Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Recent crusty seated half purchases!

ElmerFusterpuckElmerFusterpuck Posts: 4,918 ✭✭✭✭✭
A couple of recent purchases - these are tough to find unmessed with. The 1848 is the first I've seen of that date in ages, especially in the look I like. The 1861 is another one where I had to chase it down.

1848 PCGS VF-35 CAC

image

image


1861 PCGS XF-45

image

image


Link to my seated half collection, this series is starting to suck me in!

Seated Halves

Comments

  • Options
    STONESTONE Posts: 15,275 ✭
    Nice Puppies image


    BTW - Link doesn't work image
  • Options
    CircOnlyCircOnly Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭✭
    Lovely! image
  • Options
    ElmerFusterpuckElmerFusterpuck Posts: 4,918 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Fixed link to the seated halves, not sure why the stray stuff showed up in the link address.
  • Options
    Nice coins I like them both. I thought the 1861 was a common date but why is it so expensive in unc. condition. Is it because it is a civil was date?
  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    etexmikeetexmike Posts: 6,852 ✭✭✭
    A couple of nice pickups but I really like the look of the 1848.


    Mike
  • Options
    I really like, very nice.
    Winner of the "You Suck!" award March 17, 2010 by LanLord, doh, 123cents and Bear.
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Definite crustiness..... nice coins...Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great looking coins.

    I might get a few shots thrown at me but my experience tells me the 1848 has been cleaned (maybe just soap and water) at some time.

    Look at the amount and thickness of the 'crustiness' (or dirt) around the relief points (letters, date and profile).

    In my opinion, this doesn't occur without the whole coin being dirty.

    Currently, the fields aren't, so I conclude the coin has been cleaned in some way before.
    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • Options
    SamByrdSamByrd Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭✭
    The 48 is really a great example its color and surfaces are outstanding. I also think they were perhaps a bit tough on the coin at 35 the obverse is quite meaty for a 35. I do think the grade is right on but it is PQ and deserving of the bean. image
  • Options
    ElmerFusterpuckElmerFusterpuck Posts: 4,918 ✭✭✭✭✭
    DoubleEagle,

    No shots coming your way, I figured that could have happened, but perhaps long ago. I wonder if it circulated or was carried around some as a pocket piece afterwards? Either way, it looks way better than the numerous blast white, circulated examples I keep running across. Halves like the below just make me cringe:

    Washed out #1

    Washed out #2

    Washed out #3
  • Options
    DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,433 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>DoubleEagle,

    No shots coming your way, I figured that could have happened, but perhaps long ago. I wonder if it circulated or was carried around some as a pocket piece afterwards? Either way, it looks way better than the numerous blast white, circulated examples I keep running across. Halves like the below just make me cringe:

    Washed out #1

    Washed out #2

    Washed out #3 >>



    I agree.

    I'd definitely choose yours over any white washed out coin.
    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • Options
    steelieleesteelielee Posts: 1,177 ✭✭✭
    Like that 48, nice look
    ************************************

    Many successful BST transactions with dozens of board members, references on request.
  • Options
    dogwooddogwood Posts: 1,935 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Great looking coins.

    I might get a few shots thrown at me but my experience tells me the 1848 has been cleaned (maybe just soap and water) at some time.

    Look at the amount and thickness of the 'crustiness' (or dirt) around the relief points (letters, date and profile).

    In my opinion, this doesn't occur without the whole coin being dirty.

    Currently, the fields aren't, so I conclude the coin has been cleaned in some way before. >>



    Agreed. Happens a lot in Barber Halves as well. And they are still among the most desirable visually, and fully deserving of certification. I would submit that if you aggressively thumbed your '61 for a minute it would look exactly like the '48. I'm sure that's what many collectors of old did before they socked them away for keeps.
    Nice coins!
    We're all born MS70. I'm about a Fine 15 right now.
  • Options
    kazkaz Posts: 9,393 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A great looking pair of veterans from the channels of commerce, congrats!
  • Options
    TomBTomB Posts: 23,293 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like them quite a bit!
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Options
    jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 11,280 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Gorgeous set of CBH's, Elmer. Truly an enjoyment watching the display. Thanks for sharing and congrats. That is my favorite look for coins.
    Jim

    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • Options
    johnravjohnrav Posts: 230 ✭✭
    with coinfacts open this weekend, I just had a 1848 (and a 54) out for research, and photographing..

    image

    also downloaded photoscape software and gave that a try. very easy.
  • Options
    johnravjohnrav Posts: 230 ✭✭
    and the 54

    any feedback on them (they are raw) would be appreciated.

    image
  • Options
    ElmerFusterpuckElmerFusterpuck Posts: 4,918 ✭✭✭✭✭
    John,

    Your halves appear to be pretty high grade, but the lighting on the photos makes it kind of tough to give good (or correct) feedback. I'm not sure if they are toned or are all white, dipped or natural so I'll withhold judgement. Looks like you just need an extra light source on your coins to male them 'pop', it appears you just one one light source coming from the left side.
  • Options
    johnravjohnrav Posts: 230 ✭✭
    thanks eric. they are all put away again, so that all the pictures. but yes, one light (a window) and pictures are same as coins. the 54 has some color, if anything, the 48 maybe a little darker in hand.
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,409 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I came in hopes of seein' some CircCams, but that kind of "crusty" is terrific, too, of course!

    Love 'em. Quite an appealing collecting avenue, I would think. Of course I had to peek at the rest of your collection. Wow, very impressive.

    Your proof and the 1853 NGC 53 really leapt off the page for me. Now you just need some great black-and-white CircCams in there.

    Here's a common-date circ I just traded away. It's not a real black-and-white CircCam, either, but the contrast is there.

    image


    Bravo! I love looking at coins like this. Keep up the pursuit! image

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    USMoneyloverUSMoneylover Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭
    Really love the look of the 1861...here is an 1876 CC I have:
    image
    Finest Coins and Relics
  • Options
    BarberianBarberian Posts: 4,643 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's a few circ cameos that you might like Lord M.

    imageimage

    imageimage

    imageimage

    imageimage

    imageimage
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,409 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Here's a few circ cameos that you might like Lord M. >>

    You got THAT right!

    I'm especially likin' that '57-O and the obverse. And based on the pictures, that 1846 looks the most awesome to me- that obverse looks fantastic.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I bought this VF35-or-so 1848 from Rich Uhrich about 5 years ago, and I can barely remember seeing any of that date since. The 1848 quarter is a similar sleeper date.

    image
  • Options
    Very nice original looking coins!image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file