Home U.S. Coin Forum

VEGAS SHOW NEWS - Biggest News for Mercury Dimes in Quite Some Time!

keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

Fresh News from the Vegas Show this Week! 07/15/2021
WOW WOW WOW!

The owner of THREE 1916-D Mercury Dimes in PCGS MS67FB CAC submitted them all for upgrade on Tuesday. The expectation/intent was not that they would all upgrade. Since they are all CAC, the owner thought it would be a good idea to submit them together so the graders would have the rare opportunity to examine them all at the same time. Last week, for a short period of time, the owner actually had four in 67FB but sold the very nice white example that was not CAC. Up until today, there were 10 graded as PCGS MS67FB. Today, there are only 9.

Here is the New Stand Alone Top Pop and Only 1916-D in PCGS MS67+FB CAC...granted, it will have to go back for a new sticker since the holder changed. Congratulations!

"If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:

Comments

  • OldIndianNutKaseOldIndianNutKase Posts: 2,712 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just WOW. Th/e toning is perfectly natural and symmetric. I hope it got re-slabbed with an inert gas like argon to prevent any further toning.

    OINK

  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What a coin! Just beautiful!

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,859 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow!

  • USSID17USSID17 Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Stunning!

  • Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,616 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Amazing example!

    Dave

    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,407 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats on the +!

    No Price Guide value placed on the OP coin yet. With a jump from $85K (MS66+ FB) to $155K (MS67FB), I don't think $250K would be out of line.

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @oih82w8 said:
    Congrats on the +!

    No Price Guide value placed on the OP coin yet. With a jump from $85K (MS66+ FB) to $155K (MS67FB), I don't think $250K would be out of line.

    There have been common date top pop examples that have sold for more than $250k. This example sold for $204K in March of 2020, before this upgrade. This is long considered to be a key for the series and it is now the stand alone top pop. If it went to auction with a few eager bidders, $250k might be where the bidding starts, not where it ends.

    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • WCCWCC Posts: 2,655 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I take as support that there aren't as many duplicates as is often believed.

  • LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,429 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow - that's a looker! Thanks for the report. :+1:

    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.
  • P0CKETCHANGEP0CKETCHANGE Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @keyman64 said:
    Since they are all CAC, the owner thought it would be a good idea to submit them together so the graders >would have the rare opportunity to examine them all at the same time.

    Is the implication here that sending all three coins at once increased the likelihood that one of them ended up with a plus grade, because the graders were able to compare the three and make the determination that one was meaningfully better than the others?

    Nothing is as expensive as free money.

  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @P0CKETCHANGE said:

    @keyman64 said:
    Since they are all CAC, the owner thought it would be a good idea to submit them together so the graders >would have the rare opportunity to examine them all at the same time.

    Is the implication here that sending all three coins at once increased the likelihood that one of them ended up with a plus grade, because the graders were able to compare the three and make the determination that one was meaningfully better than the others?

    Not sure as I do not know all of PCGS’ procedures. Considering he has owned four at one time and has seen a few more examples I think there is some level of confidence that he owns the best examples he could find which have been blessed by CAC. It does make sense that PCGS was provided with the opportunity to examine them together and compare. I know there was a 67FB example that sold at HA several years back that appears to have a few bad carbon spots on the reverse. Clearly, not all 67FB examples are created equal. Providing three CAC examples to PCGS at the same time seems to have been a good approach.

    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • RB1026RB1026 Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭✭

    Breathtaking piece! LOVE the eye appeal. Thanks for sharing!

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,095 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Gazes said:
    The fact that three 67 FB cac were submitted at the same time I think adds value to the one that graded a + since they could look at all three together and determined which one was best.

    That's exactly why they were submitted at the same time. There was an expectation that one would be determined to be the best. It would get awarded a plus and become single finest. It gets an extra registry bonus for that, too, on top of the Obscene Profit™ windfall for the minor upgrade should it get sold. PCGS now also gets to promote the finest known 16-D Mercury dime.

  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @tcollects said:
    I'm pretty sure the toning limits it to a 58 where's that guy

    Do you really want to go there? LOL.

    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,117 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oh merci! <3

    Simply Stunning.

    Do the other two have TV's available to compare? I have not doubt about this one being the finest, but it might be interesting to see what PCGS saw.


    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,830 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They call that “making it easy for the graders.”

    :)

  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @keyman64 said:
    Fresh News from the Vegas Show this Week! 07/15/2021
    WOW WOW WOW!

