More Homemade Albums

The_Dinosaur_Man

I've been at it again. New books include Half Dimes, Bust Dimes, and Indian Head Eagles.

The half dime album I populated with my own collection, rehoused from a Dansco.

More photos will be posted later. I'm happy with the results.

Davideo

Awesome. They are like the old Library of Coins albums.

Type2

Very cool.

ernie11

They remind me of the old Coins and Currency deluxe albums I have for my Barber Halves.

1630Boston

Very nice @The_Dinosaur_Man

Mr_Spud

Very cool 👍🏻

291fifth

Library of Coins Albums ceased operations about 1982. I always liked them. Your albums will appeal to Library of Coins fans. Do you plan on marketing them or are they just for your purposes? (They look great!)

yosclimber

Looks like fun. (What is that 187x half dime in the 1830 slot? ).

If you'd like some critique on the half dime set composition:

• 1837 large date (seated) before 1837 small date (seated). The large date punch was carried over from the 1837 bust.
• 1849 9/6 -> 9 / Far 6

• 1849 9/8 -> 9 / Near 6 (9/8 is from old Red Books and has been disproven)
  https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1023621/the-revised-1849-6-half-dime-varieties-9-16-update/p1

• 1861 1/0 I would leave this out, because it is not a true overdate. It is a part of the date punch, which is
  pressed a little more deeply on some of the dies.

I am glad to see you left out the 1838 "small stars", which has been a source of confusion.

In place of the 1861, you could use a mint mark size variety.
A good one is the 1872-s micro s, as it is only R-3.
The 1850-o small o is another good one, which is somewhat available, even though none are known in mint state.
Another option could be the 1872 DDO (V-6), which is not rare.
Check out this "Top 100" thread for alternative varieties:
https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1035720/top-100-seated-half-dime-varieties-list-and-112-page-pdf

fishteeth

Very cool. I always wanted to have someone build a type set album that went by era instead of denominations
would be so cool to have an album where all the draped bust were together, then the capped etc.

braddick

If one was made as a type set album (with some of the missing coins DANSCO 7070 neglects to include) I'd be a buyer at $100.
I'd think there would be many like me that would love to house their type set(s) in such a classy and quality appearing album.

pmh1nic

Very nice job.

duck620

Really nice coin books awesome.

ricko

Excellent work... Very appealing in appearance and content. I do think you could have a bit of a business there if you so choose. Cheers, RickO

The_Dinosaur_Man

Thanks for the comments everyone! I'll get around to posting the interiors of the other books in a bit. I would absolutely love to sell these books and will certainly entertain private inquiries for the moment! Just know that they are homemade and assembled by hand. Anyone that's familiar with some of the shows in New England will find me browsing the tables or even set up with a few of the books with me.

@291fifth said:
Library of Coins Albums ceased operations about 1982. I always liked them. Your albums will appeal to Library of Coins fans. Do you plan on marketing them or are they just for your purposes? (They look great!)

I definitely plan on marketing them in some form! I've met enough collectors that have wanted specialized books in some form and would like to cater to them. I've begun setting up a website where such ordering will be possible.

@yosclimber said:
Looks like fun. (What is that 187x half dime in the 1830 slot? ).

If you'd like some critique on the half dime set composition:

• 1837 large date (seated) before 1837 small date (seated). The large date punch was carried over from the 1837 bust.
• 1849 9/6 -> 9 / Far 6

• 1849 9/8 -> 9 / Near 6 (9/8 is from old Red Books and has been disproven)
  https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1023621/the-revised-1849-6-half-dime-varieties-9-16-update/p1

• 1861 1/0 I would leave this out, because it is not a true overdate. It is a part of the date punch, which is
  pressed a little more deeply on some of the dies.

I am glad to see you left out the 1838 "small stars", which has been a source of confusion.

In place of the 1861, you could use a mint mark size variety.
A good one is the 1872-s micro s, as it is only R-3.
The 1850-o small o is another good one, which is somewhat available, even though none are known in mint state.
Another option could be the 1872 DDO (V-6), which is not rare.
Check out this "Top 100" thread for alternative varieties:
https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1035720/top-100-seated-half-dime-varieties-list-and-112-page-pdf

I like this. The beauty of doing a custom book is being able to choose which coins to pursue, how to label them, etc. When I get my website going, collectors will be able to choose what specific coins they want to put into their album, varieties included or not.

@fishteeth said:
Very cool. I always wanted to have someone build a type set album that went by era instead of denominations
would be so cool to have an album where all the draped bust were together, then the capped etc.

You might be interested in another project I have been setting up which will cater towards your idea. For the last few years, I've been assembling a listing of the Mint's output year by year starting with 1793 and running up to the present, and photographing the various date/mintmark combos along the way. This will be a part of my website and collectors will be able to order books dedicated to specific years.

@braddick said:
If one was made as a type set album (with some of the missing coins DANSCO 7070 neglects to include) I'd be a buyer at $100.
I'd think there would be many like me that would love to house their type set(s) in such a classy and quality appearing album.

I agree! Dansco, Whitman, and several of the other manufacturers have made curious and sometimes critical omissions in their books. One such omission that always bothered me was on "complete" books that, for example, were Washington Quarters, 1932-1998 with Proofs, and the first slot for a Proof coin was dated 1968-S when in reality there should be Proof slots going back to 1936. Lincoln Cents might be an even worse example since most of the Wheat cent proofs cost less than the 09-S V.D.B. and in most of the books I've seen the proofs don't start until 1975.

jesbroken

I like them. You do great work. They appear similar to my old Wayte Raymond Cents Albums, Indian and Lincoln. Although mine are horizontal rather than vertical. I also have a similar Meghrig album for later Lincoln, again a horizontal album.
Jim

braddick

"Dansco, Whitman, and several of the other manufacturers have made curious and sometimes critical omissions in their books. One such omission that always bothered me was on "complete" books that, for example, were Washington Quarters, 1932-1998 with Proofs, and the first slot for a Proof coin was dated 1968-S when in reality there should be Proof slots going back to 1936. Lincoln Cents might be an even worse example since most of the Wheat cent proofs cost less than the 09-S V.D.B., and in most of the books I've seen, the proofs don't start until 1975."

This curious error also infiltrates the Jefferson series.

WAYNEAS

You do amazing work.
Wayne