Home U.S. Coin Forum

GOING FOR THE GOLD. UPDATE CAC RESULTS REVEALED. GTG NEWP 1944 Lincoln Cent

WalkerloverWalkerlover Posts: 952 ✭✭✭✭
edited July 10, 2023 1:55PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Just purchased today would appreciate your feedback. Thanks

«13

Comments

  • Eighteen63Eighteen63 Posts: 128 ✭✭✭✭

    MS64

    On the contrary, Google is not your friend.

  • 1madman1madman Posts: 1,515 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65red

  • MWallaceMWallace Posts: 4,205 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,589 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • GreenstangGreenstang Posts: 1,214 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66R

  • jfriedm56jfriedm56 Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66+Red

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,358 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66RD

  • VTchaserVTchaser Posts: 309 ✭✭✭

    Beautiful

    Successful transactions with: robkool, Walkerguy21D, JimW, Bruce7789, massscrew, Jinx86, jonasdenenbergllc, Yorkshireman, bobsr, tommyrusty7, markelman1125, Kliao, DBSTrader2, SurfinxHI, ChrisH821, CoinHoarder, Bolo, MICHAELDIXON, bigtime36, JWP, 1960NYGiants, fishteeth

  • Riley1955Riley1955 Posts: 136 ✭✭✭

    65rd

  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65RD

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • bagofnickelsbagofnickels Posts: 349 ✭✭✭✭

    I'm at 65rd.

  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,315 ✭✭✭✭✭

    like!

    66 RD for me

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 8,876 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66+

  • erscoloerscolo Posts: 609 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66 RD

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66RD.

    Coin Photographer.

  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,506 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It appears to have terrific color and luster. The images are a little overexposed, in my opinion, for me to give an grade estimate, but it has the feel of something in the MS65/66 neighborhood.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,180 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS67 RED

    peacockcoins

  • ldhairldhair Posts: 7,262 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm at 67. It has the luster.

    Larry

  • maymay Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66rd

    Type collector, mainly into Seated. -formerly Ownerofawheatiehorde. Good BST transactions with: mirabela, OKCC, MICHAELDIXON, Gerard

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,532 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66+, if it was an older holder it would be 65.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • RelaxnRelaxn Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    5+ red
    44's come gorgeous as there are BU rolls out there still. Looks nice.

  • hbarbeehbarbee Posts: 193 ✭✭✭

    I don't think it would be over a 66RD. The surface preservation, luster and eye appeal would warrant more, but the strike is not good on Lincoln's hair and the upper part of the reverse.

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,594 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65RD.

  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,900 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67RD

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,901 ✭✭✭✭✭

    In my opinion, any guesses below MS66 are harsh. I’d be shocked if the coin doesn’t grade 66 at a minimum and 67 wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,594 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would like to see a better strike.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 8,876 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would like to see a 67+ that luster is pretty sick .

  • HillbillyCollectorHillbillyCollector Posts: 640 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66-67-RD
    Don’t know much about copper, but I do know what ‘crazy’ luster and clean fields look like!
    Beautiful, and congrats!👍

  • WalkerloverWalkerlover Posts: 952 ✭✭✭✭

    @HillbillyCollector said:
    66-67-RD
    Don’t know much about copper, but I do know what ‘crazy’ luster and clean fields look like!
    Beautiful, and congrats!👍

    Thank you I thought the luster was incredible but I have not seen the coin in hand. It was mailed out today

  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What @ricko says.

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • Tom147Tom147 Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66 red

  • Bigbuck1975Bigbuck1975 Posts: 1,270 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Blazer 66 min

  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,397 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Terrific looking coin... I now have concerns because we are going to be surprised. Something tells me the image created a different narrative than what grade might be on the holder. I want to be wrong because in looking at the image, I see 66+ or 67. Could it 67+ and that is the surprise?

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • WaterSportWaterSport Posts: 6,838 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I Dunno - it's a late die state strike on both sides. In the "old" days it would not have got past 65. But these days - who knows.

