Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1911 Brown Lincoln, Thoughts?

Ok, I was visiting my folks in South Jersey today and decided to stop by the local coin shop. I always page through the old school Lincoln Binders looking for something that the owner missed. I guess some would call this cherrypicking. Most the time I find the typical run of the mill heavily circulated stuff that is overgraded or accurately graded but occasionally I stumble across something. Today, I believe I stumbled upon something.

This 1911 Lincoln was in a 2x2 cardboard flip (3 staples securing it shut, why do they still use dangerous staples w/coins???) and graded VF. My cursory inspection of the coin said AU at least with a very real shot at uncirculated (brown).

I believe this coin to be MS64ish as opposed to the VF that it was listed at. I cannot definitively rule out cleaned and re-toned though.

Thoughts?

.....................image
.....................image
imageimage
Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
ANA Member R-3147111

Comments

  • Options
    rgCoinGuyrgCoinGuy Posts: 7,478
    My thoughts? nice pickup!
    imageQuid pro quo. Yes or no?
  • Options
    I'd say it's a nice pick... Can't tell if the coin has any rub on it from the pick, but it looks like it has a shot at UNC. Looks like a solid strike too. In any case, definitely better than VF.
    "Coins used by a nation are one of the most enduring records of the art and mechanical skill of its age"
    -Mint Director Frank Leach
  • Options
    LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    Solid 58, and I can see it in a 61 holder. I will give that coin a sticker, too.
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • Options
    drwstr123drwstr123 Posts: 7,053 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice strike, probably an early die state. Nice appeal. Mike
  • Options
    ArizonaJackArizonaJack Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭
    I really like it
    " YOU SUCK " Awarded 5/18/08
  • Options
    lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,895 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice job! I like it. 62BN is certainly possible. Are you going to send it for TPG-grading?
  • Options
    thisnamztakenthisnamztaken Posts: 4,101 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice Lincoln. I would say Ch. AU.
    I never thought that growing old would happen so fast.
    - Jim
  • Options
    63BN
  • Options
    OneCentOneCent Posts: 3,561


    << <i>Nice job! I like it. 62BN is certainly possible. Are you going to send it for TPG-grading? >>



    No. I am looking for a PQ one in PCGS 65RB for my registry set. I am a Lincoln junkie and couldn't pass on a coin that was obviously not VF. Plus, I sorta like the thrill of the hunt. In my experience many non-specialist B&M dealers assume that a brown Lincoln cannot be uncirculated. Most of my cherrypicks from B&M's have been unc brown Lincolns.

    How they came to the conclusion that this one was VF is beyond me, though.

    I could still see this as a 63-64BN, and I do appreciate the opinions!!!

    image

    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • Options
    RedneckHBRedneckHB Posts: 20,155 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice.

    63bn
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • Options
    ambro51ambro51 Posts: 14,345 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Beachcomber?
  • Options
    Awesome coin. great eye appeal. I have seen worse in 63/64 slabs. That is the type of coin find that makes this hobby so much fun in my opinion.
  • Options
    OneCentOneCent Posts: 3,561


    << <i>Beachcomber? >>



    No.
    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • Options
    Looks decent! The obverse looks nicer than the reverse which seems to lack some luster. Usually it is the other way around. I can't tell if it is choice AU or choice Unc. Anyway I agree it ain't VF. image
  • Options
    SkyManSkyMan Posts: 9,592 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice lookin' cherrypick! image
  • Options
    NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 11,036 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks low MS. MS-62 BN.
  • Options
    Looks like a 64BN.....if folks think it's an AU I am ok with that as it might have a rub.....but how can a coin that clean be a 62??? image
  • Options
    NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 11,036 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Looks like a 64BN.....if folks think it's an AU I am ok with that as it might have a rub.....but how can a coin that clean be a 62??? image >>


    Market grading because it may have rub.image
  • Options
    gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sure looks like a 64 to me.

    Al
  • Options


    << <i>

    << <i>Looks like a 64BN.....if folks think it's an AU I am ok with that as it might have a rub.....but how can a coin that clean be a 62??? image >>


    Market grading because it may have rub.image >>



    image Ok I can live with that explanation or else I am going to look for some 62's that look like that coin image
  • Options
    coindudeonebaycoindudeonebay Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭
    Can you see part of the VDB on the reverse? I have always heard tell of coins, 1910 and 1911 that showed part of the VDB but never seen one personally, but this one looks like it does.
  • Options
    <<Can you see part of the VDB on the reverse? I have always heard ...1910 and 1911 that showed part of the VDB >>

    I've never heard that one before. I have heard one of the '09 VDB reverse dies had the letters filed off though.
  • Options
    LeeGLeeG Posts: 12,162
    Nice grab. Looks MS to me. Is that a rim bruise on the upper right reverse?
  • Options
    WaterSportWaterSport Posts: 7,034 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Drop it in acetone for a few mins. and then report back...I think you will be surprised.

    WS
    Proud recipient of the coveted PCGS Forum "You Suck" Award Thursday July 19, 2007 11:33 PM and December 30th, 2011 at 8:50 PM.
  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,170 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A solid and attractive AU58. Nice find.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,094 ✭✭✭
    This coin is way better than VF!!!! I wold guess XF/AU (45/50) you got yourself a nice lincoln there!

    image

    image
  • Options
    OneCentOneCent Posts: 3,561


    << <i>
    Is that a rim bruise on the upper right reverse? >>




    Yes, it isimage.





