<< <i>What other Coins are out there like this? >>
Several coins are out there with provenance, question is if theres a market.
Several coins to the hussein family, Mubarak, Gadaffi and several of his sons. Many were given as gifts, but in gadaffi's case, found on his body after being executed. Same with hussein's sons and grandson.
Quite an interesting history. But I doubt theyll hold the attention of bonnie and clyde
Provenance can be interesting to some, personally, not for me. It is the coin I am interested in, the rest is (to me) nothing but fluff and hype. Cheers, RickO
<< <i>wow, 32k for a 28 dollar morgan? Well it does have provenance, etc >>
It's even more common than that. It is a 1921-P Morgan dollar, the most common of the most common. It is only in Fine condition as well, which would make it a $30 junk box special if it were not for the previous owner. If only that coin could talk ...
It was nice to see that the coin had not been polished. That is usually the fate of such things when they fall into the hands of relic collectors.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
I think there was something of Dillinger's up for auction recently. I remember seeing the Bonnie and Clyde car in the back of a semi at Kmart when I was a kid. Wild stuff.
Whenever a story about a coin gets passed this many times, one must wonder what the odds are of it being true. Bet it couldn't get certified by a major TPG as Clyde's coin.
No Way Out: Stimulus and Money Printing Are the Only Path Left
Provenance is always difficult to prove with non-unique items.
What about the one dollar bills that a titanic survivor allegedly had in his pocket during the sinking of the ship? Anybody getting excited over that here?
This is an example of the value of Provenance on steroids. In most collectible fields, provenance is very important, sometimes even required to prove authenticity. For obvious reasons, provenance does not often bear this burden when it comes to coins.
I disagree, however, with those who do not feel that provenance is an important aspect of a coin. Without the associated historical connections, coins are merely scrap metal. Indeed, coins are consigned to the melting pot on a regular basis, because the owner feels that the intrinsic value of the metal exceeds the value of the coin as a collectible.
I believe that the coin's real value is found in its status as an artifact of American history. Part of that history is the fact that it is an emission of a particular mint, in an identified year. In that sense, it is a snapshot of American history, particularly for the geographic region in which the piece was minted.
Equally important, in my opinion, is its subsequent history. Obviously, some of this can't be determined, but the possibility adds to the coin's mystique. Did the Carson City Seated Liberty Dollar trade hands in a "Wild West" poker game? Was it once stolen by Jesse James in a train robbery? Was it ever in the pocket of an American president? Was it owned by a renowned American collector? The latter example can sometimes be conclusively determined. For me, all of these possibilities add to the joy of ownership. In my opinion, that's what distinguishes a coin as an artifact of American history from its intrinsic value in the melting pot.
Am I the only person of the opinion that this is technically stolen property and should have been given to either the lawful owner (if they could figure out where it came from) or Barrow's descendants (since it was in his clothing)? One thing I know is that this posse member who "found" it in the jacket pocket, supposedly a deputized law enforcement official, had no claim to it... so imo this is a stolen "souvenir" from a crime scene that should have been inventoried and entered into evidence. Am I wrong here?
<< <i>As others have stated, the story is shaky and I would need more proof than that to shell out that kind of clam >>
Even if the story's true and it is as stated, I'd be more worried about someone wanting to file suit to get the item back because this posse member essentially stole it from the scene...
<< <i>Whenever a story about a coin gets passed this many times, one must wonder what the odds are of it being true. Bet it couldn't get certified by a major TPG as Clyde's coin. >>
They should try to get it labeled by PCGS with Clyde's name. It would help solidify the value in my opinion.
Winner of the "You Suck!" award March 17, 2010 by LanLord, doh, 123cents and Bear.
By the way, I have a 1879 silver dollar that was once owned by [Doc Holiday]. It was found near the O.K. Coral in Tombstone Arizona and it has a blood stain on it.
<< <i>Am I the only person of the opinion that this is technically stolen property and should have been given to either the lawful owner (if they could figure out where it came from) or Barrow's descendants (since it was in his clothing)? One thing I know is that this posse member who "found" it in the jacket pocket, supposedly a deputized law enforcement official, had no claim to it... so imo this is a stolen "souvenir" from a crime scene that should have been inventoried and entered into evidence. Am I wrong here? >>
Exactly what I was thinking.
"May the silver waves that bear you heavenward be filled with love’s whisperings"
"A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
<< <i>Am I the only person of the opinion that this is technically stolen property and should have been given to either the lawful owner (if they could figure out where it came from) or Barrow's descendants (since it was in his clothing)? One thing I know is that this posse member who "found" it in the jacket pocket, supposedly a deputized law enforcement official, had no claim to it... so imo this is a stolen "souvenir" from a crime scene that should have been inventoried and entered into evidence. Am I wrong here? >>
This was a scumbag BANK ROBBER and COP KILLER, romanticized by Hollywood. Of you are really concerned about returning "stolen property" then it should be donated to charities that take care of fallen officer's families, not Clyde Barrow.
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
Comments
Member, Society of Silver Dollar Collectors.
Looking for PCGS AU58+ 1901-P, 1896-O, & 1894-O
<< <i>What other Coins are out there like this? >>
Several coins are out there with provenance, question is if theres a market.
Several coins to the hussein family, Mubarak, Gadaffi and several of his sons.
Many were given as gifts, but in gadaffi's case, found on his body after being executed. Same with hussein's sons and grandson.
Quite an interesting history. But I doubt theyll hold the attention of bonnie and clyde
Free Trial
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org
<< <i>wow, 32k for a 28 dollar morgan?
It's even more common than that. It is a 1921-P Morgan dollar, the most common of the most common. It is only in Fine condition as well, which would make it a $30 junk box special if it were not for the previous owner. If only that coin could talk ...
It was nice to see that the coin had not been polished. That is usually the fate of such things when they fall into the hands of relic collectors.
<< <i>The chain of custody for that Morgan Dollar sure seems pretty shaky to me once it passed to mobster Paul Castellano. >>
And the pic of Bonnie looks nothing like Faye Dunaway.
K
My 1866 Philly Mint Set
No Way Out: Stimulus and Money Printing Are the Only Path Left
Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
Parker's gun went for over twice a pre-auction estimate.
Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.
I think in this case it has nothing to do about being a collectable coin, but an item tied to a great historical story (if it is true).
It could have easily been a pocket watch, his gun, (as were sold), or any other item, that alone, would have minimal value.
......I collect old stuff......
What about the one dollar bills that a titanic survivor allegedly had in his pocket during the sinking of the ship? Anybody getting excited over that here?
Like VOC Numismatics on facebook
I get the same thing what Morgan? Both links lead me to a letter signed by Governor Slick Willy about flag burning, which is protected speech.
this link works
Armand Castellano, convicted bank robbery get-away car driver in 1930 was given the coin by Paulie as a razz.
What is a razz?
By the way, I have a silver dollar that was once owned by [insert name of celebrity].
The Mysterious Egyptian Magic Coin
Coins in Movies
Coins on Television
I disagree, however, with those who do not feel that provenance is an important aspect of a coin. Without the associated historical connections, coins are merely scrap metal. Indeed, coins are consigned to the melting pot on a regular basis, because the owner feels that the intrinsic value of the metal exceeds the value of the coin as a collectible.
I believe that the coin's real value is found in its status as an artifact of American history. Part of that history is the fact that it is an emission of a particular mint, in an identified year. In that sense, it is a snapshot of American history, particularly for the geographic region in which the piece was minted.
Equally important, in my opinion, is its subsequent history. Obviously, some of this can't be determined, but the possibility adds to the coin's mystique. Did the Carson City Seated Liberty Dollar trade hands in a "Wild West" poker game? Was it once stolen by Jesse James in a train robbery? Was it ever in the pocket of an American president? Was it owned by a renowned American collector? The latter example can sometimes be conclusively determined. For me, all of these possibilities add to the joy of ownership. In my opinion, that's what distinguishes a coin as an artifact of American history from its intrinsic value in the melting pot.
RIP Mom- 1932-2012
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
I'll pass and spend my 32K on silver.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
<< <i>As others have stated, the story is shaky and I would need more proof than that to shell out that kind of clam >>
Even if the story's true and it is as stated, I'd be more worried about someone wanting to file suit to get the item back because this posse member essentially stole it from the scene...
RIP Mom- 1932-2012
Lafayette Grading Set
<< <i>Whenever a story about a coin gets passed this many times, one must wonder what the odds are of it being true. Bet it couldn't get certified by a major TPG as Clyde's coin. >>
They should try to get it labeled by PCGS with Clyde's name. It would help solidify the value in my opinion.
But the story associated with that Morgan Dollar is a stretch. I wouldn't have bought it for a fraction of that price.
<< <i>But the story associated with that Morgan Dollar is a stretch. I wouldn't have bought it for a fraction of that price. >>
I agree that the provenance on this piece is shaky and I don't find it appealing.
Dave
<< <i>Am I the only person of the opinion that this is technically stolen property and should have been given to either the lawful owner (if they could figure out where it came from) or Barrow's descendants (since it was in his clothing)? One thing I know is that this posse member who "found" it in the jacket pocket, supposedly a deputized law enforcement official, had no claim to it... so imo this is a stolen "souvenir" from a crime scene that should have been inventoried and entered into evidence. Am I wrong here? >>
Exactly what I was thinking.
"A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
<< <i>Am I the only person of the opinion that this is technically stolen property and should have been given to either the lawful owner (if they could figure out where it came from) or Barrow's descendants (since it was in his clothing)? One thing I know is that this posse member who "found" it in the jacket pocket, supposedly a deputized law enforcement official, had no claim to it... so imo this is a stolen "souvenir" from a crime scene that should have been inventoried and entered into evidence. Am I wrong here? >>
This was a scumbag BANK ROBBER and COP KILLER, romanticized by Hollywood. Of you are really concerned about returning "stolen property" then it should be donated to charities that take care of fallen officer's families, not Clyde Barrow.
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."