Under, Over or Correct. $10 Gold Indian.
ironmanl63
Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭
In hand a very attractive piece with nice color. Hoping the photos can convey it on your computer screen. Fire away good or bad.
1926 MS64 CAC graded by NGC.
8
Comments
Love it! Looks close to or at 65 level. If you posted as a GTG, I would have said 65. Of course, we cannot see what is going on with the cheek and chin. Still, that is a clean coin with terrific color!
Tom
64 is right on, I couldn’t see this in a 65 holder and it’s not a 63. Rev is particularly nice
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
It looks like a very nice example with pleasing color. There are too many small marks on the face to consider going for a upgrade. For an MS-64, this is about as good as it gets.
Here’s my 64cac. I like my obverse better but your reverse is cleaner, I think yours is a strong 64.
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
I like it a lot!
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
A very upper-end 64.
Coinlearner, Ahrensdad, Nolawyer, RG, coinlieutenant, Yorkshireman, lordmarcovan, Soldi, masscrew, JimTyler, Relaxn, jclovescoins
Now listen boy, I'm tryin' to teach you sumthin' . . . . that ain't no optical illusion, it only looks like an optical illusion.
My mind reader refuses to charge me....
Very nice 64. I like the color. 1926 is underrated. Although a common date, less than 1/3rd as many 1926 CAC'd in 64 vs 1932. In 65 these get tough.
Instagram
Like it.. would be satisfied with a 64. Wouldn't suspect it would end up a 65 but who knows?? Never can be sure with pictures but I think it is better than 63.
Mark
I think NGC, CAC, and everyone here got it right.
It's a beauty!
I want !!
Stunning colour.
Very pretty coin. And your photos are nice also! Thanks for posting..
K
Very nice example!!
A lot of $10 Indians have surface abrasions. Yours looks rather clean and smooth!
MS 64+!!
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Great looking Indian and solid 64!
Thank you for the comments. To many little ticks on the obverse for a gem grade. I am very pleased with the originality and color. The reverse I might say is stunning!
The reverse is truly stunning! You are a very lucky owner of a beautiful Indian.
Nice luster, nice color, maybe a few too many micro luster breaks and minor scruffies to go Gem, but a nice 64 from what I can see.
Some of my friends and I have a saying when we see something the other has that we like, as way of a compliment,
"How much?"
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
It's nicer than a lot of 65s out there from those pics. I'd feel great buying that in a 64 holder the nick by the eye probably keeps it at a 64+ for me but really no other complaints great coin.
@ironmanl63 ... A very nice gold Eagle... deserving of the grade. Will not make a 65, but that reverse is really good. Cheers, RickO