Poll: From an aesthetic standpoint, which modern gold coin do you like better?

Ignore mintages, politics, price, value, and appreciation potential.
A. Reverse Proof AGE

B. UHR
A. Reverse Proof AGE

B. UHR

0
Comments
I like the UHR.
On the other hand, I gave my UHR a quick look and flipped it for a small profit, with no regrets and no interest in buying another. I guess I agree with Steve and his friend. Nothing special.
I have seen each one in person, but not together at the same time. Still, they each hold high interest for me for their own attributes.
I would still like to see a proof or reverse proof version of the UHR! I wonder if that could be a future US Mint product?
<< <i>No pandas? >>
Maybe next time.
Quite frankly, I just do not consider them as part of the US coin repertoire and therefore give them little consideration for my collection. I am not sure that I can recall even seeing them in person, though no doubt I have glanced upon them at a coin show.
<< <i>That Reverse Proof sure looks good! >>
Yes it does...it's my choice.
sadly-based on price I wouldnt be willing to spend almost triple spot for one..
And now I firmly believe the apocalypse is upon us-- Longacre is hanging out at automotive flea markets and buying pry bars, and RYK is asking questions about modern bullion.
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
look familiar?
<< <i> like the Ultra High Relief far more than the reverse Proof, but to be honest I think that the original St. Gaudens High Relief $20 gold is better than both of them >>
However, to address the OP, A.
"Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso
The overall appearance of the coin turned out a whole lot better on the Reverse Proof Gold Eagles than on the Platinum Reverse Proofs, where the entirety of Liberty's visage looks like the Terminator 3 android. It also turned out better than the Silver Reverse Proof, which has striated fields instead of pebbly fields.
On the Reverse Proof Gold Eagle, they got it perfect.
The UHR is cool, but for some reason I like the larger diameter 1 oz. coins better than the thicker 1 oz. coins.
I knew it would happen.
Specifically, I'd choose the Reverse Proof but a slight margin.
peacockcoins
<< <i>A friend of mine, upon receiving his UHR from the Mint, remarked "it's just a low relief figure in a deep dish." I'm inclined to agree. >>
You actually consider the figure to be low relief? Did you actually look at the coin?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I didn't buy either one. I'm with BillJones. The original High Relief is best
U.S. Type Set
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>
<< <i>A friend of mine, upon receiving his UHR from the Mint, remarked "it's just a low relief figure in a deep dish." I'm inclined to agree. >>
You actually consider the figure to be low relief? Did you actually look at the coin? >>
Yep, the coin is pretty mediocre. Now the original UHR, I saw the one in the NY Federal Reserve Bank's collection, is much much nicer.
<< <i>The Mexican Gold Libertad is by far the most attractive modern gold bullion coin around.
That's pretty but it looks too much like the hood ornament on an antique car.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>The Britannia side of the Britannia is incredible but the old mug of the Queen, I could do without that. >>
True
UHR C+
original Hi Relief B+
Normal Business strike Saint A+
<< <i>
<< <i>The Britannia side of the Britannia is incredible but the old mug of the Queen, I could do without that. >>
True >>
The portrait of the Queen on the original Maples was quite attractive. If they married the Britannia with that portrait I'd be all over it.
<< <i>I personally think the reverse proof is hideous. >>
I agree with you 100%!
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution