robertpr
    robertpr Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭
    Options
    Prominent hits on Washington's jaw, the eagle's right and left legs and right wing coupled with negative eye appeal (I realize that is toning but at first glance it looks like scratches on Washington's neck!) and the soft strike lead me to see this in a 64 holder as the most appropriate grade, to be honest. Maybe seeing it in hand would be different?
  • 123cents
    123cents Posts: 7,178 ✭✭✭
    Options
    I think it is graded where it should be.
    image
  • LindeDad
    LindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options


    << <i>Prominent hits on Washington's jaw, the eagle's right and left legs and right wing coupled with negative eye appeal (I realize that is toning but at first glance it looks like scratches on Washington's neck!) and the soft strike lead me to see this in a 64 holder as the most appropriate grade, to be honest. Maybe seeing it in hand would be different? >>


    image
  • ricko
    ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    It will not make 66, best keep it where it is - could go down. Cheers, RickO
  • njcoincrank
    njcoincrank Posts: 1,066 ✭✭
    Options
    Yes

    njcc
    www.numismaticamericana.com
  • Coinstudy
    Options
    Make sure it's not a reengraved tail feather.1935 is the year but I'm not shure of the mint
    Mark Anderson
  • 1tommy
    1tommy Posts: 3,040 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options


    << <i>Make sure it's not a reengraved tail feather.1935 is the year but I'm not shure of the mint >>

    First I have seen many 66's in holders that don't look that good, but there is NO ETF on the 1935 unless it was a new discovery in the last week or two. my guess a 65 + Nice looking coin and if you want to get rid of it I would love to have it in the Old holder in my registry. pm me.......Enjoy image
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=UayFm2yCHV8
    I used to be famous now I just collect coins.


    Link to My Registry Set.

    https://pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-specialty-sets/washington-quarters-complete-variety-set-circulation-strikes-1932-1964/publishedset/78469

    Varieties Are The Spice Of LIFE and Thanks to Those who teach us what to search For.
  • Wabbit2313
    Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    If that toning is ugly, and the luster is as good as it looks in your pics. Dip it off and a 66 would be easy.
  • Broadstruck
    Broadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options


    << <i>If that toning is ugly, and the luster is as good as it looks in your pics. Dip it off and a 66 would be easy. >>



    I don't think we are really seeing just how nice the peripheral tone is on this...

    If dipped it would take longer to find a home as another boring white Washie.
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • DaveWcoins
    DaveWcoins Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭
    Options
    yes
    Dave Wnuck. Redbook contributor; long time PNG Member; listed on the PCGS Board of Experts. PM me with your email address to receive my e-newsletter, and visit DaveWcoins.com Find me on eBay at davewcoins
  • TomB
    TomB Posts: 23,189 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Yes.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • jdimmick
    jdimmick Posts: 9,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    I am going against the crowd, and say Solid 66 and still would get a cac sticker
  • roadrunner
    roadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    I like it. Nice eye appeal and more a 66 than it is a 65. Strike looks fine for an early 1930's Washington quarter.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • johnny9434
    johnny9434 Posts: 34,051 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    good grade and nice coin.
  • Walkerfan
    Walkerfan Posts: 10,391 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    I think so. Nice toning and original luster. Surfaces look pristine.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • coinkat
    coinkat Posts: 24,542 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    The reverse is not helping the cause. This is a very close call- still a very nice coin

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file