    << <i>Drop it in acetone for a few mins. and then report back...I think you will be surprised. >>



    I know what you are thinking and I thought the same thing. Soaking in acetone as we speak. Will re-image this afternoon.



    Overall, I think that we can almost universally conclude that this coin is way north of the VF that it was sold as. Somewhere between XF45 - and MS63. Not a high dollar coin, but definitely a "fun" coin and purchased for the price of a gallon of milk. The real story here is that I spent 1 hour looking though coins and was able to use the knowledge that I have gained over the past several years to identify a coin that clearly was not given much attention. I doubt the shop owner really cares because they likely paid even less than what I did. I also purchased a 1933-D in what they graded as XF, my opinion is more like VF-35 but the price was right so I bought that too. ALso did a "courtesy" buy of a 1976 clad proof set that was a little overpriced but the set is nice with potential dcam's.

    Moral of the story, even though prices in my desired series have skyrocketed (MS Lincoln's are really my bag) and I have chosen to become more of a sideline player for a while (we'll see how long this lasts), I still had a boatload of fun, acquired some nice coins and got my coin fix all for very little cost. In my book it was a good day. image





    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    62BN for sure... could be higher, in hand. Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    coindudeonebaycoindudeonebay Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭
    Any more pix after the acetone soak? Also, what about the possible VDB on the reverse? Someone posted that they heard of possible 09 reverses used in future issues, I've heard the same yet I've also heard there were partial VDB's and yours looks to have a partial VDB there, but then again, you have it in hand.
  • Options
    savoyspecialsavoyspecial Posts: 7,360 ✭✭✭✭
    looks upper-end AU and nice from here

    greg

    www.brunkauctions.com

  • Options
    SUMORADASUMORADA Posts: 4,797
  • Options
    BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,961 ✭✭✭
    Can't really tell, I'll guess AU55 from the pics.
  • Options
    coindudeonebaycoindudeonebay Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭


    << <i>image

    image
    image >>


    My point exactly... thanks for the pic help there!
  • Options
    dizzyfoxxdizzyfoxx Posts: 9,823 ✭✭✭
    Very attractive Lincoln.image
    image...There's always time for coin collecting. image
  • Options
    JcarneyJcarney Posts: 3,154


    << <i>Drop it in acetone for a few mins. and then report back...I think you will be surprised.

    WS >>



    You thinking Deller's darkener?
    “When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.” — Benjamin Franklin


    My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
  • Options
    OneCentOneCent Posts: 3,561
    Whelp folks, unfortunately the acetone bath revealed a serious problem with my cherrypick. Albeit not VF and still an AU/MS coin, it is not original eitherimage. It has been unquestionably cleaned (reverse absolutely stipped) and retoned - I did say in my original post that I could not rule this out. Should have bathed in acetone first, now I feel stupid. I thought that I had cherrypicked a nice piece here, but clearly not.

    Coindudeonebay - the VDB remnants on a 1910 or 1910-S have never been proven nor has there ever been any authenticated by a top TPG. It is likely a myth and more a figment of one's active imagination than anything real.


    Before Acetone:
    image

    AfterAcetone:
    image

    Before Acetone:
    image

    After Acetone (ughh, yuck):
    image


    Likely Deller's Darkener, not pretty. Acetone also appears to have revealed environmental damage on the reverse as well. Hard to believe that it is the same coin, especially the reverse.
    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • Options
    RedneckHBRedneckHB Posts: 20,155 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'll buy it from you if you dont like it.image
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,781 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would grade this coin at least MS-63, brown. I'd say that it more likely that it is MS-64, brown.

    Since I'm not a fan of red copper, I really like it.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    OneCentOneCent Posts: 3,561


    << <i>I'll buy it from you if you dont like it.image >>



    Did you see the after acetone picture?
    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • Options
    RedneckHBRedneckHB Posts: 20,155 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I'll buy it from you if you dont like it.image >>



    Did you see the after acetone picture? >>



    Yup.image

    PM sent.
    Excuses are tools of the ignorant

    Knowledge is the enemy of fear

  • Options
    It's troubling to me to see what happend to this coin after an acetone dip. I've never seen such a disappoinitng result. Was the bath overused and contaminated ???

    Garrow
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,012 ✭✭✭✭✭
    From RB to BG

    Reddish Brown to Brownish Green.
  • Options
    OneCentOneCent Posts: 3,561


    << <i>It's troubling to me to see what happend to this coin after an acetone dip. I've never seen such a disappoinitng result. Was the bath overused and contaminated ???

    Garrow >>



    Nope, fresh pure acetone. Never had any issues using acetone on copper in the past either. As I stated earlier, I suspect that the coin was re-colored using deller's darkner or some other product. The acetone simply stripped away the re-color job. Coin is shot and never was what it appeared to be.image
    imageimage
    Collector of Early 20th Century U.S. Coinage.
    ANA Member R-3147111
  • Options
    Well, if you paid VF money, you are still way ahead. I bought a 1915 graded AU for $19 years ago that now resides in a PCGS 64RB holder in my registry set.

    It's always fun to dig through the local B&M shop's material to see what turns up.

    Garrow

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file