    WS

    Proud recipient of the coveted PCGS Forum "You Suck" Award Thursday July 19, 2007 11:33 PM and December 30th, 2011 at 8:50 PM.
  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 8,876 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like your 64 better than my 64. And judging by the cert number it’s going to fall into the same era as mine which is, if it doesn’t look like a 70 then it’s not a 67. Good thing we collect coins and not labels I got a sharpie for that 🤣

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,901 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 23, 2023 6:40PM

    @Walkerlover said:

    @MFeld said:
    In my opinion, any guesses below MS66 are harsh. I’d be shocked if the coin doesn’t grade 66 at a minimum and 67 wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

    The Coin is MS 64 Red. I was impressed with the flash and color and surprised it was only graded MS 64 so I bought it all in for 20 bucks, hopefully it looks as good in hand.

    There’s likely an issue that’s not apparent in the images, as they don’t seem to show anything that merits such a low grade. The one possibility that I can come up with is multiple bad contact marks on the lower left portion of Lincoln’s bust. Please let us know what you see, once you have the coin in hand.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • HillbillyCollectorHillbillyCollector Posts: 640 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Walkerlover said:

    @MFeld said:
    In my opinion, any guesses below MS66 are harsh. I’d be shocked if the coin doesn’t grade 66 at a minimum and 67 wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

    The Coin is MS 64 Red. I was impressed with the flash and color and surprised it was only graded MS 64 so I bought it all in for 20 bucks, hopefully it looks as good in hand.

    Wow! That’s a GREAT looking 64. Would the weak strike have been what knocked a point or two off?
    At any rate, great looking coin!

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 8,876 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @Walkerlover said:

    @MFeld said:
    In my opinion, any guesses below MS66 are harsh. I’d be shocked if the coin doesn’t grade 66 at a minimum and 67 wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

    The Coin is MS 64 Red. I was impressed with the flash and color and surprised it was only graded MS 64 so I bought it all in for 20 bucks, hopefully it looks as good in hand.

    There’s likely an issue that’s not apparent in the images, as they don’t seem to show anything that merits such a low grade. The one possibility that I can come up with is multiple bad contact marks on the lower left portion of Lincoln’s bust. Please let us know what you see, once you have the coin in hand.

    And some very minute spotting which doesn’t seem to overide the eye appeal. At least in these images.

  • 1madman1madman Posts: 1,515 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @Walkerlover said:

    @MFeld said:
    In my opinion, any guesses below MS66 are harsh. I’d be shocked if the coin doesn’t grade 66 at a minimum and 67 wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

    The Coin is MS 64 Red. I was impressed with the flash and color and surprised it was only graded MS 64 so I bought it all in for 20 bucks, hopefully it looks as good in hand.

    There’s likely an issue that’s not apparent in the images, as they don’t seem to show anything that merits such a low grade. The one possibility that I can come up with is multiple bad contact marks on the lower left portion of Lincoln’s bust. Please let us know what you see, once you have the coin in hand.

    Only issues I see are the stain/darkness on the reverse over the letter “N” in one, hits on Lincoln’s bust (as you noted), significant hit in the field to the left of Lincoln’s bust/coat, and scrape line across Lincoln’s head (above his ear) almost like a brain surgery incision.

    Not the ugliest 64, imo

  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,900 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 23, 2023 6:55PM
  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Someone should start another thread. "Post Your Highest Grade Lincoln Cent"

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 6,410 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I got here too late to guess but I think the grade is accurate. The pictures do not accurately show the surface but you can tell there is a lot of chatter on Lincoln's shoulder and face and the rim is "chewy." But the luster sure does help.

  • WalkerloverWalkerlover Posts: 952 ✭✭✭✭

    @1madman said:

    @MFeld said:

    @Walkerlover said:

    @MFeld said:
    In my opinion, any guesses below MS66 are harsh. I’d be shocked if the coin doesn’t grade 66 at a minimum and 67 wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

    The Coin is MS 64 Red. I was impressed with the flash and color and surprised it was only graded MS 64 so I bought it all in for 20 bucks, hopefully it looks as good in hand.

    There’s likely an issue that’s not apparent in the images, as they don’t seem to show anything that merits such a low grade. The one possibility that I can come up with is multiple bad contact marks on the lower left portion of Lincoln’s bust. Please let us know what you see, once you have the coin in hand.

    Only issues I see are the stain/darkness on the reverse over the letter “N” in one, hits on Lincoln’s bust (as you noted), significant hit in the field to the left of Lincoln’s bust/coat, and scrape line across Lincoln’s head (above his ear) almost like a brain surgery incision.

