Home U.S. Coin Forum

ANA News: ANA Board to consider site selections for future conventions

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, February 23, 2015

CONTACT: Jake Sherlock

Telephone: 719-482-9872

Email: pr@money.org

ANA Board to consider site selections for future conventions

Governors meeting at National Money Show will be broadcast online


The American Numismatic Association Board of Governors will hold an Open Session and Town Hall during the Portland National Money ShowSM starting at 8:30 a.m. (Pacific Standard Time) on Saturday, March 7, in Room F150 at the Oregon Convention Center. The Open Session and Town Hall meeting will be broadcast online at Money.org and NationalMoneyShow.com with a replay available immediately afterward on the ANA's YouTube channel.

The board will discuss site selection for the 2019, 2020 and 2021 World's Fair of Money conventions. Proposed host cities include Baltimore, Boston, Chicago (Rosemont), Milwaukee, New Orleans, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, Seattle and Washington, D.C.

The board will also discuss site selection for the 2018, 2019, and 2020 National Money Shows. Proposed hosts include Atlanta, Austin, Charlotte, Las Vegas, Nashville, Phoenix, Raleigh, San Antonio and Virginia Beach.

Other agenda items include:

A proposal to change the requirements for Life Members. The proposal would require applicants for life membership to be ANA members for two consecutive years. Currently, the Bylaws require membership for three years before a member can become a Life Member. ​

A proposal to name Jim Fitzgerald the host chair and the Texas Numismatic Association and Dallas Coin Club as the host clubs for the 2016 National Money Show, which will be held March 3-5 in Dallas.

A 15-minute open discussion with the membership conducted by ANA President Walt Ostromecki and Bylaws Committee Chair Doug Andrews to review the impact of potential proposed changes to the election process and terms for the Board of Governors.


The board will take questions from the membership following the Open Session. Members who cannot attend will be able to ask questions during the live meeting through Twitter (@ANACoins) and Facebook (Facebook.com/numismatics).

The full agenda for the board meeting is online at Money.org/BOG under "Minutes and Agendas."

The American Numismatic Association is a congressionally chartered nonprofit educational organization dedicated to encouraging people to study and collect money and related items. The ANA helps its 25,500 members and the public discover and explore the world of money through its vast array of education and outreach programs, as well as its museum, library, publications, conventions and seminars. For more information, call 719-632-2646 or go to www.money.org.
Many Quality coins for sale at http://www.CommonCentsRareCoins.com
«134

Comments

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,697 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Please not New Orleans for the World's Fair of Money. We were there in 1972 and 1981. It is miserably hot in August and is nothing but a slum. We have been to Chicago enough in the last few years. Baltimore, Boston, Milwaukee and Washington, D.C. would be fine.
  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,021 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image
  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 5,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What I can't understand is why isn't Pittsburgh on the list??

    Big question in my mind!

    No sales tax on coin or bullion

    Reasonable hotel rates
    Reasonable places to eat

    A large percentage of ANA members within eight hour drive of Pittsburgh ( I believe 75%)

    Lower parking rates than other cities.

    So what is the problem.
    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,499 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>What I can't understand is why isn't Pittsburgh on the list??

    Big question in my mind!

    No sales tax on coin or bullion

    Reasonable hotel rates
    Reasonable places to eat

    A large percentage of ANA members within eight hour drive of Pittsburgh ( I believe 75%)

    Lower parking rates than other cities.

    So what is the problem. >>



    how are the union arrangements there? I understand Philadelphia won't get a show again because of the hassle and expense related to "union rules"
  • TwobitcollectorTwobitcollector Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The Convention Center in Philly clean up it's act with the unions and should be considered for a future site.
    Positive BST Transactions with:
    INYNWHWeTrust-TexasNationals,ajaan,blu62vette
    coinJP, Outhaul ,illini420,MICHAELDIXON, Fade to Black,epcjimi1,19Lyds,SNMAN,JerseyJoe, bigjpst, DMWJR , lordmarcovan, Weiss,Mfriday4962,UtahCoin,Downtown1974,pitboss,RichieURich,Bullsitter,JDsCoins,toyz4geo,jshaulis, mustanggt, SNMAN, MWallace, ms71
  • TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭
    Seattle should win based on Slammer's picture alone
  • EagleEyeEagleEye Posts: 7,677 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Seattle is a good choice, but the problem is finding a hall that is available, cost effective and the proper size.

