Does your coin exhibit any luster? What's its composition? One would assume that U.S. old copper without luster and red has been likely improperly cleaned or chemically altered.
This is an interesting piece bearing the Blofield Calvary design, one familiar to many collectors of colonial coins since it also appears on one of the rare Talbot mules.
And this is a top condition piece, with about half of the original mint red remaining.
Does your coin exhibit any luster? What's its composition? One would assume that U.S. old copper without luster and red has been likely improperly cleaned or chemically altered. >>
These are large pieces made of copper weighing 51.2 grams I would not say that there is any luster on either of these pieces, but here is a 1795 that is a strong AU example that I believe shows luster.
Here is a 1773 Virginia half penny. Don't get too excited. This is a hoard coin. There are a few hundred Mint State pieces known. But I have seen them as low as VG.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
Wish I still had a picture of the 1798 Large Cent AG3 Red I had......but even thought it said red, I have to believe that it was a mechanical error......it was red, but an AG3?
Craig If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
If you think any red copper older than an IHC is original, you are living in a fantasy world (and there are very few original, red IHCs). Copper is just too reactive a metal to remain red for that length of time, unless stored in an inert environment.
<< <i>If you think any red copper older than an IHC is original, you are living in a fantasy world (and there are very few original, red IHCs). Copper is just too reactive a metal to remain red for that length of time, unless stored in an inert environment. >>
Barry,
So I take it you believe that it is impossible for there to have been an inert environment to protect any older red copper coins until Indian Head Cents entered circulation? Is that something you believe based on your own personal laboratory examinations of EVERY existing specimen of early red copper? Or is that just your ASSUMPTION based on normal chemical principles and your ASSUMPTION that there we no collectors around (or other circumstances) to preserve red copper coins until the advent of the Indian Head Cent?
The half cent I posted was from a known hoard, an original unopened keg of half cents that remained undisturbed from its time of striking until it came into the possession of the Chapman brothers in the late 1800's or early 1900's. The Chapman brothers opened the keg and distributed the coins to collectors, who, at that time (and since they paid premiums to purchase the coins) then sought to preserve them in their collections. Most of the coins from the hoard (presumably those near the sides of the keg) display quite a bit of carbon spotting from the effects of the environment, while others like this one (presumably from the center of the keg) remained pristine. If you think about it, coins at the center of the keg would be insulated from the environment even futher by the other coins. Those coins would absorb the effects of the environment (and become rather spotty in the process), but would protect the inner coins much like today's "Intercept Shield" materials.
Or, maybe I'm just drinking the Kool-Aid, and the chemical effects of the intercept shields are just a fantasy in my imagination?
Supergem - You have a fantastic Half Cent, senhor! My oldest RB coin is an 1835 Classic Half Cent in 5 RB. My oldest full RD copper is an 09 P IHC (in 5 RD).
"Vou invadir o Nordeste, "Seu cabra da peste, "Sou Mangueira......."
<< <i>If you think any red copper older than an IHC is original, you are living in a fantasy world (and there are very few original, red IHCs). Copper is just too reactive a metal to remain red for that length of time, unless stored in an inert environment. >>
Barry,
So I take it you believe that it is impossible for there to have been an inert environment to protect any older red copper coins until Indian Head Cents entered circulation? Is that something you believe based on your own personal laboratory examinations of EVERY existing specimen of early red copper? Or is that just your ASSUMPTION based on normal chemical principles and your ASSUMPTION that there we no collectors around (or other circumstances) to preserve red copper coins until the advent of the Indian Head Cent?
The half cent I posted was from a known hoard, an original unopened keg of half cents that remained undisturbed from its time of striking until it came into the possession of the Chapman brothers in the late 1800's or early 1900's. The Chapman brothers opened the keg and distributed the coins to collectors, who, at that time (and since they paid premiums to purchase the coins) then sought to preserve them in their collections. Most of the coins from the hoard (presumably those near the sides of the keg) display quite a bit of carbon spotting from the effects of the environment, while others like this one (presumably from the center of the keg) remained pristine. If you think about it, coins at the center of the keg would be insulated from the environment even futher by the other coins. Those coins would absorb the effects of the environment (and become rather spotty in the process), but would protect the inner coins much like today's "Intercept Shield" materials.
Or, maybe I'm just drinking the Kool-Aid, and the chemical effects of the intercept shields are just a fantasy in my imagination? >>
Supergem, I don't care what Barry says about the originality of your red half cent, I'll pay you a nice premium to PCGS price guide if you'd like to sell.
