POLL: STATE QUARTER COLLECTORS – ENTHUSIASM CHECK
Scioto
Posts: 955 ✭
I just got a P and D Nevada in change and wondered if others still have as much interest in collecting the series. Is the spark still there, has it become a chore or even a bore?
If you collect State Quarters are you as enthusiastic now as you were when you first started or has your enthusiasm waned?
If you collect State Quarters are you as enthusiastic now as you were when you first started or has your enthusiasm waned?
GO AHEAD! I DOUBLE-DOG DARE YOU TO RATE ME A 1!
0
Comments
Would not be collecting the quarters otherwise if they where not state quarters.....
State Quarters was the spark that got me into coin collecting however so.....
MS & Proofs + album with the same.
I think it has been a great program, it's fun, has pulled a lot of people into the hobby (both good and bad)
It gives me something rather inexpensive to look forward to on a regular basis.
I find this pursuit to be fun, and it is a nice balance to my other collecting habits of building world-class Registry sets and the like.
One thing though, I still prefer classical designs in most cases. I like many of the state quarter reverses, but I hate the debased alloy in which today's coins are struck, the inadequate detailing and relief on some issues, and the artistic and technical laziness inherent in many of the glib designs. While looking through pocket change, and seeing the new jefferson nickels, I am reminded of the old saying, "They don't make 'em like they used to." Some issues lack a sense of proportion, and have unduly small devices lost in large open fields. A comparison of the traditional "Buffalo" nickel reverse with the Kansas quarter reverse illustrates this point.
Sunnywood
Sunnywood's Rainbow-Toned Morgans (Retired)
Sunnywood's Barber Quarters (Retired)
I have never been a huge state quarter fan. I enjoy them to the extent that I collect the Proof sets every year, both clad and silver, but beyond that I don’t do anything with them. I don’t have a set of Washington quarters. During 45+ years as a collector, the Washington quarter is the ONLY modern issue that I have never collected. The reason is that I never found the coin attractive.
Some of the state quarters are attractive IMO, and I think that this year’s designs might be the best group so far. Still I’m not “ga-ga” over state quarters, but I am looking forward to adding to my stack of state quarter Proof sets.
coins is their ability to circulate and draw attention to the coins in circulation. The de-
signs are about what I expected and might be just a little better except for the num-
erous state outlines. Mintages are significantly higher. It looks like the lowest annual
production will be over two billion coins which is double the replacement rate for the
eagle reverse's attrition. It's getting to the point that it's a rarity to see a nice AU
eagle reverse coin.
It's fun to watch these coins mix in with the quarters already in circulation and begin
wearing out. There are already about 40% of circulating quarters and it's still climb-
ing. By the end of the program there will be 100 different of them and at least nine
or ten varieties to watch for.
Perhaps equally exciting is contemplating the new quarter at the end of the program.
Will it be an entirely new coin to begin the process of getting Liberty back on the coins
or just a rehashing of the same old design?
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
Actually, my oldest has taken an interest and has really kept the couple of books we have going. Although, I still look through all the change I get to see if it fills any holes we have or upgrades any of the existing ones we have. Normally the P's we get are in a poorer condition then the D's.
I don't think I was every enthusiastic about them, but I still am building my PCGS Registry Proof set
PLUS I put all the ones I find in circulation in my ceramic Monkey bank
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
I specialize in Wisconsin currency! Looking for information on WI national banknotes. Census stands at 12,318 notes.
**"Wisconsin National Bank Notes - 2nd Edition" is out!!!" Only $20PPd!!!
<< <i>Don't collect shiny disks at all. >>
Don't tell me you buy the colorized after-market ones.
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
When the Satins come out will be looking for them in MS68+ for my Washington complete set.
Please check out my sets below.
Syl's MS66 State Quarters
Syl's Washingtons. - 3rd Finest Set of All Time
In addition I also have all the mint and proof sets for those years. But I sold my PCGS registery set of Quarters.
So I guess I am still a enthusist.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
I kind of feel sorry for people paying tens of dollars for an expensive paper grading opinion and plastic holder for modern coins with mintages that run in the hundreds of millions; I think these coins will be commonly available forever and think resale values will be way down in a few years.
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
<< <i>I look foreward to the end of the series soon >>
I agree...I can't wait either...its been a long ride and the end is near.