    As I understand it, Philly is now in contention, since the labor unions lost their contract with the Convention Center.
    Rick Snow, Eagle Eye Rare Coins, Inc.Check out my new web site:
  • I'd love to see the conventions hit Boston, would be great to drive an hour to the show each day and sleep in my own bed at night haha
    JG Numismatics
    Check out:
    coinsinnh.com
    or just type in JGnumismatics into google
    PCGS/NGC Authorized Dealer
    CAC Authorized Dealer
    ANA Member
    CSNS Member
    FUN Member
    Roundtable Trading member

    References: USMarine6,Commoncents05,Timbuk3, lunytune2,Goldcoin98, and many more

  • EVillageProwlerEVillageProwler Posts: 5,856 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would love anywhere in the Northeast USA: Baltimore, DC and even Boston.

    BTW, why did the unions lose their contract with the PCC? I know there was a hassle related to the now defunct Whitman show there, but the last Summer ANA show there was fine. Was their losing the contract related to the hassles at the Whitman show, or just a coincidence?

    I live between Phily and NYC, so Phily would be an easy drive for me (just like last time).

    EVP

    How does one get a hater to stop hating?

    I can be reached at evillageprowler@gmail.com

  • This content has been removed.
  • To address the various questions / suggestions...



    << <i> I understand Philadelphia won't get a show again because of the hassle and expense related to "union rules". >>



    Philadelphia will be hosting the 2018 World's Fair of Money. As indicated, the union situation in Philadelphia is much improved than in past years.



    << <i>What I can't understand is why isn't Pittsburgh on the list?? >>



    Probably because of Philadelphia in 2018.



    << <i>Seattle should win based on Slammer's picture alone >>



    The Seattle Convention Center considers the ANA show too small and will not bid for the convention.

    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.
  • SwampboySwampboy Posts: 13,004 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The Seattle Convention Center considers the ANA show too small and will not bid for the convention.
    Greg
    >>



    Greg, the Convention Center is not what I think of when I think of an ANA event.

    This is ......Stadium Exhibition Center

    A call to booking would get all the answers needed in this regard.

    Slammer.
    Keep at it, you'll get the hang of that DSLR sooner or later.

    "Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso

  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,801 ✭✭✭✭✭
    OK. Here's a plug for Salt Lake City:

    1) Delta hub with direct flights to 90 US cities.
    2) The airport is 8 miles from downtown with easy taxi or light rail service.
    3) 6975 hotel rooms within 1 mile of the Salt Palace Convention Center.
    4) Millions of restaurants within walking distance of the Convention Center (PF Chang's, Ruth's Chris, Naked Fish, etc.)
    5) Fresh mountain air (smoggy temperature inversions possible in the winter).
    6) Enormous recent downtown renovation projects are now all up & operational.
    7) Historical sites.
    8) Mountains. Real ones!

    image


  • << <i>
    Greg, the Convention Center is not what I think of when I think of an ANA event.

    This is ......Stadium Exhibition Center

    A call to booking would get all the answers needed in this regard.
    >>



    That facility would not work for several reasons:

    1) There are no hotels in the immediate vicinity. Dealers are not going to want to take taxi's a mile or more to a hotel every day, nor would they want to ride shuttle buses (not that it is within the ANA's budget to do so).

    2) For a World's Fair of Money, the ANA needs 200,000 contiguous square feet of exhibition space, along with meeting rooms. While that facility totals 200k sq ft, it's split across two halls, without additional meeting rooms.

    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.
  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Milwaukee? With a 5.6% sales tax that applies to coin sales, with no maximum?

    Sort of kills the show, doesn't it?

    Why would ANA even consider any location where there is a significant sales tax on coins with no limitation? Bad idea.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • I vote San fran but I don't really care. Just not Rosemount again
  • CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,631 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I vote San fran but I don't really care. Just not Rosemount again >>



    Hang in there, just a few more months until the Chicago experiment is behind us. Kudos to the Chicago Coin Club for a herculean effort over many years.


