Some better strike Buffalo Nickels for your entertainment

ChrisH821

Just because. A couple of these have been posted before but just took some fresh pictures.
Sorry these display pretty large, not sure how to get the forum to size them smaller.
1913 Type 1


1913-D Type 1


1917


1923


1929-S


1935 -currently raw


1936

Thanks for looking, hope you enjoyed.
Feel free to add some of your own.

Mr_Spud

They look great 🌜

winesteven

This proof was probably among the first struck from newly polished dies. All “distractions” you see in the two photos are just reflections, as none appear on the coin in hand. Talk about “watery, liquid silver”!
PCGS PR67+, with CAC:

Treashunt

@winesteven said:
This proof was probably among the first struck from newly polished dies. All “distractions” you see in the two photos are just reflections, as none appear on the coin in hand. Talk about “watery, liquid silver”!
PCGS PR67+, with CAC:

amazing.

Black.Diamond

Very nice looking herd.

ricko

@winesteven ... I have never seen a Buff like that one... Incredible.
@ChrisH821... No need to apologize for the large photo's... they are great... and the coins are really nice.
Cheers, RickO

Jimnight

Nice ones!

koynekwest

Those are outstanding!

This is just about the most notable strike on a Buffalo nickel I've ever seen. It looks like some kind of specimen strike. I know it's not, tho. This is just about as good as they come for a business strike-here's no weakness anywhere-it's 100% all there. And it's on a date that often comes with a miserable strike.

winesteven

@ricko said:
@winesteven ... I have never seen a Buff like that one... Incredible.
@ChrisH821... No need to apologize for the large photo's... they are great... and the coins are really nice.
Cheers, RickO

@ricko - Screw the CAC already on my Proof Buffalo - can I get the highly coveted Ricko BW sticker (Blast White) for that coin? BTW, it’s been MANY months since I’ve seen you award that cherished sticker to ANY coins on this forum.

Steve

ChrisH821

@winesteven an outstanding example!
Here is my PR66, I don't think it has been to CAC yet.

koynekwest

With the exception of the 1936 and 1937 Brilliant proofs (many of those show incomplete detailing on the braid), the proof issues can be expected with a full strike. Here's my 1916 Matte proof. Nearly all of the matte proofs and the 1936 satin proof do come with a full, complete strike.

koynekwest

"Sorry these display pretty large, not sure how to get the forum to size them smaller."

Large is good!

gumby1234

My recent purchase.

ricko

@winesteven.... I recently had a computer crash - MAJOR crash....and seems I have lost a bunch of stuff, my sticker among the lost files. Been trying for a couple of weeks to get stuff back... but no luck on the sticker yet. Your Buff would certainly get one. Cheers, RickO

koynekwest

That's an outstanding strike and die state for the date, gumby1234!

gumby1234

@koynekwest Thanks. That is why I bought it
Tough date with a nice strike.

winesteven

@ricko said:
@winesteven.... I recently had a computer crash - MAJOR crash....and seems I have lost a bunch of stuff, my sticker among the lost files. Been trying for a couple of weeks to get stuff back... but no luck on the sticker yet. Your Buff would certainly get one. Cheers, RickO

Oh, so sad . In all seriousness, I hope you can get everything fixed. With only a bit less seriousness, the numismatic community is at a great loss without your ability to selectively apply the coveted BW sticker.

Steve

ricko

@winesteven... Thank you... will continue to try.... Cheers, RickO

jesbroken

Here is my favorite Buffalo. No Blast White here.
Jim

ChrisH821

@ricko said:
@winesteven... Thank you... will continue to try.... Cheers, RickO

Found this one out there, but I remember it being grey, not yellow

koynekwest

@jesbroken said:
Here is my favorite Buffalo. No Blast White here.
Jim

Very pretty and a helluva strike!

ricko

@ChrisH821 ... Thanks Chris... and Yes, it was in grey/silver shades. Cheers, RickO

ricko

@winesteven .... Here you go... Finally found it.... Cheers, RickO

gumby1234

@ChrisH821 said:

@ricko said:
@winesteven... Thank you... will continue to try.... Cheers, RickO

Found this one out there, but I remember it being grey, not yellow

That one is tarnished

clarkbar04

That 29-s is the biggest standout in my opinion.

koynekwest

I, too like that '29-S. It's just a whisper away from a full strike. Only .6% of the date came with a full strike in my extensive strike study of the series.

crazyhounddog

Great looking examples here👍

koynekwest

ChrisH821-is your 1913 Var 1 a matte proof? It has the rims, surfaces, and strike of one.

ChrisH821

@clarkbar04 said:
That 29-s is the biggest standout in my opinion.

I agree, it's really something else. It's graded 65+ and if I remember correctly I bought it from Stuppler last year(or so).
Believe it or not I am having a hard time finding a 1935 that stands up to the one I have pictured above. It will be going to PCGS so that I can include it in my registry date set. After that I will only need a 1924 but I'm having a very hard time finding one that I like.

