Home U.S. Coin Forum

Please post your Seated Liberty images.

1818284868797

Comments

  • seduloussedulous Posts: 3,250 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LanLord Stunning '36!

    A Barber Quartet is made up of Nickels, Dimes, Quarters, and Halves.

  • No HeadlightsNo Headlights Posts: 2,056 ✭✭✭✭✭

    45 is the lowest grade to be eligible for a plus grade. I can certainly see why this coin received a plus. Very nice, congratulations.

  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very tough quarter in PCGS XF40. Congrats.

  • semikeycollectorsemikeycollector Posts: 1,072 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    Cross post from GTG thread. Resubmitted and got a bump from 15 to 20, which is where it should be.

    Rare especially in Vf and higher grades, original, lovely toning, looks more like VF-30. Love it!!!

  • semikeycollectorsemikeycollector Posts: 1,072 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    A few of the nicer coins from my latest submission.




    Dude, you have a great set of Liberty Seated Quarters!!!

  • Clackamas1Clackamas1 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LJenkins11 said:
    My initial response was "a much nicer version" than mine! Yours appears to be WB-5. Great looking coin.

    Thank you. I think your coin is PQ for an XF45. There is still luster in the devices. I would say that should green bean all day long.

  • LJenkins11LJenkins11 Posts: 786 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great looking 73-CC @Manifest_Destiny !

  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 3,622 ✭✭✭✭✭

    ...

    @LJenkins11 said:
    1868, XF40, WB-1, Mintage 417,600, R-3

    Wear-wise, that is at least a EF45. Nice strike as well.

    1868 is another sleeper coin that made a fool out of me. I debated with the seller over the stated grade while being completely oblivious of the outstanding price he was asking for the coin. Dumb.

    3 rim nicks away from Good
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,050 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBN , hubba hubba!

  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 3,622 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is essentially my show report.

    After a long wait in a short line to submit my coins for grading (including 14 SLH, 2 BH, 2 commems, and a 14-D Lincoln cent), I had enough time to wander around looking for Larry Briggs and his wonderful World of Seated Coins. I need a circulated 79 and 82 half, and also need to replace a cleaned 1885 and 1888. He didn't have a circulated 79 or 82, but he had a nice PL AU55-ish 1888 with nicely toned, mirrored surfaces, and lightly frosted devices for a good price. I had to check the rims to make sure it wasn't an impaired proof. Mr. Briggs didn't stay long as it was late. Nice to see he's getting around better now than he was last year.

    I chatted with Larry's assistant, also called Larry, and started talking nonsense by confusing the 80's dates for some of the 50, 51, and 52 Philly and NO coins that circulated down to low grades outside the US. They're cool condition super-rarities. Some of the 80s coins are rare in circulated grades, but they likely circulated in the US and not elsewhere. Probably too tired from the drive and the long wait standing in line.

    Anyway, I spotted two 42-O small dates he had for a reasonable price. I ended up purchasing an ICG VG10 with all letters in LIBERTY visible. It was likely dipped long ago and has retoned to a rich brown color. I don't see any hairlines except on the knee or other issues that bug me. I'm quite pleased with the coin. I like the date, its rarity of (approximately 100 existing specimens according to Coin Facts), and small letters reverses in general and don't anticipate any problems crossing them to PCGS. It might even upgrade with that full LIBERTY.

    The problem with purchasing coins at shows is I don't have photos of them. I'll try to see what I can do with a cell phone.

    My initial goal was to fill a Dansco with raw, original coins that should straight grade. The problem with having coins graded is I cannot enjoy what would be a 5-lb heavy Dansco with the first four pages now filled with seated halves. Well, there is that extra 1866 slot for a THE 66 No Motto, but I fill it with one of my Oregon commemoratives. Pages 5 (CC coins) and 6 ("the Stopper" and most of the "Maginot Line" - my name for '79-'90 halves) are brutal.