    The owner of THREE 1916-D Mercury Dimes in PCGS MS67FB CAC submitted them all for upgrade on Tuesday. The expectation/intent was not that they would all upgrade. Since they are all CAC, the owner thought it would be a good idea to submit them together so the graders would have the rare opportunity to examine them all at the same time. Last week, for a short period of time, the owner actually had four in 67FB but sold the very nice white example that was not CAC. Up until today, there were 10 graded as PCGS MS67FB. Today, there are only 9.

    Here is the New Stand Alone Top Pop and Only 1916-D in PCGS MS67+FB CAC...granted, it will have to go back for a new sticker since the holder changed. Congratulations!

    Guess the grade on this one

    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,707 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like the even toning on that one. It don't look sloppy, nice

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,030 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 16, 2021 3:58AM

    @pmh1nic said:

    @keyman64 said:
    Fresh News from the Vegas Show this Week! 07/15/2021
    WOW WOW WOW!

    The owner of THREE 1916-D Mercury Dimes in PCGS MS67FB CAC submitted them all for upgrade on Tuesday. The expectation/intent was not that they would all upgrade. Since they are all CAC, the owner thought it would be a good idea to submit them together so the graders would have the rare opportunity to examine them all at the same time. Last week, for a short period of time, the owner actually had four in 67FB but sold the very nice white example that was not CAC. Up until today, there were 10 graded as PCGS MS67FB. Today, there are only 9.

    Here is the New Stand Alone Top Pop and Only 1916-D in PCGS MS67+FB CAC...granted, it will have to go back for a new sticker since the holder changed. Congratulations!

    Guess the grade on this one

    69FB
    Edited to add: MS68FB at a minimum. Without looking at the pop reports, my recollection is that I’m merely going with the odds, considering the date, the color and that phenomenal group of similarly toned beauties.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 6,194 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Should of dipped her before the reslab. Nothing nastier than toned silver imo.

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,464 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll bet that 1916-D pictured in the first post has had very few different owners over time. Surviving for 105 years in that condition, most of those years before being slabbed, was a real challenge. Is any history on the coin known?

    All glory is fleeting.
  • FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,424 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Think about this. The 19D and 27D have NO 67's period and the 24S has no 67FB coins graded by PCGS either. I think it would be huge if one of those dates made a 67FB coin. The 16D is common compared to the above three dates.

    Ken

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Amazing dimes.... Must have been kept well virtually from time of issue to be in that condition after 105 years. Cheers, RickO

  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Fairlaneman said:
    Think about this. The 19D and 27D have NO 67's period and the 24S has no 67FB coins graded by PCGS either. I think it would be huge if one of those dates made a 67FB coin. The 16D is common compared to the above three dates.

    Ken

    Correct, Ken. Feel free to revisit my 2012 thread on this topic. In MS and MSFB, the 1916-D is not THE key to the series. There are others that are much more difficult. I think I will do a 2021 update of my research this weekend so we can take a fresh look at where the populations stand 10 years later. Maybe I will go a little deeper into the analysis as well.
    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/858446/mercury-dime-key-semi-key-analysis

    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • GotTheBugGotTheBug Posts: 1,683 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Imagine if one of your ancestors had set aside a roll of 16-D's when they were first issued. Where's that time machine that somebody has to be working on?

  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @pmh1nic said:

    @keyman64 said:
    Fresh News from the Vegas Show this Week! 07/15/2021
    WOW WOW WOW!

    The owner of THREE 1916-D Mercury Dimes in PCGS MS67FB CAC submitted them all for upgrade on Tuesday. The expectation/intent was not that they would all upgrade. Since they are all CAC, the owner thought it would be a good idea to submit them together so the graders would have the rare opportunity to examine them all at the same time. Last week, for a short period of time, the owner actually had four in 67FB but sold the very nice white example that was not CAC. Up until today, there were 10 graded as PCGS MS67FB. Today, there are only 9.

    Here is the New Stand Alone Top Pop and Only 1916-D in PCGS MS67+FB CAC...granted, it will have to go back for a new sticker since the holder changed. Congratulations!

    Guess the grade on this one

    69FB
    Edited to add: MS68FB at a minimum. Without looking at the pop reports, my recollection is that I’m merely going with the odds, considering the date, the color and that phenomenal group of similarly toned beauties.

