Best Of
Re: 2000-D SAC $1 multiple errors
@dcfixer said:
@RedRocket said:
Let's all take a breath before anything regrettable or rude is stated.Thank you.
No, thank you for allowing me to continue to be the voice of reason.
You asked an innocent and beginner's question and you immediately received less-than-thoughtful replies. I think perhaps many here have an axe to grind not so much with you but rather on the design elements of the coin itself. Sacawagea was and is an extremely controversial character in the fabric of this country and her likeness sparks resentments and discontent that is manifested in threads like this.
Case in point, when the "Speared Eagle" variety was discovered many cheered.
Re: 2000-D SAC $1 multiple errors
@dcfixer said:
You start with an assumption. Typical.
You support that false assumptio with…
You end with another assumption and 2 opions.
JB! Did you consume all the opions?
You should stop wasting your time.
That’s an assumption.
Creg
Re: 2000-D SAC $1 multiple errors
@dcfixer said:
I dropped out of ISU do seek my fortune in the Caifornia music industry. Didn't work out, thus GA.
Perhaps you didn't have the ear for it.
IkesT
Re: What is this? And is it collectible?
@Cruzsr85 said:
Ty for a straight answer. And I came to learn about coins not sarcasm from the rest.
You're welcome.
IkesT
ATTENTION PLEASE READ FOR SALE 3.1 grams all of 1982 NO MINT,1982 D,1982 NO MINT EDGE ERROR PENNIE
I've got a bunch of 1982 pennies small and large date 3.1 grams ungraded but well worth buying because of the $ that could be made off them or a great addition to your collection $5,000
Re: Is the One Ounce Gold Enhanced Uncirculated Coin on the mint website new?
Well I just got an email for an offer of $250 over sales price plus prepaid label. I was able to snag one easily. Tried to get a second and they were already sold out.
jwitten
Re: 2000-D SAC $1 multiple errors
@dcfixer said:
@Creg said:
Do the inexperienced members in that forum ask you about beat up train cars and then argue with you, as well?No. It is not about evaluating a model's condition. Q&A and discusions mostly center around prototypes, off the shelf parts, new releases by manufacturers and modeling methods to achieve prototype results in the models. Photos are shared of models and the work being done on them, but there is very little argument about them. Theres always an arquementative person around, but they are kind about it. If one is not kind and civil, they are warned once, and then expelled if they continue.
you describe heaven






