Ever see a coin graded XF 45+
RedCopper
Posts: 173 ✭✭✭
I have never heard of this grade before last week when I received a silver colonial coin
back from PCGS graded XF 45+.
I was informed this grade was initiated
10 years ago when plus grading started.
I’m confused, does this mean the coin is XF 47
or AU 48 ?
I understand ms 63+ to ms67+ but XF 45+
What do you think ?
0
Comments
I've got 2 Barber Halves graded XF45+.
I have a 44-O $5 in 45+ CAC
Latin American Collection
I think 47 is (way) too low for a plus. And maybe 48, also. But 49 or 49+ works.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I had a 1899-P half graded XF+ a few tears ago
I seen one on EBay.
I think:
1. A + grade means the coin has exceptional eye appeal.
2. If number 1 is true, then it could apply to any grade.
3. I'd like to see a picture of your silver colonial coin.
My last submission had an XF45+ on it. I did not know they used the plus grades for extra fine coins.
I think it's stupid. They need to pick the damn grade.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
I would also like to see it @RedCopper
Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb
Bad transactions with : nobody to date
Agree with ms70. Enough is enough. PL+ or PL* or XF* or ...........and the beat goes on.
From PCGS
.
"Plus Grades" exhibit exceptional eye appeal for the grade and constitute the top 30% of the coins in the grade.
Only XF-45 through MS/PR-68 are eligible for Plus grades. Numerically, this includes 45, 50, 53, 55, 58, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, & 68.
Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb
Bad transactions with : nobody to date
Plus grades are like plus sizes in women's clothes... gives them a little more room without moving up in numbers.... Cheers, RickO
I don't think TPG's should opine about what's eye appealing and what's not. It's a very strong personal preference that's evidenced right here on this forum.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
Yes, I have seen a few and it's not very common a grade in the series I collect. I see the coins as 'really nice' 45s that are just shy of AU. Here are a couple of examples, one from each NGC and PCGS:
1822 O.110a, R2 NGC XF-45+ CAC
1836 O.113a, R3 PCGS XF-45+ CAC
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
In a hundred years the condition of the coin will be incredibly important and the grade assigned today totally irrelevant.
Just a guess.
In a 100 years, robots will be grading coins and we'll all be dead. Just sayin'.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Here’s a 1857 45+ $20
Here’s another 45+ CBH
How should one price an XF45+ coin? Would if be half way between an XF45 and an AU50?
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
To the moon!!
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
I believe a couple submissions may have gotten that grade. Thinking they were capped bust halves, if memory serves.
I'd like to think mine is a 49. CAC approved.
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase/2819
But plus grades aren't jusdt about exceptinal eye-appeal. They ar e> @PerryHall said:
Among other things, it depends upon the date, the type and the value in AU50. There is no easy formula. Some plus coins bring insignificant premiums, while others bring very large ones.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I've had one grade that so far. 1904 S Barber Dime.
come on @ms70 , don't hold back ... tell us what you really think!
... and for what it's worth, I agree with you!!
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
45+ means crack it out and send it FL for AU. 😂🤣
"He who loves silver will not be satisfied with silver, nor he who loves abundance, with increase. This also is vanity.
When goods increase, they increase who eat them -- so what profit have the owners, except to see them with their eyes?"
"Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: fear God and keep His commandments, for this is man’s all.
For God will bring every work into judgment, including every secret thing, whether good or evil."
"Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man comes to the Father but by Me."
http://www.youtube.com/user/alohabibleprophecy/videos
This is the only XF I have that doesn't have a number..
This one might qualify as XF-45+.
PCGS XF-45 w/gold CAC
Latin American Collection
I think it’s more practical and realistic than using 11 different numerical grades to distinguish mint state and proof coins.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Good morning Mark. @MFeld
While that may be true, the subjectivity and often times inconsistency of the grading spectrum, whether it be nuances between a 64 and a 65 (or any other MS grade), or the differences in the "more technical" grades of AU and below will always lead to debate.
For what it's worth, I think that debate is healthy, but I also see that the technical grades are being skewed. Is a 45 a 45, or is it a 53 that has a scrape, mark, spot, or area that can't allow for a grader to call it a 53 that day, but it's not a bag, so it's a market 45? If so then is the true 45, without issue and reasonable looks a plus?
It can be argued that the added pluses or stars, help further that debate, but in the MS / PR grades, then we are at decimal grading effectively, correct? Should we go farther there? Is an effective half-point enough? Is the plus sufficient to determine the differences? If that's the case, then why not just go all the way and use 1 through 59 for circulated?
Sans that, we have effectively split every market grade at least once. Maybe not technically, but for what someone deems "marketability". Adding in the opinion of the opinion with a sticker of some sort, and the grading spectrum becomes a more dizzying array of opinions and subjectivity to the less advanced.
Let's play the old cover the grade game and see if we can put the widgets back in their shells, with all the right modifiers to boot. You know the game. I'm sure you're better than many at it. I use widgets because some coins are recognizable, especially to photographic memories.
Finally, I also think what is considered premium is different to different people, surely graders as well, and so these additional modifiers (the plus or the star, then later the sticker or the bean) tend to compile opinion atop opinion.
In the end it is human nature for most to immediately want to fit the peg in the hole, instead of looking at the peg without too much prejudice.
In essence, sometimes we need to stop and enjoy the coin for the coin.
I know there's a lot of money to be made from opinion and subjectivity.
I also don't disagree with all of it, because I remember the end of the wild west.
Some of it though ... well I think some of it is too much (at least for me). And overall, I don't always feel that is in the collectors best interest.
Of course, I could be wrong.
Todd
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
I have one, I think it’s really a 50-.
That looks like a 50-53 to me. Nice coin by the way.
Todd, don’t get me wrong - I’m not for any further attempts at grading refinement. I think we already have more than is practical for purposes of objectivity and consistency.
I wish there were an option to “love” and not just “like” a post. If there were, I would have chosen it for yours.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Fixed it for ya! > @MFeld said:
Eye appeal is subjective and should not be used as a criteria for grading a coin
Subjective eye appeal isn't used as a criteria for grading, only obvious eye appeal - which is almost a given.
"He who loves silver will not be satisfied with silver, nor he who loves abundance, with increase. This also is vanity.
When goods increase, they increase who eat them -- so what profit have the owners, except to see them with their eyes?"
"Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: fear God and keep His commandments, for this is man’s all.
For God will bring every work into judgment, including every secret thing, whether good or evil."
"Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man comes to the Father but by Me."
http://www.youtube.com/user/alohabibleprophecy/videos
Price it like a coin graded XF with a Green Bean?
Just an IMHOP guess.
Pete