Stumped the Panel - Grade Revealed - Genuine AU Details (98 - Damage)
ColonelKlinck
Posts: 375 ✭✭✭
Seems as if too much metal has been moved as determined by grader(s).
Some of you may remember this coin from a past post.
I just received grades on a recent submission in which the referenced coin was included. See how close you can get to the grade received!
0
Comments
AU58
Successful BST transactions with....Coinslave87, ChrisH821, Walkerguy21D, SanctionII.......................Received "You Suck" award 02/18/23
AU55, hard to tell if that’s wear or strike though.
If it’s just a weak strike, maybe 63
I'm BACK!!! Used to be Billet7 on the old forum.
AU50
Ya, I'm in the AU range also. These grades can be picky so not gonna guess the numerical side of it.
My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
https://n1m.com/bobbysmith1
50-53
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
Is it possible PCGS stated Cleaned, AU details?
peacockcoins
Appears AU Details from photo, definitely dipped, whether too much luster was removed hard to tell for sure from photo.
AU details.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
45.
AU53.
AU55 is my initial thought but I'm still learning on Morgans. I know the "O" mint coins typically have soft strikes, lacking hair details above Liberty's ear, and lacking breast feathers on the eagle.
Dwayne F. Sessom
Ebay ID: V-Nickel-Coins
55
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
Genuine XF
bob
My opinion is the same as before, AU details, however, I grade strictly and it would not be the first time that a TPG would not agree with my grade.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
I think Au53
AU details, jmo.
It looks a little shiny (cleaned).
Still pretty nice.
AU50 details.
AU-50 cleaned, likely does not have a details designation.
"But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you" Matthew 6:33. Young fellow suffering from Bust Half fever.
BHNC #AN-10
JRCS #1606
45, or possibly Cleaned - XF Details.
Was also thinking AU details cleaned, especially at NGC. Think of the original luster that would be present, the more details without luster the more likely that it gets a details grade.
I once had a really nice full set of Morgan Dollars, except for the 95 proof. The only coin that I was missing in original XF or better was the 95-O. To me, it was the most difficult coin to find in nice original condition.
Your coin is attractive, but I think it is graded AU Details, cleaned. When it comes to details coins, my view is that pcgs does not seem to care much about the underlying grade, so it is possible that it is XF details, cleaned.
Tom
XF. I cant tell from the picture for certain, but it would not surprise me if they detailed it as cleaned.
XF45
Most of the time if there is light wear, the area will show some light discoloration. Probably has been cleaned.
AU-50 Cleaned.. Nice, scarce coin regardless.
Pete
AU details, cleaned
"You can't get just one gun." "You can't get just one tattoo." "You can't get just one 1796 Draped Bust Large Cent."
.
"You can't get just one gun." "You can't get just one tattoo." "You can't get just one 1796 Draped Bust Large Cent."
I would say it's a 50
53
If it straight graded, AU 50 tops. Pictures make it look lightly cleaned.
First thought was 55 but after looking closer, 53 seems more appropriate.
https://www.the4thcoin.com
https://www.ebay.com/str/thefourthcoin
AU details
xf details, cleaned
Au cleaned, or au53 straight. They might be generous.
EF Details, Cleaned
or
EF45 to AU50 if it got straight
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
XF details, altered surfaces.
AU deets... looks like I'm not the only one who's seeing that from these pics.
If it's not details graded and the coin looks different than images provided, consider getting better pics done?
I'm around AU50, possibly cleaned.
Bird has no breast feathers at all. 45, maybe 50.
AU50
53
My first impression was that it did not straight grade. I also learned from reading a previous post that this one is difficult to find in original condition, that being as it is, I still think it got a details grade for cleaning.
Details.
Indian Head $10 Gold Date Set Album
I would call it AU50.... Likely dipped.... cannot determine what luster may be there from the pictures. Cheers, RickO
I’m thinking AU 53 and even though it appears lightly cleaned, I’m guessing there may have been some generosity in this semi-key issue. Nice coin!
Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014
I’m going with cleaned. I see what appear to be hairlines.
I wonder when we will get the answer?
My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
https://n1m.com/bobbysmith1
Cleaning did not occur to me until someone mentioned.
Did they fail to state details on the slab?
My shot in the dark was AU 55, too high.
Edit: typo
AU 50 details, cleaned. And inquiring minds want to know….
I’d call it AU details. If it weren’t a problem coin, I’d call it a weak AU50.
45 was my first impression
Mr_Spud