Best Of
Who else is planning to attend the August World’s Fair of Money® show in Oklahoma City? I am.
I haven’t gone to a show in several years and have decided to take a couple of personal days off to attend.
I won’t be doing any business there - just looking at coins and socializing. 😉
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd6d3/bd6d32a5865574b5e0de6f26356084508b12a47e" alt="MFeld"
Re: Market Conditions Are Soft and Getting Worst
They were not soft in the lots that I wanted in last night's Heritage auction.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a193/6a1932903dd429f6dfeb1020b62d36f246ba0efb" alt="golden"
Re: USPS postal thefts, probably inside the Jersey City Distribution Center
Years ago, working for the Post Office was considered a decent paying blue collar job. They need to make the job position more valuable again as an incentive not to lose the job, at least more than a quick score from thievery.
Re: Post Your Alabama Commem
Billjones - wow... so that's what it's supposed to look like!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1625a/1625adf490633f0a6264212d895e2e3d60ca4d7a" alt="Darth5oh"
Re: 2024 NFL Offseason/Regular Season Thread
@Tabe said:
@Maywood said:
I don't think anyone will be satisfied with McCarthy at the helm. When he was Michigan he progressed each season but that seems as much due to the makeup of the team as his talent. He strikes me as coming from the same mold as Darnold, mainly a pure pocket passer with limited ability to avoid a rush and extend plays.Yeah, that's not accurate at all. His freshman year, he was used as a running QB alternative to McNamara. He ran a 4.48 40 in 2023. He's not a running QB like Allen or Daniels but he's not a statue like Darnold or Brady.
LOL Brady a statue?
He couldn't run but literally nobody outside of a scrambling QB had better pocket presence and evaded a sack better than Brady, literally ever
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bab2/6bab2fc2c5b86e56a6bf67ccd2021e97bf057124" alt="perkdog"
Re: Insuring your cards
@Cakes said:
I had a SDB for a couple years and it sucked not being to see my cards more.I would assume a Bank is designed to withstand a normal fire but a large wildfire that encompasses the entire building is a different story.
When you get the insurance policy does that also cover you when you ship valuable cards?
Most Bank Vaults are Fire Resistant not Fire Proof. Huge difference.
Remember the Bank can prove what CASH they had in a vault that is consumed by fire and the Government merely issue them fresh paper to replace destroyed currency. Thus the Bank are not very concerned and most cases only have the vaults themselves constructed to meet minimum federal requirements. Also in many places Deposit Boxes are "loss leaders". In my area many banks have simply eliminated them.
As correctly mentioned above:
@Groo said: an oven or kiln effect in the bank [Vault] [will occur]... all paper inside [inside safe deposit boxes] will incinerate rather quickly. Remember paper turns to fire at a mere 451F
Re: USPS postal thefts, probably inside the Jersey City Distribution Center
@MFeld said:
@OAKSTAR said:
@lermish said:
@OAKSTAR said:
@lermish said:
@OAKSTAR said:
The USPS needs to be broken up and sold to the highest private carrier bidder.... Problem solved! Any questions?As always, I have questions.
How does having a private carrier solve any of these issues?
Are UPS/FedEx/DHL/OnTrac/etc any more reliable, or just more expensive?
Does theft and incompetence stop once a giant corporation cuts costs to the bones and jacks up rates to increase profit?
What happens to the cost of postage for anyone living even a little bit away from a distribution center, particularly in small rural communities?
@jmlanzaf said:
@OAKSTAR said:
The USPS needs to be broken up and sold to the highest private carrier bidder.... Problem solved! Any questions?Given the amount of theft at FedEx and UPS, you haven't solved any problem.
No private carrier would ever bid on the USPS mission. None. Ever.
@NJCoin said:
@OAKSTAR said:
The USPS needs to be broken up and sold to the highest private carrier bidder.... Problem solved! Any questions?Yup! What do you do with all the rural routes no one wants? Tell those folks too bad, you won't be getting mail any longer unless you are willing to go to the nearest FedEx or UPS location to fetch it?
Oh, and now it's going to be costing you $10 to send a letter, because postage rates are now set by the highest PRIVATE carrier bidder? Sounds great. Why didn't anyone else ever think of it? 😀
The private guys have already skimmed off a lot of the service that can be performed at a profit and at a reasonable price. They didn't need to bid for the USPS franchise to do that.
The USPS' problem, aside from problem employees that any large organization has to deal with, is legacy benefits that will have to be paid by the government regardless, and unprofitable service mandates that Congress, and its constituents, will never give up.
