1921 SLQ GTG ****GRADE POSTED****

Guess the grade
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
6
Guess the grade
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
Comments
65
66.
I don't see anything limiting this coin from 66+ and perhaps 67. Beauty. Thanks for sharing.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
I like it, I'll go 66
Collector, occasional seller
It is a gorgeous coin, that's for sure.
I will say 67 FH
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
Yeah she's hammered 67 fh
"That's why I wander and follow La Vie Dansante"
Looks like a 65/66... SLQ's were always a bit of a problem for me grading....guess it just seems such a busy design (obverse) Cheers, RickO
Very nice! I will go 67 FH
66FH, maybe better. Very nice coin.
66
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
Wonderfully struck! I agree with 66FH... or better...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
I love the look but I'm not sure if the luster is booming. I'll say MS64.
Beautiful coin, I’ll try 66+
66
I've seen too many of this design designated "full head" that weren't, so I'm not gonna hazard a guess on that.
Not sure about the FH... but I am trying look for reasons to limit the grade without much luck. What a terrific coin. I would hope 66 is the floor with a 50% shot at 67. The photo is exceptional and makes the case for a significant grade.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Gorgeous, hammered, great date SLQ!! Congratulations!!
66 or 66+ ... as for FH, I would suspect they gave it a FH designation. Maybe more importantly, awesome strike overall with nearly full chainmail, shield and rivets ... and she has a knee!
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
MS66+FH - if that reverse scratch is on the holder then maybe even 67+
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"
65
66
Dave
MS64 FH
My YouTube Channel
MS-66, Full Head.
Gorgeous example of a tough date slq….
66FH to me.
64 not a full head
Graded Wow! Looks 66+
100% Positive BST transactions
Nope, that hit on the left leg (facing the coin) will keep it down, or it should.
64 in my opinion, not full head.
BHNC #203
66FH, unless there are hairlines not apparent in the photo.
66FH
66+ FH
65+
Successful BST with drddm, BustDMs, Pnies20, lkeigwin, pursuitofliberty, Bullsitter, felinfoel, SPalladino
$5 Type Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/u-s-coins/type-sets/half-eagle-type-set-circulation-strikes-1795-1929/album/344192
CBH Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/everyman-collections/everyman-half-dollars/everyman-capped-bust-half-dollars-1807-1839/album/345572
Agreed.
Two dies developed cracks during use, the pictures follow.
Pete
ms64
65 but not full head even if designated as such. While many call it well struck it strikes me as being a bit on the soft side, hence not a 66 by my standards.
Wow! Just noticed the MD on IN GOD WE TRUST almost makes it look 3d. That is kind of special. The toning prevented me from making a judgement regarding the FH designation, but it may well be. What a gorgeous example of a T2 SLQ. Congratulations and thank you for sharing.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
66+ FH
Okay, it's been 24 hours....Time to post the grade.
Believe it or not, it is 'only' a PCGS MS 64 with no FH designation.
I saw this coin on a dealer's website, about a week a ago, and I never really got it out of my head.
After researching the price over the last 10 years, I determined that it was a great deal, especially with such a strong strike, so I went back and purchased it.
According to PCGS CoinFacts, in 2011, it was worth 25% more than it is today and it peaked out at 40% higher in 2013. It is currently at a 10 year low and I only paid about 5% over the current PCGS market price. Given the historic price data and the condition of the coin, I felt that this was an outstanding deal.
All shield rivets are full, full date, and the head looks pretty darned GOOD....I see an earhole, full facial features and decent hair detail. I have seen slightly fuller heads but not much.
I buy FHs, when I can get them, but I like to cherry pick the nice examples, when the difference in price of FHs versus non-FHs is THOUSANDS of $$$.
I am more than happy with this piece. Thank you all for the great comments and thanks for playing!
P.S. I am now 71% complete on my SLQ Date Set and only need four more coins!!
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
The lack of full head detail doesn't surprise me-I don't personally think it has one. The low numeric grade is a surprise. They were pretty rough with the grade on that one.
You're actually correct. Now, that I have it in hand; I can see (with a loupe) a touch of flatness, on the very highest point, but I'd say that the head is still about 90% full.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Maybe time to send that little baby back in for a reconsideration. But I will say after looking at coin facts on these particular coins I found that they are very hard on them. In fact their 64 looks much like yours. At the same time the higher grades of 66 and 67 definitely show more Luster and is evident even in the pics.
Anyway regardless of the number I would definitely buy that coin.
Edit, I meant photo grade not CoinFacts. CoinFacts actually has yours pictured :-)
That would be enough for me. I think a full head quarter without a corresponding full shield is nothing special. You have a nice full shield on your '21. It's a truly outstanding coin and one that I'd be proud to own.
This is the best I can do for a '21-VF30. I have a complete date set, excepting, of course the 1916.

I might just do that, someday. The luster on mine looks better in hand and I love the hint of coppery-gold toning on it.
I had no idea that mine was in CoinFacts. That's cool. I'll have to check it out!!
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
It’s not on the top three though you have to click on view more images.
Thank you. I agree with you regarding the shield.
You have a very nice example, as well.
It has a nice, original, silver-grey color and a lot of meat for a VF.
I am doing my set ATS and they have a slot for a T1 and a T2. It is the Registry user's choice, as to whether or not he/she chooses a 1916 or a 1917 for the first slot.
I am going with a 1917, for now. I might buy a 1916 down the road, sometime, but not for awhile. There are other coins that I want more, right now.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
You have a very nice coin but not close to a full head. The 3 leaves are not there. Here are a couple of mine. One is a 64 full head and the other is a 63 full head. Strong full heads with complete shields and 5 toes also. These are about as good a strikes I have seen. The luster is subdued because the first one is a scan and the second one is taken with a crappy point and shoot camera with poor lighting.

Now that's what I call a full head.
@1946Hamm I like your 63 better than your 64.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I didn’t understand the FH guesses either. I watched this video a while back while staying at a Holiday Inn.
This video is kind of confusing and ambiguous. He defines type 2 full heads as ‘just made it’, ‘above average’ and ‘monster’.
Using that criteria, I think mine is a full head, because it is, at least, on the lower end of his full head spectrum.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/