Home U.S. Coin Forum

Anyone else bummed that the CAC bean on the Farouk $20 is just a tad crooked?

SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,064 ✭✭✭✭✭

Serious-not-serious-but-still-c’mon-man!

Here’s a still from the Pawn Stars episode where Ian Russell shows the coin to Rick who has a buyer at 25M (not enough), and Jeff Garrett stops by, too.

«1

Comments

  • pcgsregistrycollectorpcgsregistrycollector Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Aotearoa said:
    Just imagine the value that sticker adds…

    I'd argue that the sticker is not so much where the value comes from. Sure, it might add some dough, but ultimately I think the rarity and lore behind the coin is where the true value lies. Plus, the coin looks more like a 64. Not sure why the coin CAC'd at 65.

    God comes first in everything I do. I’m dedicated to serving Him with my whole life. Coin collecting is just a hobby—but even in that, I seek to honor Him. ✝️

  • AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,561 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @pcgsregistrycollector said:

    @Aotearoa said:
    Just imagine the value that sticker adds…

    I'd argue that the sticker is not so much where the value comes from. Sure, it might add some dough, but ultimately I think the rarity and lore behind the coin is where the true value lies. Plus, the coin looks more like a 64. Not sure why the coin CAC'd at 65.

    I was being sarcastic!

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 29,280 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'd just be happy with the coin/slab

  • pcgsregistrycollectorpcgsregistrycollector Posts: 1,500 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 20, 2025 1:44PM

    @Aotearoa said:

    @pcgsregistrycollector said:

    @Aotearoa said:
    Just imagine the value that sticker adds…

    I'd argue that the sticker is not so much where the value comes from. Sure, it might add some dough, but ultimately I think the rarity and lore behind the coin is where the true value lies. Plus, the coin looks more like a 64. Not sure why the coin CAC'd at 65.

    I was being sarcastic!

    So was I!

    God comes first in everything I do. I’m dedicated to serving Him with my whole life. Coin collecting is just a hobby—but even in that, I seek to honor Him. ✝️

  • Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,419 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Are these illegal to privately own?

  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 6,604 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm more bummed that someone would consider putting such a tacky sticker on the slab of such a wonderful coin. RGDS!

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™
    Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????

  • MWallaceMWallace Posts: 4,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coin Finder said:
    Are these illegal to privately own?

    Not that one, and only that one.

  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,064 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:

    Like putting a bumper sticker on a Ferrari. ;)

    But at least put it on straight!

  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 7,637 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No.

    Seated Half Society member #38
    "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,778 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nope!

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,209 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pawn Stars is totally scripted. I tried to put a group together to try and buy that coin with the idea of approaching the Treasury and making them all legal. Went for too much for that idea to work out but it would have been interesting

  • LuxorLuxor Posts: 524 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If I was bothered by anything it would be that one work pedigree, although I agree they could at least have put the silly sticker on completely straight.

    Your hobby is supposed to be your therapy, not the reason you need it.

  • sanddollarsanddollar Posts: 341 ✭✭✭

    A gold bean would have been an attractive look with that gold insert.
    Such a shame.

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,944 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MWallace said:

    @Coin Finder said:
    Are these illegal to privately own?

    Not that one, and only that one.

    You could own others... so long as no one found out.

  • StuartStuart Posts: 9,831 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 20, 2025 6:38PM

    Here’s a High Resolution PCGS TrueView photo of the subject coin that you can enlarge to show details.


    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,464 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,064 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:
    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

    Can’t JA just compare it to all regular $20 Saints? … It was never intended as a special one-off …

  • MidLifeCrisisMidLifeCrisis Posts: 10,560 ✭✭✭✭✭

    wow

  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,151 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 20, 2025 9:02PM

    Obverse fields look MS-66 while obverse Liberty looks MS-63 but reverse all MS-66 so coin net graded MS-65.

