Home U.S. Coin Forum

1921 SLQ GTG ****GRADE POSTED****

WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,500 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited August 2, 2021 3:22PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Guess the grade ;)

Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

«1

Comments

  • clarkbar04clarkbar04 Posts: 4,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66.

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,182 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't see anything limiting this coin from 66+ and perhaps 67. Beauty. Thanks for sharing.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,596 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like it, I'll go 66

    Collector, occasional seller

  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It is a gorgeous coin, that's for sure.

  • gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,591 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I will say 67 FH

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • HalfDimeDudeHalfDimeDude Posts: 1,206 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 1, 2021 4:05PM

    Yeah she's hammered 67 fh

    "That's why I wander and follow La Vie Dansante"

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like a 65/66... SLQ's were always a bit of a problem for me grading....guess it just seems such a busy design (obverse) Cheers, RickO

  • scotty4449scotty4449 Posts: 717 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice! I will go 67 FH

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,621 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66FH, maybe better. Very nice coin.

  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,527 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wonderfully struck! I agree with 66FH... or better...

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • CrackoutCrackout Posts: 1,372 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I love the look but I'm not sure if the luster is booming. I'll say MS64.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,025 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Beautiful coin, I’ll try 66+

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66

  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've seen too many of this design designated "full head" that weren't, so I'm not gonna hazard a guess on that.

  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,494 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not sure about the FH... but I am trying look for reasons to limit the grade without much luck. What a terrific coin. I would hope 66 is the floor with a 50% shot at 67. The photo is exceptional and makes the case for a significant grade.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,117 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Gorgeous, hammered, great date SLQ!! Congratulations!! <3

    66 or 66+ ... as for FH, I would suspect they gave it a FH designation. Maybe more importantly, awesome strike overall with nearly full chainmail, shield and rivets ... and she has a knee!


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • Steven59Steven59 Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 1, 2021 5:31PM

    MS66+FH - if that reverse scratch is on the holder then maybe even 67+

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 10,997 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65

  • Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,616 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66

    Dave

    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,427 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS64 FH

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,368 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS-66, Full Head.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,552 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Gorgeous example of a tough date slq….

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,253 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66FH to me.

    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • 1946Hamm1946Hamm Posts: 783 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64 not a full head

    Have a good day, Gary
  • metalmeistermetalmeister Posts: 4,587 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Graded Wow! Looks 66+

    email: ccacollectibles@yahoo.com

    100% Positive BST transactions
  • TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nope, that hit on the left leg (facing the coin) will keep it down, or it should.

    64 in my opinion, not full head.

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,010 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66FH, unless there are hairlines not apparent in the photo.

  • JJMJJM Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66FH

    👍BST's erickso1,cone10,MICHAELDIXON,TennesseeDave,p8nt,jmdm1194,RWW,robkool,Ahrensdad,Timbuk3,Downtown1974,bigjpst,mustanggt,Yorkshireman,idratherbgardening,SurfinxHI,derryb,masscrew,Walkerguy21D,MJ1927,sniocsu,Coll3tor,doubleeagle07,luciobar1980,PerryHall,SNMAM,mbcoin,liefgold,keyman64,maprince230,TorinoCobra71,RB1026,Weiss,LukeMarshall,Wingsrule,Silveryfire, pointfivezero,IKE1964,AL410, Tdec1000, AnkurJ,guitarwes,Type2,Bp777,jfoot113,JWP,mattniss,dantheman984,jclovescoins,Collectorcoins,Weather11am,Namvet69,kansasman,Bruce7789,ADG,Larrob37,Waverly
  • KoveKove Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭✭

    66+ FH

  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,496 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Smudge said:
    66FH, maybe better. Very nice coin.

    Agreed.

    Two dies developed cracks during use, the pictures follow.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • zas107zas107 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭

    ms64

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,464 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65 but not full head even if designated as such. While many call it well struck it strikes me as being a bit on the soft side, hence not a 66 by my standards.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,182 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow! Just noticed the MD on IN GOD WE TRUST almost makes it look 3d. That is kind of special. The toning prevented me from making a judgement regarding the FH designation, but it may well be. What a gorgeous example of a T2 SLQ. Congratulations and thank you for sharing.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • MarkInDavisMarkInDavis Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭✭

    66+ FH

    image Respectfully, Mark
  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The lack of full head detail doesn't surprise me-I don't personally think it has one. The low numeric grade is a surprise. They were pretty rough with the grade on that one.

