Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Crossover potential?

Comments

  • TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭
    Maybe.
    There are a lot of marks on the obverse.
    We know it is not going to grade MS, so it can only stay the same or go down.

    I've submitted old small ANACS holdered coins to PCGS and some go up (rarely) but it's about a 50/50 chance they go down a grade for me.image
  • coindeucecoindeuce Posts: 13,490 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Fifty three.

    "Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
    http://www.american-legacy-coins.com

  • jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't think so. I see rub on the high parts of the cheek, ensuring an AU grade, but too many hits to warrant a 58. I see a 55.
  • goldengolden Posts: 9,958 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No.
  • oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,478 ✭✭✭✭✭
    One way to find out...looks like she was bobbing for french fries.
    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't think so

    Latin American Collection

  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not if I sent it in.....
    My Current project....https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/mysetregistry/album/160794
  • guitarwesguitarwes Posts: 9,289 ✭✭✭
    I think it's low AU. Looks a bit cleaned and retoned from those pics, but that's just my eye.



    To me, an AU58 looks like a MS63/64 coin with just a wisp of wear on the highpoints.

    @ Elite CNC Routing & Woodworks on Facebook. Check out my work.
    Too many positive BST transactions with too many members to list.
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,547 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It shouldn't as it appears to have been cleaned and then picked up some retoning around the rim.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • BIGAL2749BIGAL2749 Posts: 742 ✭✭✭✭
    not a chance
  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I see the coin as a technical 55, but one that would be netted to 50/53 at PCGS because of the cleaning.

    If the coin was blast white, might go 55.

    You know they like the white look on these.
  • mercurydimeguymercurydimeguy Posts: 4,625 ✭✭✭✭
    I can't see this in an PCGS AU58 holder...it might come back cleaned if you crack so send it for a cross, with no risk.
  • ElcontadorElcontador Posts: 7,629 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Leave that one alone, crack it out and it'll come back in a body bag.
    "Vou invadir o Nordeste,
    "Seu cabra da peste,
    "Sou Mangueira......."
  • kazkaz Posts: 9,238 ✭✭✭✭✭
    from the photos, it looks more 53-ish, probably dipped and retoned. On a bad day it might come back 'no grade.' I think it looks happy in its old white holder.
  • Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭


    If you check minimum 53, you might even get a 55. No way on 58.
  • SonorandesertratSonorandesertrat Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That one is not likely to cross at grade.
    Member: EAC, NBS, C4, CWTS, ANA

    RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'

    CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,475 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Enough meat on that bone to go MS 60 +, if image only it hadn't been dipped with a slight rub, long ago…. and far away.

    Still, a lot of coin there.
  • nankrautnankraut Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: mannie gray

    I see the coin as a technical 55, but one that would be netted to 50/53 at PCGS because of the cleaning.

    If the coin was blast white, might go 55.

    You know they like the white look on these.




    +1



    I'm the Proud recipient of a genuine "you suck" award dated 1/24/05. I was accepted into the "Circle of Trust" on 3/9/09.
  • DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Too scruffy. AU 53 me thinks.



    What's going on with the 7 in the date? Recut?
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭
    For what it's worth....



    I have an 1896-O Morgan that doesn't look as close to MS as your Barber. But I bought it as an XF, and sent it ANACS with some confidence it would make 50. (There is a price jump, and I was proud to "score").



    Anyway, it came back as 58!!



    I think ANACS was a little loose, at the time anyway, in the AU range. I have a few other stray AU-58's in ANACS holders that I doubt would cross at that grade.
    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • MilkmanDanMilkmanDan Posts: 3,751 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a PCGS 55 to me. Good luck.
  • ms70ms70 Posts: 13,956 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It looks too baggy and was cleaned just a little too much. It's an attractive coin for what it is. Keep us posted if you submit!

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Despite the respect I have for the small, white classic ANACS holders, I also think it should not be graded as an original/non-cleaned coin based on the bright white, scratchy centers. Then again, photos can be deceiving, and what "should" happen does not always come to pass.

    image
  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭
    How many people would grade this one AU50 and give it a pass as a non-cleaned coin? PCGS did- and it's an older, solid blue holder. Maybe it was not one of their finer moments, or maybe it's just a lousy pic?

    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...