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • DisneyFanDisneyFan Posts: 2,489 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you hold up a piece of paper to the top bottom edge of the slab and bring it down to the CAC sticker it does appear the the sticker was put on straight. The picture of the slab was was taken at an angle which makes it appear that the CAC was applied crookedly. :)

  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,464 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 20, 2025 9:57PM

    @SeattleSlammer said:

    @JBK said:
    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

    Can’t JA just compare it to all regular $20 Saints? … It was never intended as a special one-off …

    Yes, he can, and he presumably did. But is that how CAC is normally used? I thought it was to give people bragging rights within a group of coins of a particular date and mintmark. When there is effectively only one coin in existence (eligible for private ownership) then does it matter how solid for the grade it is? 🤔

    Would anyone like this coin more if it got a gold bean, or like it less if it failed to bean? For me, it would not matter at all for this particular coin.

  • MWallaceMWallace Posts: 4,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FlyingAl said:

    @MWallace said:

    @Coin Finder said:
    Are these illegal to privately own?

    Not that one, and only that one.

    You could own others... so long as no one found out.

    Not legally, which is what the question was. :)

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,814 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FlyingAl said:

    @MWallace said:

    @Coin Finder said:
    Are these illegal to privately own?

    Not that one, and only that one.

    You could own others... so long as no one found out.

    The question was whether they were "illegal".

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,814 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:

    @SeattleSlammer said:

    @JBK said:
    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

    Can’t JA just compare it to all regular $20 Saints? … It was never intended as a special one-off …

    Yes, he can, and he presumably did. But is that how CAC is normally used? I thought it was to give people bragging rights within a group of coins of a particular date and mintmark. When there is effectively only one coin in existence (eligible for private ownership) then does it matter how solid for the grade it is? 🤔

    Would anyone like this coin more if it got a gold bean, or like it less if it failed to bean? For me, it would not matter at all for this particular coin.

    Same is true of the slab itself.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,464 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @SeattleSlammer said:

    @JBK said:
    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

    Can’t JA just compare it to all regular $20 Saints? … It was never intended as a special one-off …

    Yes, he can, and he presumably did. But is that how CAC is normally used? I thought it was to give people bragging rights within a group of coins of a particular date and mintmark. When there is effectively only one coin in existence (eligible for private ownership) then does it matter how solid for the grade it is? 🤔

    Would anyone like this coin more if it got a gold bean, or like it less if it failed to bean? For me, it would not matter at all for this particular coin.

    Same is true of the slab itself.

    If that's your position then so be it, but to me it's not the same thing.

    As I had already stated:

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    The slab serves a purpose. To me, the sticker does not.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,814 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @SeattleSlammer said:

    @JBK said:
    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

    Can’t JA just compare it to all regular $20 Saints? … It was never intended as a special one-off …

    Yes, he can, and he presumably did. But is that how CAC is normally used? I thought it was to give people bragging rights within a group of coins of a particular date and mintmark. When there is effectively only one coin in existence (eligible for private ownership) then does it matter how solid for the grade it is? 🤔

    Would anyone like this coin more if it got a gold bean, or like it less if it failed to bean? For me, it would not matter at all for this particular coin.

    Same is true of the slab itself.

    If that's your position then so be it, but to me it's not the same thing.

    As I had already stated:

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    The slab serves a purpose. To me, the sticker does not.

    As a unique coin, the grade is irrelevant. And since you are unlikely to find this coin at a flea market, the authenticity is also without question. Any such trophy coin really doesn't need a slab or a sticker.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,814 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:
    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

    I'm not sure the "comparison" is a completely accurate way of looking at CAC. The sticker means "solid for the grade", it is based on the grade assigned and CAC's interpretation of those standards. I know we've all gotten tied up in his ABC analogy, but the point was never that the top 2/3 of coins in a grade by COMPARISON gets stickers. His point was that the coins that are "solid" for the grade gets a sticker.

    You see this in series where CAC is more strict than the other Big Two, like gold and I think bust halves. CAC seems to sticker a lower percentage of those coins than they do in other series.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.

  • TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 293 ✭✭✭

    The sticker doesn't mean much with regards to grade here. It's more likely CAC stickered it because they wanted their name tied to this famous coin. If PCGS called it MS67 it would still get a little green bean.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,877 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @SeattleSlammer said:

    @JBK said:
    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

    Can’t JA just compare it to all regular $20 Saints? … It was never intended as a special one-off …

    Yes, he can, and he presumably did. But is that how CAC is normally used? I thought it was to give people bragging rights within a group of coins of a particular date and mintmark. When there is effectively only one coin in existence (eligible for private ownership) then does it matter how solid for the grade it is? 🤔

    Would anyone like this coin more if it got a gold bean, or like it less if it failed to bean? For me, it would not matter at all for this particular coin.

    Same is true of the slab itself.

    If that's your position then so be it, but to me it's not the same thing.

    As I had already stated:

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    The slab serves a purpose. To me, the sticker does not.

    Blasphemy!!!!! :o

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 9,309 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TrickleCharge said:
    The sticker doesn't mean much with regards to grade here. It's more likely CAC stickered it because they wanted their name tied to this famous coin. If PCGS called it MS67 it would still get a little green bean.

  • baddogssbaddogss Posts: 1,309 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 21, 2025 6:13AM

    @Aotearoa said:
    Just imagine the value that sticker adds…

    at least 50 thent

    Thank you PCGS for the Forums! ANA # 3150931 - Successful BST with: Bah1513, ckeusa, coin22lover, coinsarefun, DCW, guitarwes, SLQ, Sunshine Rare Coin, tmot99, Tdec1000, dmarks, Flatwoods, Wondercoin, Yorkshireman
    Sugar magnolia blossoms blooming, heads all empty and I don't care ...
  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 9,309 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @baddogss said:

    @Aotearoa said:
    Just imagine the value that sticker adds…

    at least 50 thent

  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,064 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 21, 2025 7:36AM

    @TrickleCharge said:
    The sticker doesn't mean much with regards to grade here. It's more likely CAC stickered it because they wanted their name tied to this famous coin. If PCGS called it MS67 it would still get a little green bean.

    I gotta disagree there. With the obvious hits on Liberty …. I can’t see JA beaning it as a 67 solely to add CAC’s presence. Really that would just make CAC look suspect/bad with perhaps the highest profile auction coin that currently exists …

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,811 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 21, 2025 8:01AM

    In the CDN the sticker puts the coin in a higher valuation tier as there is CDN bid / CPG for CAC. So for proper retail pricing the seller is going to use the CAC CPG in deciding his ask price. If the coin is PQ he may want more especially if it’s really low pop or top pop. So the buyer could be looking at the tackon for CAC plus top pop.

    Investor
  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 7,637 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Cougar1978 said:
    In the CDN the sticker puts the coin in a higher valuation tier as there is CDN bid / CPG for CAC. So for proper retail pricing the seller is going to use the CAC CPG in deciding his ask price. If the coin is PQ he may want more especially if it’s really low pop or top pop. So the buyer could be looking at the tackon for CAC plus top pop.

    Non-sequitur! Your comment isn't germane to a one of a kind coin!

    Seated Half Society member #38
    "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,811 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Certainly the seller is in the drivers seat to ask more.

    Investor
  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,464 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @SeattleSlammer said:

    @JBK said:
    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

    Can’t JA just compare it to all regular $20 Saints? … It was never intended as a special one-off …

    Yes, he can, and he presumably did. But is that how CAC is normally used? I thought it was to give people bragging rights within a group of coins of a particular date and mintmark. When there is effectively only one coin in existence (eligible for private ownership) then does it matter how solid for the grade it is? 🤔

    Would anyone like this coin more if it got a gold bean, or like it less if it failed to bean? For me, it would not matter at all for this particular coin.

    Same is true of the slab itself.