Supergem - I don't know the history of your coin. Perhaps it was in a mostly airtight environment for many years and it is original. It's possible. I don't know. There are exceptions to every rule, but in my opinion, 99.9% of early copper that's red has been messed with. It's the nature (no pun intended) of the beast, just like puttied gold, and ATed silver.
This link shows mostly bronzed medals manufactured under the hands of Messrs. Bolton & Watt (the steam engine guy * ).
As you can see, these were preserved in custom-fitted brass shells with silver linings. In effect, the shells acted as environmental 'scavengers'.
There also exist the most perfect and pristine bronzed, red copper and gilt proof versions if the Irish currency coins which were also from the Watt Family sale. The last I saw, Evan Gale, was the owner, and I believe one of our own board members actually purchased those or several different examples of the Watt holdings back in 2003/4.
Anyway, think of those shells as Intercept Shields, B.C.
Barry's point is well taken that many old copper coins that are "red" have had something done to them through the years, however there are some original ones still out there. The 1723 Hibernia I posted is an original red coin although the photo is a little darker than the coin looks in hand. I also saw a beautiful Rosa in 65red a year or so ago that CRO consigned to Heritage that was beautiful and original.
No doubt that 1806 is a lovely original red coin. Did any of you check out the red half cents in Stewart's collection last year? There were a number of them -- red and original.
Francis Cokayne was an English collector around the beginning of the 20th century who collected, among other things the finest 1790's Conder tokens available. His collection was auctioned of in the 1940's and has been mostly off the market since. A number of his pieces have recently hit the market through several major Conder token dealers. I have had the pleasure to see a number of these, including quite a few that were fully red and completely original.
R.I.P. Wayne, Brad Collecting: Conder tokens 19th & 20th Century coins from Great Britain and the Realm
JRocco - very cool specimens! Looks like the 5 KOPEKS is triple struck based on the left facing wing.
Stephanie - nice cud and the Birds and Beasts token is way cool! I want one too!!!
Props to the 1806 half cent. What a beaut!
I once had an 1870 IHC that was slabbed MS65 in a gold PCI holder Well, all I can say about that is the color looked fine to these eyes and she was virtually devoid of marks with full and flashy luster. The buyer reported that she did not cross. But, he was still happy with her. No pics handy unfortunately.
I think Barry's comments above are generally sound other than I suspect there are a few more legit exceptions than he would likely allow.
Comments
Does your coin exhibit any luster? What's its composition? One would assume that U.S. old copper without luster and red has been likely improperly cleaned or chemically altered.
Stefanie
(1790s) Blofield Cavalry / Norfolk Conder Token Halfpenny
MS65 RB [NGC]
Dalton & Hamer 6B; plain edge.
This is an interesting piece bearing the Blofield Calvary design, one familiar to many collectors of colonial coins
since it also appears on one of the rare Talbot mules.
And this is a top condition piece, with about half of the original mint red remaining.
oops, fixed the image
NGC64 RB
.
CoinsAreFun Toned Silver Eagle Proof Album
.
Gallery Mint Museum, Ron Landis& Joe Rust, The beginnings of the Golden Dollar
.
More CoinsAreFun Pictorials NGC
<< <i>Actually, here is an older Full Red beauty, 1776. with a nice restruck date
I love it!!!
But, I have a love for all Russian
Stefanie
.
CoinsAreFun Toned Silver Eagle Proof Album
.
Gallery Mint Museum, Ron Landis& Joe Rust, The beginnings of the Golden Dollar
.
More CoinsAreFun Pictorials NGC
<< <i>jrocco:
Does your coin exhibit any luster? What's its composition? One would assume that U.S. old copper without luster and red has been likely improperly cleaned or chemically altered. >>
These are large pieces made of copper weighing 51.2 grams
I would not say that there is any luster on either of these pieces, but
here is a 1795 that is a strong AU example that I believe shows luster.
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
<< <i>
Stefanie this one is gorgeus
I don't know about red, but it's early and definitely copper
R
LA KINGS #11 - KOPITAR
If I had it my way, stupidity would be painful!