  • << <i>I vote San fran but I don't really care. Just not Rosemount again >>



    San Francisco considers the ANA convention to be too small for them to bid.

    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.


  • << <i>Milwaukee? With a 5.6% sales tax that applies to coin sales, with no maximum?

    Sort of kills the show, doesn't it?

    Why would ANA even consider any location where there is a significant sales tax on coins with no limitation? Bad idea. >>



    And this is likely why it won't be in Milwaukee...

    Having said that, the number of locations possible for the ANA conventions is quite small if you exclude all taxable locales.

    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.
  • LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,396 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Seems like Portland and Seattle are fine for the March show but the ANA probably takes a lot of heat from the East Coast crowd (dealers and collectors) for the travel time and distances.

    Besides, how many great collections are out this way since TDN moved to Las Vegas?? image
    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose.
  • WTCGWTCG Posts: 8,940 ✭✭✭
    Of the cities listed to host the ANA WFM I'll put my money on Milwaukee being selected no matter what. There are better choices in my opinion (D.C., Boston, Seattle) but the ANA board has always had an obsessive fetish with wanting the ANA convention in Milwaukee. D.C. would be my first choice but chances are that will never happen.

    For the Money Show my preference would be for Las Vegas and Austin. New Orleans is a place I like visiting but the 2013 Money Show proved that New Orleans is not an ideal choice for any type of coin show. Atlanta and Nashville are the worst options.
    Follow me on Twitter @wtcgroup
    Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"


  • << <i>Seems like Portland and Seattle are fine for the March show but the ANA probably takes a lot of heat from the East Coast crowd (dealers and collectors) for the travel time and distances.
    >>



    The West Coast is actually quite well represented over the next few years:
      2015 National Money Show - Portland
      2016 World's Fair of Money - Anaheim
      2017 World's Fair of Money - Denver
    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.


  • << <i>Of the cities listed to host the ANA WFM I'll put my money on Milwaukee being selected no matter what. There are better choices in my opinion (D.C., Boston, Seattle) but the ANA board has always had an obsessive fetish with wanting the ANA convention in Milwaukee. D.C. would be my first choice but chances are that will never happen.

    For the Money Show my preference would be for Las Vegas and Austin. New Orleans is a place I like visiting but the 2013 Money Show proved that New Orleans is not an ideal choice for any type of coin show. Atlanta and Nashville are the worst options. >>



    Milwaukee and D.C. are taxable locations, so that's a major impediment. There is a STRONG desire to go to DC.. but we need to work out an exemption in order to do so. Las Vegas is taxable as well.

    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • WTCGWTCG Posts: 8,940 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>Of the cities listed to host the ANA WFM I'll put my money on Milwaukee being selected no matter what. There are better choices in my opinion (D.C., Boston, Seattle) but the ANA board has always had an obsessive fetish with wanting the ANA convention in Milwaukee. D.C. would be my first choice but chances are that will never happen.

    For the Money Show my preference would be for Las Vegas and Austin. New Orleans is a place I like visiting but the 2013 Money Show proved that New Orleans is not an ideal choice for any type of coin show. Atlanta and Nashville are the worst options. >>



    Milwaukee and D.C. are taxable locations, so that's a major impediment. There is a STRONG desire to go to DC.. but we need to work out an exemption in order to do so. Las Vegas is taxable as well.

    Greg >>



    All of California is taxable but we still have numerous large size conventions there throughout the year. A tax exemption is a plus but in my opinion it is not mandatory nor a prerequisite for an ANA convention. Don't Massachusetts and Washington (state) have tax issues as well?

    My concern with D.C. is that D.C., similar to SF, NYC and Seattle, might consider the ANA convention as being too small to host. If there is a strong desire to go to D.C. then by all means pursue that to the best of the organization's ability.
    Follow me on Twitter @wtcgroup
    Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"
  • dogwooddogwood Posts: 1,935 ✭✭✭✭
    San Jose had it a few years ago as I recall but the city scheduled a stupid Grand Prix street race that weekend so they moved the convention to San francisco.
    The race was one and done.
    We're no Long Beach, that's for sure.
    (Race or coin show)
    We're all born MS70. I'm about a Fine 15 right now.
  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 5,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If the ANA cared about taxes on coin and bullion they would take a FIRM stance and hold the conventions in states that have no sales tax on the coins and bullion.