    If that's your position then so be it, but to me it's not the same thing.

    As I had already stated:

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    The slab serves a purpose. To me, the sticker does not.

    As a unique coin, the grade is irrelevant. And since you are unlikely to find this coin at a flea market, the authenticity is also without question. Any such trophy coin really doesn't need a slab or a sticker.

    Why do you always have to challenge or criticize other people's opinions? You represent your challenge or criticism as fact, when it is actually just your opinion.

    Do you ever actually post anything that does not quote another poster? If it weren't for your argumentative responses I suspect that your post count would be pretty minimal. 🤔

  • SwampboySwampboy Posts: 13,115 ✭✭✭✭✭

    OCD, eh
    I feel ya

    "Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso

  • SwampboySwampboy Posts: 13,115 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 21, 2025 1:03PM

    @PerryHall said:

    @blitzdude said:
    I'm more bummed that someone would consider putting such a tacky sticker on the slab of such a wonderful coin. RGDS!

    Like putting a bumper sticker on a Ferrari. ;)

    I saw a bumper sticker on a Ferrari
    It said 'I identify as a Cyber Truck'

    "Inspiration exists, but it has to find you working" Pablo Picasso

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,814 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Cougar1978 said:
    In the CDN the sticker puts the coin in a higher valuation tier as there is CDN bid / CPG for CAC. So for proper retail pricing the seller is going to use the CAC CPG in deciding his ask price. If the coin is PQ he may want more especially if it’s really low pop or top pop. So the buyer could be looking at the tackon for CAC plus top pop.

    Is that how you price your 1933 Double Eagles?

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,814 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @SeattleSlammer said:

    @JBK said:
    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

    Can’t JA just compare it to all regular $20 Saints? … It was never intended as a special one-off …

    Yes, he can, and he presumably did. But is that how CAC is normally used? I thought it was to give people bragging rights within a group of coins of a particular date and mintmark. When there is effectively only one coin in existence (eligible for private ownership) then does it matter how solid for the grade it is? 🤔

    Would anyone like this coin more if it got a gold bean, or like it less if it failed to bean? For me, it would not matter at all for this particular coin.

    Same is true of the slab itself.

    If that's your position then so be it, but to me it's not the same thing.

    As I had already stated:

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    The slab serves a purpose. To me, the sticker does not.

    As a unique coin, the grade is irrelevant. And since you are unlikely to find this coin at a flea market, the authenticity is also without question. Any such trophy coin really doesn't need a slab or a sticker.

    Why do you always have to challenge or criticize other people's opinions? You represent your challenge or criticism as fact, when it is actually just your opinion.

    Do you ever actually post anything that does not quote another poster? If it weren't for your argumentative responses I suspect that your post count would be pretty minimal. 🤔

    When did I day that was anything but my opinion? Your belief in the slab and lack of belief in the sticker is also simply your opinion and not a fact. So what?

    I like to chat on the forum, so I often quote people. Some people are friendlier to chat with than others. Since you like to chat, I'm going to make it a point to quote you more frequently.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,464 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @SeattleSlammer said:

    @JBK said:
    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

    Can’t JA just compare it to all regular $20 Saints? … It was never intended as a special one-off …

    Yes, he can, and he presumably did. But is that how CAC is normally used? I thought it was to give people bragging rights within a group of coins of a particular date and mintmark. When there is effectively only one coin in existence (eligible for private ownership) then does it matter how solid for the grade it is? 🤔

    Would anyone like this coin more if it got a gold bean, or like it less if it failed to bean? For me, it would not matter at all for this particular coin.

    Same is true of the slab itself.

    If that's your position then so be it, but to me it's not the same thing.

    As I had already stated:

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    The slab serves a purpose. To me, the sticker does not.

    As a unique coin, the grade is irrelevant. And since you are unlikely to find this coin at a flea market, the authenticity is also without question. Any such trophy coin really doesn't need a slab or a sticker.