<< <i>
K S
Ankur
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
<< <i>If you think any red copper older than an IHC is original, you are living in a fantasy world (and there are very few original, red IHCs). Copper is just too reactive a metal to remain red for that length of time, unless stored in an inert environment. >>
Barry,
So I take it you believe that it is impossible for there to have been an inert environment to protect any older red copper coins until Indian Head Cents entered circulation? Is that something you believe based on your own personal laboratory examinations of EVERY existing specimen of early red copper? Or is that just your ASSUMPTION based on normal chemical principles and your ASSUMPTION that there we no collectors around (or other circumstances) to preserve red copper coins until the advent of the Indian Head Cent?
The half cent I posted was from a known hoard, an original unopened keg of half cents that remained undisturbed from its time of striking until it came into the possession of the Chapman brothers in the late 1800's or early 1900's. The Chapman brothers opened the keg and distributed the coins to collectors, who, at that time (and since they paid premiums to purchase the coins) then sought to preserve them in their collections. Most of the coins from the hoard (presumably those near the sides of the keg) display quite a bit of carbon spotting from the effects of the environment, while others like this one (presumably from the center of the keg) remained pristine. If you think about it, coins at the center of the keg would be insulated from the environment even futher by the other coins. Those coins would absorb the effects of the environment (and become rather spotty in the process), but would protect the inner coins much like today's "Intercept Shield" materials.
Or, maybe I'm just drinking the Kool-Aid, and the chemical effects of the intercept shields are just a fantasy in my imagination?
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
<< <i>
<< <i>If you think any red copper older than an IHC is original, you are living in a fantasy world (and there are very few original, red IHCs). Copper is just too reactive a metal to remain red for that length of time, unless stored in an inert environment. >>
Barry,
So I take it you believe that it is impossible for there to have been an inert environment to protect any older red copper coins until Indian Head Cents entered circulation? Is that something you believe based on your own personal laboratory examinations of EVERY existing specimen of early red copper? Or is that just your ASSUMPTION based on normal chemical principles and your ASSUMPTION that there we no collectors around (or other circumstances) to preserve red copper coins until the advent of the Indian Head Cent?
The half cent I posted was from a known hoard, an original unopened keg of half cents that remained undisturbed from its time of striking until it came into the possession of the Chapman brothers in the late 1800's or early 1900's. The Chapman brothers opened the keg and distributed the coins to collectors, who, at that time (and since they paid premiums to purchase the coins) then sought to preserve them in their collections. Most of the coins from the hoard (presumably those near the sides of the keg) display quite a bit of carbon spotting from the effects of the environment, while others like this one (presumably from the center of the keg) remained pristine. If you think about it, coins at the center of the keg would be insulated from the environment even futher by the other coins. Those coins would absorb the effects of the environment (and become rather spotty in the process), but would protect the inner coins much like today's "Intercept Shield" materials.
Or, maybe I'm just drinking the Kool-Aid, and the chemical effects of the intercept shields are just a fantasy in my imagination?
Supergem,
I don't care what Barry says about the originality of your red half cent, I'll pay you a nice premium to PCGS price guide if you'd like to sell.
SmallEagle (in fantasy world)
Who is John Galt?
There are exceptions to every rule, but in my opinion, 99.9% of early copper that's red has been messed with. It's the nature (no pun intended) of the beast, just like puttied gold, and ATed silver.
This link shows mostly bronzed medals manufactured under the hands of Messrs. Bolton & Watt (the steam engine guy * ).
As you can see, these were preserved in custom-fitted brass shells with silver linings. In effect, the shells acted as environmental 'scavengers'.
There also exist the most perfect and pristine bronzed, red copper and gilt proof versions if the Irish currency coins which were also from the Watt Family sale. The last I saw, Evan Gale, was the owner, and I believe one of our own board members actually purchased those or several different examples of the Watt holdings back in 2003/4.
Anyway, think of those shells as Intercept Shields, B.C.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
No doubt that 1806 is a lovely original red coin. Did any of you check out the red half cents in Stewart's collection last year? There were a number of them -- red and original.
Collecting:
Conder tokens
19th & 20th Century coins from Great Britain and the Realm
<< <i>This dates to the second half of the 1600's:
Very cool!!
Fly-In Club
My PCGS Registry Sets
JRocco - very cool specimens! Looks like the 5 KOPEKS is triple struck based on the left facing wing.
Stephanie - nice cud and the Birds and Beasts token is way cool! I want one too!!!
Props to the 1806 half cent. What a beaut!
I once had an 1870 IHC that was slabbed MS65 in a gold PCI holder
I think Barry's comments above are generally sound other than I suspect there are a few more legit exceptions than he would likely allow.
<< <i>
Would LOVE to see that in hand. WOW.