cross at any grade or crack out

I have a couple of coins that are nice and CAC'ed in the 2-4k range each . I don't think there is much downside and I would like them in PCGS holders and i am curious about the outcome. My question is should I crackout the coins or should I send them in as cross at any grade? Are there any special considerations? The coins in question are:
1856 Double Eaglein NGC AU53 CAC (expectation is that it will grade the same at PCGS)
1893 NGS PR66 CAC Barber dime in an old holder (i think it will CAMEO or maybe even DCAM)
Thanks,
Tony
1856 Double Eaglein NGC AU53 CAC (expectation is that it will grade the same at PCGS)
1893 NGS PR66 CAC Barber dime in an old holder (i think it will CAMEO or maybe even DCAM)
Thanks,
Tony
0
Comments
Latin American Collection
Crossing has a premium fee that raw coins do not. Lots of us feel we get a better shake with a raw coin. PCGS prefers it too because they get to see the entire coin raw. So they don't have to be conservative, worrying about a hidden problem.
The raw downside is the risk of getting "genuine". If that's not a worry I would recommend sending them in raw.
Lance.
[URL=http://s1233.photobucket.com/user/alaporta/media/1856rev_zpsce7eeb5e.jpg.html]
[URL=http://s1233.photobucket.com/user/alaporta/media/1893ob_zpsc6578220.jpg.html]
[URL=http://s1233.photobucket.com/user/alaporta/media/1893rev_zps8f50597d.jpg.html]
The dime may CAM but the price gap is small between non-CAM and CAM...and I just don't see a DCAM there. Still, sweet piece!
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
'I'm guess the dime would not cross in that holder. The plastic on the NGC holders of that age is not very good, and a grader erring on the side of caution when grading it through the plastic will not say PR66."
+1
Which one is now not quite like the others?
JMHO