    That way other states may follow in order to benifit local businesses and collect taxes on the added revenue gained from coin conventions.

    Who's side is the ANA on?

    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • WTCGWTCG Posts: 8,940 ✭✭✭


    << <i>San Jose had it a few years ago as I recall but the city scheduled a stupid Grand Prix street race that weekend so they moved the convention to San francisco.
    The race was one and done.
    We're no Long Beach, that's for sure.
    (Race or coin show) >>



    There are reasons why San Jose is referred to as the "Khloe Kardashian of the big Bay Area cities"...

    I think the race happened two years. Either way the race was for a fifth string racing circuit event hosted by a city desperate for tourists and attention. The way San Jose treated the ANA back in 2005 was reprehensible.
    Follow me on Twitter @wtcgroup
    Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"


  • << <i>All of California is taxable but we still have numerous large size conventions there throughout the year. A tax exemption is a plus but in my opinion it is not mandatory nor a prerequisite for an ANA convention. Don't Massachusetts and Washington (state) have tax issues as well?

    My concern with D.C. is that D.C., similar to SF, NYC and Seattle, might consider the ANA convention as being too small to host. If there is a strong desire to go to D.C. then by all means pursue that to the best of the organization's ability. >>



    California is an odd-ball where taxation only applies once you do a certain number of days business in-state. Long Beach keeps their shows below that number... but once you add additional shows, it gets tricky.

    Massachusetts is tax-exempt for sales above $1000. Washington is tax-exempt for all numismatic purchases.

    DC is interested in having the ANA show, but we need to find a way to gain a tax exemption for the convention to be held there.

    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.
  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 5,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What states do not have sales tax on coins and bullion?

    I will start with PA.
    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211




  • << <i>If the ANA cared about taxes on coin and bullion they would take a FIRM stance and hold the conventions in states that have no sales tax on the coins and bullion.

    That way other states may follow in order to benifit local businesses and collect taxes on the added revenue gained from coin conventions.

    Who's side is the ANA on? >>



    If you want to limit ANA shows to only states with no taxation, you're down to a very short list:

    Alaska - No suitable locations
    Arizona - Phoenix (But not a desirable location for a summer convention and not considered a good convention city)
    California - San Diego, Los Angeles, San Jose - But Nexus issues exist (SF considers us too small)
    Colorado - Denver
    Connecticut - No suitable locations
    Delaware - No suitable locations
    Florida - Orlando, Tampa
    Georgia - Atlanta
    Idaho - No suitable locations
    Illinois - Rosemont
    Iowa - No suitable locations
    Louisiana - New Orleans
    Maryland - Baltimore
    Massachusetts - Boston
    Michigan - Detroit
    Missouri - St. Louis, Kansas City
    Montana - No suitable locations
    New Hampshire - No suitable locations
    New York - NYC considers us too small
    North Dakota - No suitable locations
    Oregon - Portland
    Pennsylvania - Philadelphia, Pittsburgh
    Rhode Island - No suitable locations
    South Carolina - No suitable locations
    South Dakota - No suitable locations
    Texas - Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston, Austin, San Antonio
    Utah - Salt Lake City
    Washington - Seattle considers us too small
    Wyoming - No suitable locations

    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.
  • WTCGWTCG Posts: 8,940 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>All of California is taxable but we still have numerous large size conventions there throughout the year. A tax exemption is a plus but in my opinion it is not mandatory nor a prerequisite for an ANA convention. Don't Massachusetts and Washington (state) have tax issues as well?

    My concern with D.C. is that D.C., similar to SF, NYC and Seattle, might consider the ANA convention as being too small to host. If there is a strong desire to go to D.C. then by all means pursue that to the best of the organization's ability. >>



    California is an odd-ball where taxation only applies once you do a certain number of days business in-state. Long Beach keeps their shows below that number... but once you add additional shows, it gets tricky.

    Massachusetts is tax-exempt for sales above $1000. Washington is tax-exempt for all numismatic purchases.

    DC is interested in having the ANA show, but we need to find a way to gain a tax exemption for the convention to be held there.

