Which would you rather have? Both are CAC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7cbd/d7cbdd9c991ebe6baa91451d842cd9282c0a5b66" alt="DisneyFan"
These are 1910-D Barber dimes. According to Jeff Ambio's "Barber Dime" book, the 1910-D is one of the most consistently unattractive issues in the entire Barber dime series. : ) Ignore the price of either.
Which would you rather have? Both are CAC
This is a public poll: others will see what you voted for.
0
Comments
My vote is based strictly upon the eye appeal of the obverse images only and I fully understand that the images were taken by different folks using different equipment and techniques. The MS64 appears to me to have better luster on the obverse and the MS65 might have more muted surfaces. Again, this is simply my interpretation of the incredibly limited information.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Based on the images, I voted for the 64, but the Trueview of the 65 looks better than the OP photo of it. If I saw both coins in-hand, my answer might be different.
+1 for everything Tom said. Pictures are not good enough to really dissect the coins but from those images I like the 64 better
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
Based on what I can see from here, the MS64. I don't know what I'd choose if I had the coins in hand.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Ditto.
I know I'm in the minority but I like the look of the 65.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I insist upon seeng the reverses and knowing the price for each coin, before making my selection.
On the other hand, if you’re goi going to give me the one of my choice, I’ll take the MS65, as I could sell it for a higher price, if I didn’t want to keep it.😉
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I voted the 64, but would love to see the TV.
Looking at the TV, the toning on the MS65 is not terrible but not appealing either.
BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out
I’ll break the rules. Sell both and buy a nicer, eye appealing version.
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
The 65 has more of an 'original' look to my eyes. Both are quite nice.
Dave
I'll take the 65 I don't think the photos tell the whole story and the CAC should carry the weight.
64 looks better to me also.
My Original Song Written to my late wife-"Plus other original music by me"
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8A11CC8CC6093D80
https://n1m.com/bobbysmith1
Don’t care for the 5 but I would sell it.
I went with the 65 for 3 reasons. One is that both images are blurry and with different lighting so I can’t accurately judge the eye appeal. The 2nd is that the 65 has a higher grade. The 3rd reason is that I prefer darker skin on barber dimes since so many of them that I’ve seen were obviously cleaned.
Mr_Spud
Neither are what I would consider show stoppers. Based on appearance the 64 is nicer. The 65 just doesn’t do it for me.
My current registry sets:
20th Century Type Set
Virtual DANSCO 7070
Slabbed IHC set - Missing the Anacs Slabbed coins
It’s crazy the number of high grade coins I see, including gold, that I consider junk/melt from an eye appeal basis.
I suspect the MS65 looks much better in-hand than the photo would suggest.
Interesting comments; especially, from those who would pick the MS65 and immediately sell it. : )
Here are the statistics from CAC - 1in MS64 @ $858 8 in MS65 @ $2,100 2 in MS66 @ $2,620
Both coins have TrueViews which are actually quite different from the photos above.
All of these pictures show how difficult it is to buy coins without being able to see them in hand.
Personally, I'd try to find one of the two MS66s. : )
Where is the cert # and barcode on the first slab?
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled
Sorry - it's on the reverse - CERT #35373217
Do you have any idea why it's on the reverse? I haven't seen anything like it before.
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled
After pulling at the TV for the 65, it looks exactly how I expected it to look based on the first photo. Can we have the other cert #?
Edit : never mind, I see that I was late
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
Custom "vanity" label : )
Dang, I hit the wrong one by mistake. I like the 64.
I just looked at the TV for the 64. I still like it better than the 65.
Based on the TrueViews of each, and not the photos in the OP, I'd take the 65.
Just based off the photos in the OP, I'd probably have chosen the 64.
I would need to see the reverses and know the price for each coin, before making an informed selection.
I like the 64. The luster is less affected by the toning than it is on the 65. It just has more eye appeal, to my way of thinking.
The TVs and the statistics from CAC are a start - 1in MS64 @ $858 - 8 in MS65 @ $2,100 - 2 in MS66 @ $2,620
Just based on the OP question and pictures, I will take the 64. Now, in hand, other considerations, could change that, as some have mentioned above. Cheers, RickO