Have you ever seen a pedigree like on this SEGS slab?
davewesen
Posts: 6,410 ✭✭✭✭✭
Looking at auction and blew up picture tp see what all the small print was ....
12
davewesen
Posts: 6,410 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
Can't remember ever seeing one company referencing another. Would have thought that would be frowned upon. Not sure why someone would cross it into SEGS, but to each their own.
That PCGS Cert is still valid: https://www.pcgs.com/cert/06198934
Wonder if you cracked it and sent the SEGS label in, if you get the 50-Cents credit lol.
"You Suck Award" - February, 2015
Discoverer of 1919 Mercury Dime DDO - FS-101
No.
That is really weird. It may have been requested by whoever crossed it over to SEGS. Not sure why they would do it though.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
That one is new to me.
I haven't seen one TPG referencing another but I don't think there's anything wrong with it. Coins get moved around and it's nice to track them.
Larry used to put more detailed info on his slabs that anyone else I know.
I think it’s neat….I like it.
.
CoinsAreFun Toned Silver Eagle Proof Album
.
Gallery Mint Museum, Ron Landis& Joe Rust, The beginnings of the Golden Dollar
.
More CoinsAreFun Pictorials NGC
I think it’s great to keep reminding the submitter how foolish he is/was.
Paying money to make your coin worth even less… Priceless.
If properly marketed to slab collectors, I wouldn't be surprised if it sold for more this way compared to when it was in a PCGS holder (given that the value for a 1963 PR 66 Franklin isn't that high to begin with). I agree it is silly overall to do something like this but I also find it somewhat amusing (from a distance of course as I don't plan to try it out myself).
It’s probably the only coin which has ever been sent in for PCGS to SEGS crossover
Latin American Collection
At least it didn't say "Ex: PCGS 06704.66/1088934"
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
it closed near $50, and at least I got the picture.
The new CAC gig!
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
That's a first here
New one on me.
Seems counterintuitive.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I have not seen that before....not sure why one would cross to SEGS unless for slab uniformity in their collection. Then keep the traceability for the grade confirmation. Cheers, RickO
There are some who contend that the SEGS slab was the best one ever made.
That may have been a factor.
Maybe the submitter was hoping for a higher grade.......
LOL.
And if it was SEGS 65 or 67 with that pedigree what would we say?
I agree-it was the best slab ever made except for the fact it wasn't very airtight.
"Like a virgin."
Never saw this before.
Wayne
Kennedys are my quest...
Strange.
likely cracked out of the PCGS slab and resubmitted for an upgrade. Likely received an unexpected lower grade leaving the owner with a heartbreaking choice. The fact that it used to be a PCGS 66 tells me it is no longer a PCGS 66. The SEGs label is simply an attempt to overrate the coin.
Repetition of ignorance is ignorance raised to the power two.
that is strange
BHNC #203
ICCS out of Toronto references PCGS on a lot of their holders.
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
And Accugrade took several ICCS flips and encapsulated the coin and label from them in an ACG PhotoCert style slab. Without as I've been able to determine, knowledge of ICCS
ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")
never seen that before interesting
Aug 11th