My first post...updated with pics
I collect mostly moderns and I'm currently working on a US type set.
<< <i>I kind of enjoy finding a nice enough one at face value and pushing it into my album with my thumbs.
I kind of feel sorry for people paying tens of dollars for an expensive paper grading opinion and plastic holder for modern coins with mintages that run in the hundreds of millions; I think these coins will be commonly available forever and think resale values will be way down in a few years. >>
If it's nice enough for you and it's OK to push them into a board then more power to you. At $2.50
per year it won't break you and you don't have to worry about losing a lot of money even if the dollar
crashes and civilization comes to an end.
But you might consider that even with the dramatic increase in silver prices that it still cost far more
to grade a bust half or even a bust dollar than the value of the metal in the coin. I'd bet that if coin
values tank you'd lose far more than just the value of the grading and the metal.
<< <i> I kind of enjoy finding a nice enough one at face value and pushing it into my album with my thumbs.
>>
There's just something about the look and feel of the SQ's in a folder or album that I like. My daughter's P and D Dansco album is starting to feel the way a coin album should - heavy.
Has Nebraska been released to the banks yet?
<< <i>
<< <i> I kind of enjoy finding a nice enough one at face value and pushing it into my album with my thumbs.
>>
There's just something about the look and feel of the SQ's in a folder or album that I like. My daughter's P and D Dansco album is starting to feel the way a coin album should - heavy.
Has Nebraska been released to the banks yet? >>
I have a set of these in blue Whitman folders as well. All of them are the finest
example I can find in circulation. Since I'm in Indiana both mints appear here as
nice uncs and the collection is complete with most of the coins a mice MS-63 or 64.
There are a few gems and some of the early issues are only MS-61 or 62. I've found
none of the varieties yet. The coins are carefully put in the folders even though they
are unlikely to have much value in the foreseeable future.
I also keep a close eye on pocket change and will try to chase gems back to the
source if I see them. So far the only gems I've seen have been untraceable. This
may be because so many banks are releasing small numbers of coins. By the time
you get there they're gone anyway. These may require a whole new strategy of
just looking at huge numbers of coins.
Whatever it takes to find them, more power to the searchers and collectors of these
coins. It's always a lot of fun and it can be very profitable if you're the only one to
find or have one of the rare issues.
you get there they're gone anyway. These may require a whole new strategy of
just looking at huge numbers of coins.">>
I still collect them but not seriously. As they come out here I can get the D minted coins by the wagonload. I'm just thankful that I didn't make any more long term trading commitments than I already have.
I confess
As new states were added, and new quarters released, there seems to be less of a special quality about them.
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
<< <i>I find the later SHQs less interesting since the Mint started selecting the designs. I find the earlier SHQ designs that were selected by the states through voting and lobbying to have a much more interesting history. I like the story behind the design >>
Interesting. The latest quarter is the Montana quarter and I voted for the design (not the winning one, but it was a public vote that determined the winning design).
<< <i>
<< <i>I find the later SHQs less interesting since the Mint started selecting the designs. I find the earlier SHQ designs that were selected by the states through voting and lobbying to have a much more interesting history. I like the story behind the design >>
Interesting. The latest quarter is the Montana quarter and I voted for the design (not the winning one, but it was a public vote that determined the winning design). >>
That would be cool if I'm wrong. I'm actually just going by an article I read a while back.
<< <i>That would be cool if I'm wrong. I'm actually just going by an article I read a while back. >>
The states used to submit the actual design and the mint would have
their artists render it in the most coinable form while trying to stay true
to the submitted drawing.
Now the states simply submit the desired design in words and the mint
draws it.
There's likely not a lot of difference in practice.
<< <i>
<< <i>That would be cool if I'm wrong. I'm actually just going by an article I read a while back. >>
The states used to submit the actual design and the mint would have
their artists render it in the most coinable form while trying to stay true
to the submitted drawing.
Now the states simply submit the desired design in words and the mint
draws it.
There's likely not a lot of difference in practice. >>
That difference is actually very important to me because part of what I love about the SHQs is the process and history of people choosing designs, governors approving and submitting designs and the interaction between the governors and the Mint. The history is just a lot richer than a submission of words.
It's all about the history and story right? Just my 2 cents.