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,500 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 2, 2021 4:25PM

    @koynekwest said:
    The lack of full head detail doesn't surprise me-I don't personally think it has one. The low numeric grade is a surprise. They were pretty rough with the grade on that one.

    You're actually correct. Now, that I have it in hand; I can see (with a loupe) a touch of flatness, on the very highest point, but I'd say that the head is still about 90% full.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,025 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 2, 2021 4:26PM

    Maybe time to send that little baby back in for a reconsideration. But I will say after looking at coin facts on these particular coins I found that they are very hard on them. In fact their 64 looks much like yours. At the same time the higher grades of 66 and 67 definitely show more Luster and is evident even in the pics.
    Anyway regardless of the number I would definitely buy that coin.

    Edit, I meant photo grade not CoinFacts. CoinFacts actually has yours pictured :-)

  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 2, 2021 4:49PM

    That would be enough for me. I think a full head quarter without a corresponding full shield is nothing special. You have a nice full shield on your '21. It's a truly outstanding coin and one that I'd be proud to own.

    This is the best I can do for a '21-VF30. I have a complete date set, excepting, of course the 1916.

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,500 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CoinscratchFever said:
    Maybe time to send that little baby back in for a reconsideration. But I will say after looking at coin facts on these particular coins I found that they are very hard on them. In fact their 64 looks much like yours. At the same time the higher grades of 66 and 67 definitely show more Luster and is evident even in the pics.
    Anyway regardless of the number I would definitely buy that coin.

    Edit, I meant photo grade not CoinFacts. CoinFacts actually has yours pictured :-)

    I might just do that, someday. The luster on mine looks better in hand and I love the hint of coppery-gold toning on it.

    I had no idea that mine was in CoinFacts. That's cool. I'll have to check it out!!

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,025 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It’s not on the top three though you have to click on view more images.

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,500 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 2, 2021 5:04PM

    @koynekwest said:
    That would be enough for me. I think a full head quarter without a corresponding full shield is nothing special. You have a nice full shield on your '21. It's a truly outstanding coin and one that I'd be proud to own.

    This is the best I can do for a '21-VF35. I have a complete date set, excepting, of course the 1916.

    Thank you. I agree with you regarding the shield.

    You have a very nice example, as well. :) It has a nice, original, silver-grey color and a lot of meat for a VF.

    I am doing my set ATS and they have a slot for a T1 and a T2. It is the Registry user's choice, as to whether or not he/she chooses a 1916 or a 1917 for the first slot.

    I am going with a 1917, for now. I might buy a 1916 down the road, sometime, but not for awhile. There are other coins that I want more, right now.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • 1946Hamm1946Hamm Posts: 783 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You have a very nice coin but not close to a full head. The 3 leaves are not there. Here are a couple of mine. One is a 64 full head and the other is a 63 full head. Strong full heads with complete shields and 5 toes also. These are about as good a strikes I have seen. The luster is subdued because the first one is a scan and the second one is taken with a crappy point and shoot camera with poor lighting.

    Have a good day, Gary
  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Now that's what I call a full head.

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,500 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1946Hamm I like your 63 better than your 64. ;)

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,025 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1946Hamm said:
    You have a very nice coin but not close to a full head. The 3 leaves are not there.

    I didn’t understand the FH guesses either. I watched this video a while back while staying at a Holiday Inn.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbRJMDTaSfs

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,500 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CoinscratchFever said:

    @1946Hamm said:
    You have a very nice coin but not close to a full head. The 3 leaves are not there.

    I didn’t understand the FH guesses either. I watched this video a while back while staying at a Holiday Inn.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbRJMDTaSfs

    This video is kind of confusing and ambiguous. He defines type 2 full heads as ‘just made it’, ‘above average’ and ‘monster’.

    Using that criteria, I think mine is a full head, because it is, at least, on the lower end of his full head spectrum.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file