Good luck getting any private enterprise to have any interest in taking that on. For free, let alone the "highest bidder."
You guys crack me up! Nothing is 100%. It's an imperfect world out there.
The United States Post Office only lost $6.5 billion dollars last year. That's billion with a B! Gone $$ out the door with zero accountability!!! Government inefficiency at it's finest! Are you going to tell me nothing can be done or improved?? I don't wanta hear what you can't do, (those people should be fired on the spot!) tell me what you can do! If you're not apart of the solution, you're apart of the problem! Stby gentlemen, more to follow.
The USPS did not lose any money last year and has never lost money. It's not a for profit business, it's a service that we as a society have agreed to fund. It always has been. That may change but for now that's how it is.
How much money did the US military lose last year? Or, if you prefer something more local, how much money did various police departments lose last year? The answer is also none because they are also services, not businesses.
It's not about making a profit. It's about getting your money's worth for the services provided.
And that wouldn't be any different for other carriers you might use for shipping. You're unfairly singling out the U.S. Post Office.
The thread is about the U.S. Post Office.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1c83/f1c8340de6fdff9d8550e0c69518ab479ccb4607" alt="OAKSTAR"
Re: USPS postal thefts, probably inside the Jersey City Distribution Center
@OAKSTAR said:
@lermish said:
@OAKSTAR said:
@lermish said:
@OAKSTAR said:
The USPS needs to be broken up and sold to the highest private carrier bidder.... Problem solved! Any questions?As always, I have questions.
How does having a private carrier solve any of these issues?
Are UPS/FedEx/DHL/OnTrac/etc any more reliable, or just more expensive?
Does theft and incompetence stop once a giant corporation cuts costs to the bones and jacks up rates to increase profit?
What happens to the cost of postage for anyone living even a little bit away from a distribution center, particularly in small rural communities?
@jmlanzaf said:
@OAKSTAR said:
The USPS needs to be broken up and sold to the highest private carrier bidder.... Problem solved! Any questions?Given the amount of theft at FedEx and UPS, you haven't solved any problem.
No private carrier would ever bid on the USPS mission. None. Ever.
@NJCoin said:
@OAKSTAR said:
The USPS needs to be broken up and sold to the highest private carrier bidder.... Problem solved! Any questions?Yup! What do you do with all the rural routes no one wants? Tell those folks too bad, you won't be getting mail any longer unless you are willing to go to the nearest FedEx or UPS location to fetch it?
Oh, and now it's going to be costing you $10 to send a letter, because postage rates are now set by the highest PRIVATE carrier bidder? Sounds great. Why didn't anyone else ever think of it? 😀
The private guys have already skimmed off a lot of the service that can be performed at a profit and at a reasonable price. They didn't need to bid for the USPS franchise to do that.
The USPS' problem, aside from problem employees that any large organization has to deal with, is legacy benefits that will have to be paid by the government regardless, and unprofitable service mandates that Congress, and its constituents, will never give up.
Good luck getting any private enterprise to have any interest in taking that on. For free, let alone the "highest bidder."
You guys crack me up! Nothing is 100%. It's an imperfect world out there.
The United States Post Office only lost $6.5 billion dollars last year. That's billion with a B! Gone $$ out the door with zero accountability!!! Government inefficiency at it's finest! Are you going to tell me nothing can be done or improved?? I don't wanta hear what you can't do, (those people should be fired on the spot!) tell me what you can do! If you're not apart of the solution, you're apart of the problem! Stby gentlemen, more to follow.
The USPS did not lose any money last year and has never lost money. It's not a for profit business, it's a service that we as a society have agreed to fund. It always has been. That may change but for now that's how it is.
How much money did the US military lose last year? Or, if you prefer something more local, how much money did various police departments lose last year? The answer is also none because they are also services, not businesses.
It's not about making a profit. It's about getting your money's worth for the services provided.
.
As others have said, careful what you wish for. Dropping a letter in the mail, and having it show up any listed address, anywhere in the US for .73 is about the best value going. And Ground Advantage with built-in or added on insurance for small value merchandise can't really be be beat either.
Re: USPS postal thefts, probably inside the Jersey City Distribution Center
@jmlanzaf said:
The United States Post Office only lost $6.5 billion dollars last year.
That's called a government service. That's why we pay taxes. By that rationale, how much did the FDA "lose" ensuring drug safety, the department of highways "lose" building and paving roads, or the DEA "lose" chasing drug traffickers