Coinscratch

They're all nice but I like the 17 the most.

ChrisH821

@koynekwest said:
ChrisH821-is your 1913 Var 1 a matte proof? It has the rims, surfaces, and strike of one.

It is not, that one was a raw ebay purchase that ended up grading MS66. It really does stand out from the others though.
The seller had it listed as one of those bid or buy now type auctions, I really liked the look so I used the buy now option which was really quite reasonable.
Here is the trueview for that one:

koynekwest

Here is a 1913 var 1 I have that I could have sworn was a proof. After two trips to our host it graded Mint state both times. The edge is the key with these things.

clarkbar04

1924 is a tough date for strike and color, as are most 1920s dates. This was just sent in and will complete my toned date set. Not a full strike but it’s 1920s good.

clarkbar04

@ChrisH821 said:

@clarkbar04 said:
That 29-s is the biggest standout in my opinion.

I agree, it's really something else. It's graded 65+ and if I remember correctly I bought it from Stuppler last year(or so).
Believe it or not I am having a hard time finding a 1935 that stands up to the one I have pictured above. It will be going to PCGS so that I can include it in my registry date set. After that I will only need a 1924 but I'm having a very hard time finding one that I like.

Looks like a solid 66 if not 66+ to me.

koynekwest

Nice color, nice strike. Nice coin!

Off_Cent_er

ChrisH821

@clarkbar04 said:
1924 is a tough date for strike and color, as are most 1920s dates. This was just sent in and will complete my toned date set. Not a full strike but it’s 1920s good.

Very nice 24!

@Off_Cent_er 1914 was one that I had a tough time finding that I liked. Seemed like the majority of them have major die clashes that I wanted to avoid. Yours looks pretty solid!

FullHorn

@clarkbar04 said:
1924 is a tough date for strike and color, as are most 1920s dates. This was just sent in and will complete my toned date set. Not a full strike but it’s 1920s good.

Check out the reverse on my 24. The flattened D in united is a pretty good match.

FullHorn

ChrisH821,

This 29 S is in a 65 holder. I figured I had to buy it when I saw it as the strike seemed unbeatable. But now I see yours....

I need that 17 and 23 for my set. So feel free send it my way when your done with them

ChrisH821

@FullHorn said:

@clarkbar04 said:
1924 is a tough date for strike and color, as are most 1920s dates. This was just sent in and will complete my toned date set. Not a full strike but it’s 1920s good.

Check out the reverse on my 24. The flattened D in united is a pretty good match.

the "TED STAT" area is frequently flat because it is opposite of the high relief shoulder/date area that is opposite of it.

ChrisH821

@FullHorn said:
ChrisH821,

This 29 S is in a 65 holder. I figured I had to buy it when I saw it as the strike seemed unbeatable. But now I see yours....

I need that 17 and 23 for my set. So feel free send it my way when your done with them

Still a very nice strike. If I ever upgrade those two, which will be tough to do, I'll let you know!

HalfDimeDude

@winesteven said:
This proof was probably among the first struck from newly polished dies. All “distractions” you see in the two photos are just reflections, as none appear on the coin in hand. Talk about “watery, liquid silver”!
PCGS PR67+, with CAC:

I love wet look proofs....actually more than frost

crazyhounddog

One of my favorites from my collection. NGC has this one graded as a 66. I see it a bit nicer. The strike is all there in fact I’d say it’s hammered.
Great thread. I hope it stays around for a while.

stockdude_

Some real nice Buffs posted here. I only buy well struck coins so its of interest to me. I consider the strike the most important aspect of a coin.

koynekwest

@FullHorn said:

@clarkbar04 said:
1924 is a tough date for strike and color, as are most 1920s dates. This was just sent in and will complete my toned date set. Not a full strike but it’s 1920s good.

Check out the reverse on my 24. The flattened D in united is a pretty good match.

That is a pretty nice 1924. Nice strike, too.

koynekwest

@stockdude_ said:
Some real nice Buffs posted here. I only buy well struck coins so its of interest to me. I consider the strike the most important aspect of a coin.

On this series the strike is critical, as is the die state.

crazyhounddog

I think these 3 here might qualify

koynekwest

The 1921 issue typically comes with an excellent strike but your 1923 is unusual and outstanding! You don't see many 1923 dated coins struck like that. Broadstrikes almost always show full or near full strikes in the centers of the coin.

ad4400

From someone who’s primary goal was to pursue a well struck set, I can truly appreciate your accomplishments. Here are some that are pretty rudely struck .

ChrisH821

@ad4400 I really like that 1920!

koynekwest

That's some amazing stuff, Alain! The '36-D looks to be 99%+ fully struck-the reverse appears to be 100% and the 1920 is a wonder-100% fully struck, very unusual for the date! Full strikes for that date comprise only .6% of the issue. Nice die states on all three, too. And, of course, that is a very nice two feather on that '13-D.

Here's my fully struck 1920. Can't compare to yours, tho-