    Not the ugliest 64, imo

    Not the “Ugliest”. These 2 coins also graded MS 64 came from the same seller, some of a few MS red coins possibly from an original roll. Compare!

  • WalkerloverWalkerlover Posts: 952 ✭✭✭✭
    edited June 23, 2023 9:35PM

    Funny that once the grade is posted all of a sudden everybody is finding all these flaws on the coin. What happened to all the smart people who were guessing 66 66+ even 67, 😂 lol. Seems they got cold feet all of a sudden. Can’t the coin just be undergraded. Will post more after I see the coin in hand. Thanks for your participation

  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,900 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Walkerlover said:
    Funny that once the grade is posted all of a sudden everybody is finding all these flaws on the coin. What happened to all the smart genius people who were guessing 66 66+ even 67, 😂 lol. Can’t the coin be very undergraded. Will post more after I see the coin in hand. Thanks for your participation

    I still think it's better then 64

  • 1madman1madman Posts: 1,515 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Walkerlover said:

    @1madman said:

    @MFeld said:

    @Walkerlover said:

    @MFeld said:
    In my opinion, any guesses below MS66 are harsh. I’d be shocked if the coin doesn’t grade 66 at a minimum and 67 wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

    The Coin is MS 64 Red. I was impressed with the flash and color and surprised it was only graded MS 64 so I bought it all in for 20 bucks, hopefully it looks as good in hand.

    There’s likely an issue that’s not apparent in the images, as they don’t seem to show anything that merits such a low grade. The one possibility that I can come up with is multiple bad contact marks on the lower left portion of Lincoln’s bust. Please let us know what you see, once you have the coin in hand.

    Only issues I see are the stain/darkness on the reverse over the letter “N” in one, hits on Lincoln’s bust (as you noted), significant hit in the field to the left of Lincoln’s bust/coat, and scrape line across Lincoln’s head (above his ear) almost like a brain surgery incision.

    Not the ugliest 64, imo

    Not the “Ugliest”. These 2 coins also graded MS 64 came from the same seller, some of a few MS red coins possibly from an original roll. Compare!

    The last coin you have a picture of is a Denver mint, so not an “original roll” in my definition, but it looks like you got the nicest of the 3. I personally like your coin as a 65 because of the flashy surfaces. I couldn’t help but look up a price guide value on the coin, $12. You really can’t “make” the coin for the $20 with slabbing shipping and fees, so I think you did good.

  • DropdaflagDropdaflag Posts: 809 ✭✭✭✭✭

    From the pictures, it looks as good as any 66 I ever owned.

  • WalkerloverWalkerlover Posts: 952 ✭✭✭✭

    @1madman said:

    @Walkerlover said:

    @1madman said:

    @MFeld said:

    @Walkerlover said:

    @MFeld said:
    In my opinion, any guesses below MS66 are harsh. I’d be shocked if the coin doesn’t grade 66 at a minimum and 67 wouldn’t surprise me in the least.

    The Coin is MS 64 Red. I was impressed with the flash and color and surprised it was only graded MS 64 so I bought it all in for 20 bucks, hopefully it looks as good in hand.

    There’s likely an issue that’s not apparent in the images, as they don’t seem to show anything that merits such a low grade. The one possibility that I can come up with is multiple bad contact marks on the lower left portion of Lincoln’s bust. Please let us know what you see, once you have the coin in hand.

    Only issues I see are the stain/darkness on the reverse over the letter “N” in one, hits on Lincoln’s bust (as you noted), significant hit in the field to the left of Lincoln’s bust/coat, and scrape line across Lincoln’s head (above his ear) almost like a brain surgery incision.

    Not the ugliest 64, imo

    Not the “Ugliest”. These 2 coins also graded MS 64 came from the same seller, some of a few MS red coins possibly from an original roll. Compare!

    The last coin you have a picture of is a Denver mint, so not an “original roll” in my definition, but it looks like you got the nicest of the 3. I personally like your coin as a 65 because of the flashy surfaces. I couldn’t help but look up a price guide value on the coin, $12. You really can’t “make” the coin for the $20 with slabbing shipping and fees, so I think you did good.

    Do you think 65 solid or plus?. BTW they also had this coin for sale as well.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file