    NGC MS-69FB CAC

    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,520 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 16, 2021 4:54PM

    @pmh1nic said:
    NGC MS-69FB CAC

    This thread has nothing to do with 1939-D Mercs. The 1939-D is not even close to being a key date, came more than two decades later, socio-economic times were different, coin saving was different, has a different relief, mintage figures are way different. I have no idea how you are trying to relate the 39-D you posted to the PCGS populations of 1916-D Mercs in MS67FB or better...or the news that one upgraded this week, creating a new stand alone top pop for the date. Not sure if you are just oddly trolling this thread. Sure, it looks like a nice Merc but this is not the thread for it. Hence my original reason for not replying. Also, that coin is a well known 1939-D that resides in a PCGS MS69FB CAC holder and has a quality True View photo in Coin Facts.

    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 16, 2021 8:36PM

    @keyman64 said:

    @pmh1nic said:
    NGC MS-69FB CAC

    This thread has nothing to do with 1939-D Mercs. The 1939-D is not even close to being a key date, came more than two decades later, socio-economic times were different, coin saving was different, has a different relief, mintage figures are way different. I have no idea how you are trying to relate the 39-D you posted to the PCGS populations of 1916-D Mercs in MS67FB or better...or the news that one upgraded this week, creating a new stand alone top pop for the date. Not sure if you are just oddly trolling this thread. Sure, it looks like a nice Merc but this is not the thread for it. Hence my original reason for not replying.

    Trolling? Not at all.

    While the coins being discussed in the OP are 16-D the question of grade was raised. The 16-D shown is a 67FB CAC and one of the coins of the three referenced is a 67+ CAC. THE photo of the coin I posted is a 69FB CAC. The questions are what characters of the 69FB CAC justify the 2 point difference in grade? If the expectation is that one of the 67FB coins is going to be bumped up to 68FB what is the basis for the bump? If one of the coins is bumped is that an admission that the original grade was somehow technically flawed? If not technically flawed but based on a comparison of the three coins does that mean grades are assigned on a curve?

    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • remumcremumc Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭

    Greg, Looking forward to your new updated analysis! There are a couple dimes I have been looking to upgrade for years that I have not see for sale or had had the opportunity to buy.

    Regards,

    Wayne

    www.waynedriskillminiatures.com
  • ColonelJessupColonelJessup Posts: 6,442 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    Amazing dimes.... Must have been kept well virtually from time of issue to be in that condition after 105 years. Cheers, RickO

    I think the implication here is that they're probably original and likely would not offend if presented without a dunking :p

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
  • ColonelJessupColonelJessup Posts: 6,442 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 21, 2021 10:12AM

    @pmh1nic said:

    @keyman64 said:

    @pmh1nic said:
    NGC MS-69FB CAC

    This thread has nothing to do with 1939-D Mercs. The 1939-D is not even close to being a key date, came more than two decades later, socio-economic times were different, coin saving was different, has a different relief, mintage figures are way different. I have no idea how you are trying to relate the 39-D you posted to the PCGS populations of 1916-D Mercs in MS67FB or better...or the news that one upgraded this week, creating a new stand alone top pop for the date. Not sure if you are just oddly trolling this thread. Sure, it looks like a nice Merc but this is not the thread for it. Hence my original reason for not replying.

    Trolling? Not at all.

    While the coins being discussed in the OP are 16-D the question of grade was raised. The 16-D shown is a 67FB CAC and one of the coins of the three referenced is a 67+ CAC. THE photo of the coin I posted is a 69FB CAC. The questions are what characters of the 69FB CAC justify the 2 point difference in grade? If the expectation is that one of the 67FB coins is going to be bumped up to 68FB what is the basis for the bump? If one of the coins is bumped is that an admission that the original grade was somehow technically flawed? If not technically flawed but based on a comparison of the three coins does that mean grades are assigned on a curve?

    Only an uninformed numismatist individual would equate the splendiferously gorgeous yet totally inconsequential examples of a 39-D with anything approaching relevance to the OP's examples of a pretty tough yet not under-rated Merc rarity.

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @remumc said:
    Greg, Looking forward to your new updated analysis! There are a couple dimes I have been looking to upgrade for years that I have not see for sale or had had the opportunity to buy.

    I at least started on it over the weekend. It will be very interesting to compare notes with you and the subject of this thread when I am done. :)

    On another note, one of my four submissions from FUN (6 Mercs) wrapped up as they just needed variety attributions but still waiting on two True Views for those that needed it.