    Greg >>



    D.C. is known for being a bit of a tax-happy place compared to its neighboring states. How are the chances that the district government will grant a tax exemption for one specific convention such as the ANA convention?
    Follow me on Twitter @wtcgroup
    Authorized dealer for PCGS, PCGS Currency, NGC, NCS, PMG, CAC. Member of the PNG, ANA. Member dealer of CoinPlex and CCE/FACTS as "CH5"


  • << <i>How are the chances that the district government will grant a tax exemption for one specific convention such as the ANA convention? >>



    We're trying....


    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,015 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>... Don't Massachusetts and Washington (state) have tax issues as well? >>


    If I recall, the ANA show in Boston a few years ago happened to coincide, at least partially, with a back-to-school sales tax holiday.
  • This content has been removed.
  • segojasegoja Posts: 6,136 ✭✭✭✭
    When did Maryland repeal sales tax on coins? I collected and paid sales tax at the last Baltimore show.

    Just today I received my temporary tax permit for the upcoming show.

    Have I and the Whitman folks been missing something?
    JMSCoins Website Link


    Ike Specialist

    Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986

    image
  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 5,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's better to have a short list than no list at all!
    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211




  • << <i>When did Maryland repeal sales tax on coins? I collected and paid sales tax at the last Baltimore show. >>



    According to the information I have from ICTA, Maryland is tax-exempt for sales over $1000. Additionally, for wholesale transactions, dealers need a specific Maryland license.
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.
  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 5,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maryland also has a law reguarding how may show a year a dealer can do in a year.

    And the fact that a collector that spends less than $1000.00 still has to pay sales tax.


    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • segojasegoja Posts: 6,136 ✭✭✭✭
    Greg,

    You are exactly right in your last post about Maryland, but that is certainly not "no taxation" as per your previous post.

    We should NEVER hold an ANA in any state that has any taxation on coins. Use the little bit of clout we have.

    Just one dealers perspective.
    JMSCoins Website Link


    Ike Specialist

    Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986

    image
  • WildIdeaWildIdea Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>If the ANA cared about taxes on coin and bullion they would take a FIRM stance and hold the conventions in states that have no sales tax on the coins and bullion.

    That way other states may follow in order to benifit local businesses and collect taxes on the added revenue gained from coin conventions.

    Who's side is the ANA on? >>



    Bingo!

    No sales tax for coins and bullion in South Dakota.........for what it's worth.
  • claychaserclaychaser Posts: 4,406 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>When did Maryland repeal sales tax on coins? I collected and paid sales tax at the last Baltimore show.

    Just today I received my temporary tax permit for the upcoming show.

    Have I and the Whitman folks been missing something? >>



    Maryland is one of those states where sales over a certain amount are exempt. Maryland is over $1000 is exempt, California $1500, etc.


    ==Looking for pre WW2 Commems in PCGS Rattler holders, 1851-O Three Cent Silvers in all grades



    Successful, problem free and pleasant transactions with: illini420, coinguy1, weather11am,wayneherndon,wondercoin,Topdollarpaid,Julian, bishdigg,seateddime, peicesofme,ajia,CoinRaritiesOnline,savoyspecial,Boom, TorinoCobra71, ModernCoinMart, WTCG, slinc, Patches, Gerard, pocketpiececommems, BigJohnD, RickMilauskas, mirabella, Smittys, LeeG, TomB, DeusExMachina, tydye


  • << <i>We should NEVER hold an ANA in any state that has any taxation on coins. Use the little bit of clout we have. >>



    Let me show you where that leaves us... would people really be happy with that short of a list?

    Arizona - Phoenix (But not a desirable location for a summer convention and not considered a good convention city)
    Colorado - Denver
    Georgia - Atlanta
    Illinois - Rosemont
    Louisiana - New Orleans
    Michigan - Detroit
    Missouri - St. Louis, Kansas City
    Oregon - Portland
    Pennsylvania - Philadelphia, Pittsburgh
    Texas - Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston, Austin, San Antonio
    Utah - Salt Lake City

    Other states eliminated:

    Alaska - No suitable locations
    California - Tax nexus
    Connecticut - No suitable locations
    Delaware - No suitable locations
    Florida - Sales tax on foreign coins and bullion
    Idaho - No suitable locations
    Iowa - No suitable locations
    Maryland - Tax over $1000
    Massachusetts - Tax over $1000
    Montana - No suitable locations
    New Hampshire - No suitable locations
    New York - Tax over $1000
    North Dakota - No suitable locations
    Rhode Island - No suitable locations
    South Carolina - No suitable locations
    South Dakota - No suitable locations
    Washington - Seattle considers us too small
    Wyoming - No suitable locations

    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,015 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>If the ANA cared about taxes on coin and bullion they would take a FIRM stance and hold the conventions in states that have no sales tax on the coins and bullion.