    3 rim nicks away from Good
  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 3,622 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 14, 2023 4:00PM

    @JBN said:

    WOW! A beautiful, well-struck 70-S. Must be an AU59+.

    My 70-S is a VG8.

    3 rim nicks away from Good
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,050 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That's cool @Barberian , do you remember what year it was when you picked it up?

  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 3,622 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 31, 2023 2:12PM

    @Cladiator said:
    That's cool @Barberian , do you remember what year it was when you picked it up?

    1. It brought an end of the futile Barber half wars (2005-2006) for original, midgrade halves with the "Barber e-pirates" (They know who they are!) while adrift on a sea of cleaned eBay coins. Bidding 50% over price guide for an original coin was just the opening 'parry.'

    You see, I've got the SLH Dansco out of the SDB at the moment so I can select coins for grading. Over the course of that FUN process, I just discovered that the "cropping" tool expands the scan images size, so now I can scan raw coins and expand them to a viewable size. I can display many of the remaining inexpensive (back then), common date, raw, original coins that got me fired up early on about collecting SLHs years ago. More on that later...

    The 1853 was THE "Pioneer coin," one of the darkly toned, original coins I was looking to collect, and the A&R reverse is glorious! Unfortunately, I didn't save seller's photos back then. Now, I'm sending many of my Dansco coins in for grading and am wondering if the 1853 will straight grade despite the planchet defect. PCGS can indicate planchet defect all they want; I just want the straight grade for an otherwise choice coin. (LOL!) I think it's proper in this case, given that the planchet streak is rather small and narrow, to give both a number grade and mention the defect. I'm hoping PCGS will show some charity toward this wonderful but unfortunate coin. Puh-lease! Not the "VF-details" grade and being forever shunned!

    Maybe this coin can continue pioneering and become the first details coin to receive CAC approval. That'd be cool.

    3 rim nicks away from Good
  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 7,215 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Perhaps you can apply some balm to the wound? :D

    Seated Half Society member #38
    "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 3,622 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Catbert said:
    Perhaps you can apply some balm to the wound? :D

    "SNAKEBITE!"

    3 rim nicks away from Good
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,050 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 31, 2023 11:23AM

    You're right about scanners being bad at capturing proof fields. Those devices though, they look magnificent and based off your description of the color I bet this is one of those coins that will blow your head off in-hand.

    Edit to add: The nick on the chest kind of blends in. I didn't even notice it until you pointed it out.

  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 3,622 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 31, 2023 3:16PM

    @Cladiator said:
    You're right about scanners being bad at capturing proof fields. Those devices though, they look magnificent and based off your description of the color I bet this is one of those coins that will blow your head off in-hand.

    Edit to add: The nick on the chest kind of blends in. I didn't even notice it until you pointed it out.

    It's got its flaws including some small corrosion spots between the lettering and the rim, but it made me look, and I thought "that's a lot of coin for the price" without knowing the recent prices realized for 1888s. Who knows the prices of these low-mint Philly coins anyway these days other than a specialist? And Mr. Briggs knows and moves lots of these late Philly coins. So, I grabbed it, and it's now the only proof in my collection if it's indeed a proof.

    To be clear, both this coin and the 1842-O small date were very reasonably priced for the quality of coin received. The 42-O SD is an excellent candidate to upgrade a grade or two based upon its wear and considering its die marriage (the eagle on reverse die A in 1842 was horrible - see Bugert 2011: p. 86 and below). Sorry, I don't have photos of my coin yet and cannot scan it, but here's an MS62 to illustrate the potential problem for graders with this die marriage.

    I assume the 1888 is an impaired proof from the cameo frost, mirrors and rims, but I'm not certain.

    3 rim nicks away from Good
  • BarberianBarberian Posts: 3,622 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There should be a "WOW!" button for coins like @POCKETCHANGE's coins.

    3 rim nicks away from Good

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file