    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • remumcremumc Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭

    Greg,

    I've received all my coins back from PCGS. Had the whole set regraded with gold shield holders & true views. Received 7 more upgrades, 12 upgrades total. All true views are now posted to my set. I'll post a thread on this when I get time. Have a peek when you get a chance.

    Regards,

    Wayne

    www.waynedriskillminiatures.com
  • ARCOARCO Posts: 4,420 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great coin. What kid growing up didn't dream about the 16-D?

  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,520 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @remumc said:
    Greg,

    I've received all my coins back from PCGS. Had the whole set regraded with gold shield holders & true views. Received 7 more upgrades, 12 upgrades total. All true views are now posted to my set. I'll post a thread on this when I get time. Have a peek when you get a chance.

    Holy cow! That’s fantastic, congratulations! I’m looking forward to your thread but I will absolutely be looking tonight. Congrats again!!!

    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ColonelJessup said:

    @pmh1nic said:

    @keyman64 said:

    @pmh1nic said:
    NGC MS-69FB CAC

    This thread has nothing to do with 1939-D Mercs. The 1939-D is not even close to being a key date, came more than two decades later, socio-economic times were different, coin saving was different, has a different relief, mintage figures are way different. I have no idea how you are trying to relate the 39-D you posted to the PCGS populations of 1916-D Mercs in MS67FB or better...or the news that one upgraded this week, creating a new stand alone top pop for the date. Not sure if you are just oddly trolling this thread. Sure, it looks like a nice Merc but this is not the thread for it. Hence my original reason for not replying.

    Trolling? Not at all.

    While the coins being discussed in the OP are 16-D the question of grade was raised. The 16-D shown is a 67FB CAC and one of the coins of the three referenced is a 67+ CAC. THE photo of the coin I posted is a 69FB CAC. The questions are what characters of the 69FB CAC justify the 2 point difference in grade? If the expectation is that one of the 67FB coins is going to be bumped up to 68FB what is the basis for the bump? If one of the coins is bumped is that an admission that the original grade was somehow technically flawed? If not technically flawed but based on a comparison of the three coins does that mean grades are assigned on a curve?

    Only an uninformed numismatist individual would equate the splendiferously gorgeous yet totally inconsequential examples of a 39-D with anything approaching relevance to the OP's examples of a pretty tough yet not under-rated Merc rarity.

    They would only be inconsequential examples to someone trying to avoid the questions. They don't like the questions because answering either of them exposes the imprecise nature of grading AND the fragile foundation on which substantial premiums are paid for a one point difference in the number on the slab.

    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • ColonelJessupColonelJessup Posts: 6,442 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 22, 2021 5:41AM

    @pmh1nic said:

    @ColonelJessup said:

    @pmh1nic said:

    @keyman64 said:

    @pmh1nic said:
    NGC MS-69FB CAC

    This thread has nothing to do with 1939-D Mercs. The 1939-D is not even close to being a key date, came more than two decades later, socio-economic times were different, coin saving was different, has a different relief, mintage figures are way different. I have no idea how you are trying to relate the 39-D you posted to the PCGS populations of 1916-D Mercs in MS67FB or better...or the news that one upgraded this week, creating a new stand alone top pop for the date. Not sure if you are just oddly trolling this thread. Sure, it looks like a nice Merc but this is not the thread for it. Hence my original reason for not replying.

    Trolling? Not at all.

    While the coins being discussed in the OP are 16-D the question of grade was raised. The 16-D shown is a 67FB CAC and one of the coins of the three referenced is a 67+ CAC. THE photo of the coin I posted is a 69FB CAC. The questions are what characters of the 69FB CAC justify the 2 point difference in grade? If the expectation is that one of the 67FB coins is going to be bumped up to 68FB what is the basis for the bump? If one of the coins is bumped is that an admission that the original grade was somehow technically flawed? If not technically flawed but based on a comparison of the three coins does that mean grades are assigned on a curve?

    Only an uninformed numismatist individual would equate the splendiferously gorgeous yet totally inconsequential examples of a 39-D with anything approaching relevance to the OP's examples of a pretty tough yet not under-rated Merc rarity.

    They would only be inconsequential examples to someone trying to avoid the questions. They don't like the questions because answering either of them exposes the imprecise nature of grading AND the fragile foundation on which substantial premiums are paid for a one point difference in the number on the slab.

    Dave Bowers called with the same complaint. I agree with you both. I feel your pain >:)
    Even though we're putatively discussing dimes, "Here's a quarter. Call someone that cares".