    That way other states may follow in order to benifit local businesses and collect taxes on the added revenue gained from coin conventions.

    Who's side is the ANA on? >>



    Bingo!

    No sales tax for coins and bullion in South Dakota.........for what it's worth. >>


    Yes.

    And from what I hear, Sturgis, SD is able to host a large convention.
  • segojasegoja Posts: 6,136 ✭✭✭✭
    So the entire city of Seattle says no to a convention from the ANA???

    I would think some venue near Seattle would more than welcome a moderate size convention like the ANA.

    I think more diligence needs to be done on some of the possible other locations in states that do not have sales tax.

    The short list is still a good list and gives more than ample opportunity to rotate show locations.
    JMSCoins Website Link


    Ike Specialist

    Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986

    image


  • << <i>So the entire city of Seattle says no to a convention from the ANA???

    I would think some venue near Seattle would more than welcome a moderate size convention like the ANA. >>



    The ANA requires 200,000 sq ft. of contiguous exhibit space. That eliminates 98% of the convention facilities in the country. Add to that the need for nearby / attached hotels (security) and an airport with mainline jet service and it eliminates almost all cities.

    There was a recommendation earlier for the CenturyLink field's exhibition space -- except there are no hotels nearby and the space isn't as large as we need.

    Basically we are a large convention -- without the associated food & beverage expense that many convention centers expect for such a gathering.

    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.
  • claychaserclaychaser Posts: 4,406 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>We should NEVER hold an ANA in any state that has any taxation on coins. Use the little bit of clout we have. >>



    Let me show you where that leaves us... would people really be happy with that short of a list?

    Michigan - Detroit

    Greg >>



    Greg, Grand Rapids, MI has a modern convention with a 162,000 square foot convention hall. Plus jet service from the major airlines and Southwest Airlines. It's also in driving range of Chicago.

    It's just a world apart from Detroit. What say you?



    ==Looking for pre WW2 Commems in PCGS Rattler holders, 1851-O Three Cent Silvers in all grades



    Successful, problem free and pleasant transactions with: illini420, coinguy1, weather11am,wayneherndon,wondercoin,Topdollarpaid,Julian, bishdigg,seateddime, peicesofme,ajia,CoinRaritiesOnline,savoyspecial,Boom, TorinoCobra71, ModernCoinMart, WTCG, slinc, Patches, Gerard, pocketpiececommems, BigJohnD, RickMilauskas, mirabella, Smittys, LeeG, TomB, DeusExMachina, tydye
  • DavideoDavideo Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>We should NEVER hold an ANA in any state that has any taxation on coins. Use the little bit of clout we have. >>



    Let me show you where that leaves us... would people really be happy with that short of a list?

    Michigan - Detroit

    Greg >>



    Greg, Grand Rapids, MI has a modern convention with a 162,000 square foot convention hall. Plus jet service from the major airlines and Southwest Airlines. It's also in driving range of Chicago.

    It's just a world apart from Detroit. What say you? >>



    That would be well short of 200,000 square foot requirement outlined in the post just above.


  • << <i>Greg, Grand Rapids, MI has a modern convention with a 162,000 square foot convention hall. Plus jet service from the major airlines and Southwest Airlines. It's also in driving range of Chicago.

    It's just a world apart from Detroit. What say you? >>



    ANA shows require 200,000 sq ft in an single exhibit hall. Additionally, I believe many flights into GRR are on regional jets which require checking most carryon bags.

    Greg
    Greg Lyon, ANA Board of Governors 2011-2017 -- The views represented here are my own personal opinions and do not represent those of the American Numismatic Association.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file