    Why do you always have to challenge or criticize other people's opinions? You represent your challenge or criticism as fact, when it is actually just your opinion.

    Do you ever actually post anything that does not quote another poster? If it weren't for your argumentative responses I suspect that your post count would be pretty minimal. 🤔

    When did I day that was anything but my opinion? Your belief in the slab and lack of belief in the sticker is also simply your opinion and not a fact. So what?

    You virtually never qualify your declarative statements as simply your opinion, and they lack any semblance of humility. (I had to assume the word "day" was just a careless misspelling of the word "say").

    I like to chat on the forum, so I often quote people. Some people are friendlier to chat with than others. Since you like to chat, I'm going to make it a point to quote you more frequently.

    You have an interesting definition of the word "chat". But if you feel compelled to quote me that's fine as long as you stay current with the royalty payments.

  • Coins3675Coins3675 Posts: 387 ✭✭✭

    If I were CAC I would fix it for free. Sometimes I think CAC stickers the nicer coins to have their brand associated with the high-end numismatics.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,935 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Cougar1978 said:
    In the CDN the sticker puts the coin in a higher valuation tier as there is CDN bid / CPG for CAC. So for proper retail pricing the seller is going to use the CAC CPG in deciding his ask price. If the coin is PQ he may want more especially if it’s really low pop or top pop. So the buyer could be looking at the tackon for CAC plus top pop.

    Is that how you price your 1933 Double Eagles?

    He clearly has tunnel vision when it comes to price guides, so that might be how he prices all his coins. And perhaps he doesn’t understand that extremely rare and unique coins might not be tied to a price guide.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Steven59Steven59 Posts: 10,085 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The CAC sticker is fine - it's the holder that's slightly tilted!

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,814 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @JBK said:

    @SeattleSlammer said:

    @JBK said:
    I'm mostly just a little bothered that it was stickered at all. After all, it's a unique coin.

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    To me, CAC represents a comparison. But there is nothing to compare this coin to, counting only the coins that are legally held in private hands, which is exactly one - this one.

    Can’t JA just compare it to all regular $20 Saints? … It was never intended as a special one-off …

    Yes, he can, and he presumably did. But is that how CAC is normally used? I thought it was to give people bragging rights within a group of coins of a particular date and mintmark. When there is effectively only one coin in existence (eligible for private ownership) then does it matter how solid for the grade it is? 🤔

    Would anyone like this coin more if it got a gold bean, or like it less if it failed to bean? For me, it would not matter at all for this particular coin.

    Same is true of the slab itself.

    If that's your position then so be it, but to me it's not the same thing.

    As I had already stated:

    I'm interested in knowing that it's authentic. I'm curious about its grade. I couldn't care less where it falls on the CAC spectrum.

    The slab serves a purpose. To me, the sticker does not.

    As a unique coin, the grade is irrelevant. And since you are unlikely to find this coin at a flea market, the authenticity is also without question. Any such trophy coin really doesn't need a slab or a sticker.

    Why do you always have to challenge or criticize other people's opinions? You represent your challenge or criticism as fact, when it is actually just your opinion.

    Do you ever actually post anything that does not quote another poster? If it weren't for your argumentative responses I suspect that your post count would be pretty minimal. 🤔

    When did I day that was anything but my opinion? Your belief in the slab and lack of belief in the sticker is also simply your opinion and not a fact. So what?

    You virtually never qualify your declarative statements as simply your opinion, and they lack any semblance of humility. (I had to assume the word "day" was just a careless misspelling of the word "say").

    I like to chat on the forum, so I often quote people. Some people are friendlier to chat with than others. Since you like to chat, I'm going to make it a point to quote you more frequently.

    You have an interesting definition of the word "chat". But if you feel compelled to quote me that's fine as long as you stay current with the royalty payments.

    You get 95% of revenue. Don't spend it all in one place. [That's only a humorous idiom not an order. ]

    All comments reflect the author's opinion, even when irrefutably factual. .

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file