Options
NGC certifies Eric Newman Collection

Link to article
Great score for NGC. I am sorry that PCGS did not land this one. I hope that me keeping them busy grading and photographing my widgets did not affect their ability to compete for the grading rights.
Great score for NGC. I am sorry that PCGS did not land this one. I hope that me keeping them busy grading and photographing my widgets did not affect their ability to compete for the grading rights.

0
Comments
siliconvalleycoins.com
<< <i>I predict a majority of the Newman coins holdered ATS will eventually (sooner, rather than later) end up in PCGS holders. >>
RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'
CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
<< <i>With all due respect to our hosts and fine friends across the street, this is a situation where the holder really doesn't matter, except to the extent that it verifies the Newman provenance. >>
I mostly agree...
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
<< <i>I predict a majority of the Newman coins holdered ATS will eventually (sooner, rather than later) end up in PCGS holders. >>
Well, in that case, put them there in the first place and save me the trouble and expense (and downgrades).
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
siliconvalleycoins.com
<< <i>I predict a majority of the Newman coins holdered ATS will eventually (sooner, rather than later) end up in PCGS holders. >>
Yup. Any coin that can legitimately make that transition will do so. Having the coins in NGC holders will be a great advantage to those dealers and sharp eye collectors who
can figure out which coins will eventually cross. This way they can buy the coins for 5-30% less in the NGC holders just as they've been doing for the past 4 years. The pedigree isn't
going to prevent that from happening. The recent sale of the NGC MS68 1792 half disme only reinforced this point. But I would agree that on major rarities, this effect should be less
than if NGC slabbed the entire Newman collection. The market currently values most coins on what they would bring if graded by PCGS.
<< <i>I predict a majority of the Newman coins holdered ATS will eventually (sooner, rather than later) end up in PCGS holders. >>
While perhaps not entirely typical, I think the 1852 Humbert $10 in MS68 will not suffer if it doesn't cross.
If I were planning a long-term hold I'd just let everything sit in the current holders and think about gaming the TPGs later.
It will probably matter very little what brand of picture frames are used for what I expect will be a slew of Rembrandt's.
Coin Rarities Online
<< <i>I'm guessing P and N and all of the auction houses will get their share before all is said and done. >>
I hope CRO and RYK do, too.
It is a real coup for NGC to get this deal. This kind if advertising is extremely valuable.
And, yes, these coins were bumped to the front of the line, ahead if my dreck and your schlock. They should be.
<< <i>Wonder if it has anything to do with PCGS' wait time for submissions. >>
Um, no.
Coin Rarities Online
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
P.S. RYK your coins aren't dreck, I know what dreck is, and they're not dreck (I think you owe them an apology).
<< <i>It will probably matter very little what brand of picture frames are used for what I expect will be a slew of Rembrandt's.
This.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
Or they just didn't want to pay the higher grading fees. Coins at PCGS above $100k now cost the grading fee PLUS 1%. NGC may have given them a deal on top of that as well.
If others have a different judgment, please chime in.
<< <i>Many of these coins are unique or extremely rare. I doubt that the grade or holder brand will matter so much. The prices will be insane, nothing like we have seen in the recent years.
It is a real coup for NGC to get this deal. This kind if advertising is extremely valuable.
And, yes, these coins were bumped to the front of the line, ahead if my dreck and your schlock. They should be. >>
+1
This is a great collection, filled with pieces that qualify as both unique and rare.
<< <i>With all due respect to our hosts and fine friends across the street, this is a situation where the holder really doesn't matter, except to the extent that it verifies the Newman provenance. >>
I disagree. This is going to create huge uncertainty. When you are spending top dollar for the top coin, you need to factor the risk of it not crossing, and when you do that, you no longer have top dollar. If you still have top dollar, then you have bidders willing to take extreme risk.
For example, consider a census rarity coin in NGC 66, and the top grade at PCGS is 64. How strongly would you bid for the next NGC 66? NGC65*? MGC64?
<< <i>
<< <i>With all due respect to our hosts and fine friends across the street, this is a situation where the holder really doesn't matter, except to the extent that it verifies the Newman provenance. >>
I disagree. This is going to create huge uncertainty. When you are spending top dollar for the top coin, you need to factor the risk of it not crossing, and when you do that, you no longer have top dollar. If you still have top dollar, then you have bidders willing to take extreme risk.
For example, consider a census rarity coin in NGC 66, and the top grade at PCGS is 64. How strongly would you bid for the next NGC 66? NGC65*? MGC64? >>
Why get these coins graded in the first place if it is going to create uncertainty?
For example, consider a census rarity coin in NGC 66, and the top grade at PCGS is 64. How strongly would you bid for the next NGC 66? NGC65*? MGC64?
God, I hope Eric Newman doesn't see this thread.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>disagree. This is going to create huge uncertainty. When you are spending top dollar for the top coin, you need to factor the risk of it not crossing, and when you do that, you no longer have top dollar. If you still have top dollar, then you have bidders willing to take extreme risk.
For example, consider a census rarity coin in NGC 66, and the top grade at PCGS is 64. How strongly would you bid for the next NGC 66? NGC65*? MGC64?
God, I hope Eric Newman doesn't see this thread. >>
He only has himself to blame.
<< <i>disagree. This is going to create huge uncertainty. When you are spending top dollar for the top coin, you need to factor the risk of it not crossing, and when you do that, you no longer have top dollar. If you still have top dollar, then you have bidders willing to take extreme risk.
For example, consider a census rarity coin in NGC 66, and the top grade at PCGS is 64. How strongly would you bid for the next NGC 66? NGC65*? MGC64?
God, I hope Eric Newman doesn't see this thread. >>
Truer words are rarely spoken. MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>This is going to create huge uncertainty. >>
This is not the first time coins have ever been sold in NGC holders, is it?
Coin Rarities Online
(Of course, in the aftermarket there will be a free-for-all.)
I run by his house tomorrow. I will pop in and ask him to crack those suckers out.
<< <i>Not sure why anyone with a CACed coin would find it in his interest (to say nothing of the risk) to try to cross it.
If others have a different judgment, please chime in. >>
Well, you could check auction prices realized and test your hypothesis yourself.
Coin Rarities Online
Or even raw?
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
If the rest of my collection was in PCGS holders, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Mixed sets aggravate the heck out of me.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>Not sure why anyone with a CACed coin would find it in his interest (to say nothing of the risk) to try to cross it.
If the rest of my collection was in PCGS holders, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Mixed sets aggravate the heck out of me. >>
+1
<< <i>Or even raw? >>
Blasphemy!
That's when I'd be willing to pay you 5% .......
That's when I'd be willing to pay you 5% ......
Cool! I get to make 5% right after Hell freezes over!
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>f the rest of my collection was in PCGS holders, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Mixed sets aggravate the heck out of me. >> +1 >>
+2
Why else would collectors take a near-certain* financial hit trying to cross to PCGS?
*the only way it wouldn't be a hit is a cross, probably at grade, where the PCGS-to-whatever-it-was-in-before delta is > 1%, plus grading & transit fees