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
  • pmh1nicpmh1nic Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ColonelJessup said:

    @pmh1nic said:

    @ColonelJessup said:

    @pmh1nic said:

    @keyman64 said:

    @pmh1nic said:
    NGC MS-69FB CAC

    This thread has nothing to do with 1939-D Mercs. The 1939-D is not even close to being a key date, came more than two decades later, socio-economic times were different, coin saving was different, has a different relief, mintage figures are way different. I have no idea how you are trying to relate the 39-D you posted to the PCGS populations of 1916-D Mercs in MS67FB or better...or the news that one upgraded this week, creating a new stand alone top pop for the date. Not sure if you are just oddly trolling this thread. Sure, it looks like a nice Merc but this is not the thread for it. Hence my original reason for not replying.

    Trolling? Not at all.

    While the coins being discussed in the OP are 16-D the question of grade was raised. The 16-D shown is a 67FB CAC and one of the coins of the three referenced is a 67+ CAC. THE photo of the coin I posted is a 69FB CAC. The questions are what characters of the 69FB CAC justify the 2 point difference in grade? If the expectation is that one of the 67FB coins is going to be bumped up to 68FB what is the basis for the bump? If one of the coins is bumped is that an admission that the original grade was somehow technically flawed? If not technically flawed but based on a comparison of the three coins does that mean grades are assigned on a curve?

    Only an uninformed numismatist individual would equate the splendiferously gorgeous yet totally inconsequential examples of a 39-D with anything approaching relevance to the OP's examples of a pretty tough yet not under-rated Merc rarity.

    They would only be inconsequential examples to someone trying to avoid the questions. They don't like the questions because answering either of them exposes the imprecise nature of grading AND the fragile foundation on which substantial premiums are paid for a one point difference in the number on the slab.

    Dave Bowers called with the same complaint. I agree with you both. I feel your pain >:)
    Even though we're putatively discussing dimes, "Here's a quarter. Call someone that cares".

    That’s all you had to say. You didn’t have to waste words with multiple post. Saying “I don’t care” would have been a similar dodging of the questions while expending a lot less energy.

    The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 5,984 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think I may have seen that dime before.
    I believe it is from the Joshua 2 collection????

    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • remumcremumc Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭

    You are correct PT, that is the Joshua II 16-D, good eye, & memory!!!

    I wonder if the owner knows?

    I can only dream of owning such a dime. It's now probably worth more than my whole collection.

    Regards,

    Wayne

    www.waynedriskillminiatures.com
  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,520 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 22, 2021 6:24PM

    @remumc said:
    You are correct PT, that is the Joshua II 16-D, good eye, & memory!!!

    I wonder if the owner knows?

    I can only dream of owning such a dime. It's now probably worth more than my whole collection.

    Yes, the current owner knows.

    Provenance:
    From the D. Brent Pogue Collection.

    Heritage's sale of the Joshua II Collection of Mercury Dimes, #1 All-Time Finest PCGS Registry Set, August 2010 Boston ANA Signature & Platinum Night Auction, lot 4490.

    Heritage's sale of the William Dominick Collection, April 2001 CSNS Signature Sale, lot 6208;

    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • remumcremumc Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭
    edited July 23, 2021 7:00PM

    Wow, that dime has been in some of the best & most famous Merc collections ever! I know the owner is "Walking on air"! He also upgraded a 40-D to MS68+FB at the show. His was a solo pop top until I had my set regraded. Now there are 3.

    Congrats to the owner, the dime is deserving of the grade in my opinion. Like Greg, I know who the owner is, but will respect his privacy.

    Regards,

    Wayne

    www.waynedriskillminiatures.com
  • GoBustGoBust Posts: 599 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Merc Madness is insane in his pursuit of perfecting the best imaginable set of full band mercury dimes. CONGRATULATIONS!!!

  • GoBustGoBust Posts: 599 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 23, 2021 9:18PM

    He knew ahead of time in his mind that this specimen was a step ahead of the others. Excellent review by PCGS to make the pop 1 none finer as well. It appears to be the proper plus upgrade from my vantage point.

  • zas107zas107 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭
    edited July 24, 2021 5:42AM

    Disregard wrong coin

  • DCWDCW Posts: 7,480 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What an outstanding dime, full of eye appeal. I like the strategy of submitting all three at once. While the number on the label shouldn't exactly mean it is the best, it was, as you said a rare opportunity to compare the best of the best at one sitting.
    And this one stood out.

    Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
    "Coin collecting for outcasts..."

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file